Skip to main content
Alpha

This is a rebuild of Drinking Water Watch and not yet the official record. Use the agency’s current Drinking Water Watch for anything you need to rely on.

Chemical and radiological sample results

MS0020005 , Town of Rienzi

21 of the 58 analytes this system has been tested for have been detected at least once, across 325 samples on record.

The other 37 were tested for and never found. An analyte is counted here if any result on record measured it, so this covers the whole history and not the samples listed below.

Across all 325 samples on record, detections range from November 3, 1993 to July 6, 2026. These figures cover the whole record.

What counts as a non-detect is defined in the help: Less than Indicator. This system’s violations.

What has been detected, ever

Every analyte measured above its reporting level at any point in this system’s record, most often detected first. This is not limited to the samples listed below.

Every analyte ever detected for Town of Rienzi, with how many results found it and when it was first and last detected. Covers the whole record, not only the samples listed below.
Analyte Kind Detected in First detected Last detected
Copper, Free 1022 Inorganic Chemical 88 of 139 results May 25, 1994 Jul 8, 2025
Lead 1030 Inorganic Chemical 29 of 139 results Nov 3, 1993 Jul 8, 2025
Barium 1010 Inorganic Chemical 24 of 24 results Jan 22, 2002 Jul 6, 2026
Nickel 1036 Inorganic Chemical 20 of 22 results Jan 22, 2002 Jan 27, 2025
TTHM 2950 Organic Chemical 19 of 24 results May 3, 2004 Apr 28, 2026
Dibromochloromethane 2944 Organic Chemical 15 of 19 results Sep 18, 2007 Apr 28, 2026
Chloroform 2941 Organic Chemical 13 of 19 results Oct 1, 2007 Apr 28, 2026
Bromodichloromethane 2943 Organic Chemical 12 of 19 results Oct 1, 2007 Apr 28, 2026
Gross Alpha, Incl. Radon & U 4002 Radionuclide 10 of 10 results Dec 6, 2011 Jul 10, 2012
Chromium 1020 Inorganic Chemical 9 of 24 results Jan 10, 2005 May 9, 2022
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 Organic Chemical 8 of 23 results Jun 25, 2007 May 10, 2024
Sodium 1052 Inorganic Chemical 6 of 6 results Sep 17, 2019 Oct 14, 2024
Fluoride 1025 Inorganic Chemical 4 of 24 results Mar 24, 2008 Jul 6, 2026
Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 Organic Chemical 4 of 17 results Jul 28, 2014 Aug 1, 2024
Bromoform 2942 Organic Chemical 4 of 19 results Sep 18, 2007 Aug 1, 2024
Cadmium 1015 Inorganic Chemical 4 of 24 results Jan 10, 2005 Mar 24, 2008
Sulfate 1055 Inorganic Chemical 4 of 4 results Jan 22, 2002 Jan 14, 2004
Selenium 1045 Inorganic Chemical 3 of 24 results Jan 10, 2005 Jan 17, 2006
Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 Organic Chemical 1 of 17 results Jun 4, 2019 Jun 4, 2019
Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 Organic Chemical 1 of 17 results Mar 11, 2019 Mar 11, 2019
Xylenes, Total 2955 Organic Chemical 1 of 32 results Sep 22, 2011 Sep 22, 2011

No date range is applied: this list draws on every sample on record. Show the last two years only.

The most recent samples, result by result

The table below lists 191–200 of 325 samples, newest first — collected May 5, 2008 to May 2, 2011. The summary above covers all 325.

43 results from the 10 samples listed here: 4 detected, 39 not detected. Across the whole record it is 279 of 1,636. A sample is analysed for many analytes at once, so one sample appears on as many rows as it had results.

Chemical and radiological sample results for Town of Rienzi, every result from 191 to 200 of 325 samples shown, newest first. Not detected means the amount was below the level the laboratory can reliably report, which is given beside it.
Result Analyte Monitoring period
Collected
May 2, 2011
Sampling point
TF101 Treatment Plant T101
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
110503-056IN
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected May 2, 2011, sampling point TF101 Arsenic 1005 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013
0.282033 mg/l , sample collected May 2, 2011, sampling point TF101 Barium 1010 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected May 2, 2011, sampling point TF101 Cadmium 1015 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013
0.001113 mg/l , sample collected May 2, 2011, sampling point TF101 Chromium 1020 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013
Not detected below 0.1 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected May 2, 2011, sampling point TF101 Fluoride 1025 EPA method 380-75WE Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected May 2, 2011, sampling point TF101 Mercury 1035 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected May 2, 2011, sampling point TF101 Nickel 1036 EPA method 200.8 Not recorded
Not detected below 0.0025 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected May 2, 2011, sampling point TF101 Selenium 1045 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected May 2, 2011, sampling point TF101 Antimony, Total 1074 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected May 2, 2011, sampling point TF101 Beryllium, Total 1075 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected May 2, 2011, sampling point TF101 Thallium, Total 1085 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013
Collected
Jan 18, 2011
Sampling point
TF102 Treatment Plant T102
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
110119-038NI
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
Not detected below 0.1 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jan 18, 2011, sampling point TF102 Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2 Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2011
Not detected below 0.08 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jan 18, 2011, sampling point TF102 Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2 Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2011
Not detected below 0.02 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jan 18, 2011, sampling point TF102 Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2 Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2011
Collected
Jan 18, 2011
Sampling point
TF101 Treatment Plant T101
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
110119-037NI
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
Not detected below 0.1 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jan 18, 2011, sampling point TF101 Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2 Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2011
Not detected below 0.08 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jan 18, 2011, sampling point TF101 Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2 Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2011
Not detected below 0.02 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jan 18, 2011, sampling point TF101 Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2 Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2011
Collected
Jun 8, 2010
Sampling point
MRT000 Max. Res. Time
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
100609-004HA
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 8, 2010, sampling point MRT000 Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 8, 2010, sampling point MRT000 Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 8, 2010, sampling point MRT000 Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 8, 2010, sampling point MRT000 Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 8, 2010, sampling point MRT000 Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Jun 8, 2010, sampling point MRT000 Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Collected
Jun 8, 2010
Sampling point
MRT000 Max. Res. Time
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
100609-004TH
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 8, 2010, sampling point MRT000 Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 8, 2010, sampling point MRT000 Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 8, 2010, sampling point MRT000 Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 8, 2010, sampling point MRT000 Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Jun 8, 2010, sampling point MRT000 TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Collected
May 19, 2010
Sampling point
TF102 Treatment Plant T102
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
100520-062NI
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
Not detected below 0.25 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected May 19, 2010, sampling point TF102 Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2 Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.2 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected May 19, 2010, sampling point TF102 Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2 Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.05 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected May 19, 2010, sampling point TF102 Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2 Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010
Collected
May 19, 2010
Sampling point
TF101 Treatment Plant T101
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
100520-061NI
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
Not detected below 0.25 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected May 19, 2010, sampling point TF101 Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2 Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.2 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected May 19, 2010, sampling point TF101 Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2 Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.05 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected May 19, 2010, sampling point TF101 Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2 Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010
Collected
Mar 11, 2009
Sampling point
TF102 Treatment Plant T102
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
090312-039NI
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
Not detected below 0.25 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Mar 11, 2009, sampling point TF102 Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2 Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009
Not detected below 0.2 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Mar 11, 2009, sampling point TF102 Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2 Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009
Not detected below 0.05 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Mar 11, 2009, sampling point TF102 Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2 Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009
Collected
Mar 11, 2009
Sampling point
TF101 Treatment Plant T101
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
090312-038NI
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
Not detected below 0.25 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Mar 11, 2009, sampling point TF101 Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2 Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009
Not detected below 0.2 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Mar 11, 2009, sampling point TF101 Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2 Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009
Not detected below 0.05 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Mar 11, 2009, sampling point TF101 Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2 Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009
Collected
May 5, 2008
Sampling point
TF101 Treatment Plant T101
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
080506-014NI
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
Not detected below 0.1 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected May 5, 2008, sampling point TF101 Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2 Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008
Not detected below 0.08 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected May 5, 2008, sampling point TF101 Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2 Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008
Not detected below 0.02 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected May 5, 2008, sampling point TF101 Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2 Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008

Routine (10).