Alpha
This is a rebuild of Drinking Water Watch and not yet the official record. Use the agency’s current Drinking Water Watch for anything you need to rely on.
TTHM results
MS0020008 , Kossuth W/A #2-Bethlehem
21 samples have been analysed for TTHM at Kossuth W/A #2-Bethlehem.
This is one analyte out of the system’s whole record. For what has ever been detected here, and when, see all chemical and radiological results; for everything the system is tested for, see the analyte list.
What counts as a non-detect is defined in the help: Less than Indicator. This system’s violations.
No date range is applied: this list draws on every sample on record. Show the last two years only.
Every TTHM result
The table below lists 11–20 of 21 samples, newest first — collected June 26, 2007 to March 27, 2023.
10 TTHM results from the 10 samples listed here: 4 detected, 6 not detected. Those samples also carried 28 results for other analytes, which are on the full results page.
Units in this table
TTHM is recorded on this page in ug/l and mg/l. 1 mg/l = 1,000 ug/l.
| Result | Analyte | Monitoring period |
|---|---|---|
|
||
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Mar 27, 2023 13:58, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
|
||
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 7, 2022 12:00, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
|
||
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 24, 2021 14:18, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Jan 1, 2021 – Dec 31, 2021 |
|
||
| Not detected below 4 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 13, 2020 13:40, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 | Jan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2020 |
|
||
| 1.03 ug/l , sample collected Mar 12, 2019 13:30, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 | Not recorded |
|
||
| 2.53 ug/l , sample collected Aug 28, 2017 13:45, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 | Jan 1, 2017 – Dec 31, 2019 |
|
||
| Not detected below 4 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 30, 2014 03:00, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Jan 1, 2014 – Dec 31, 2016 |
|
||
| Not detected below 4 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 12, 2011 12:50, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013 |
|
||
| 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Jul 14, 2008, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Jun 26, 2007, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007 |
-
- Collected
- Mar 27, 2023 13:58
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- TH-230328-071
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Feb 7, 2022 12:00
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- TH-220208-013
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Aug 24, 2021 14:18
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- TH-210825-014
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2021 – Dec 31, 2021
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Jul 13, 2020 13:40
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 200714-001TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2020
-
TTHM 2950
- Result
- Not detected below 4 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Mar 12, 2019 13:30
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 190313-009TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
TTHM 2950
- Result
- 1.03 ug/l
-
- Collected
- Aug 28, 2017 13:45
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 170829-017TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2017 – Dec 31, 2019
-
TTHM 2950
- Result
- 2.53 ug/l
-
- Collected
- Jul 30, 2014 03:00
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 140731-012TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2014 – Dec 31, 2016
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 4 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Jul 12, 2011 12:50
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 110713-017TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 4 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Jul 14, 2008
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 080715-021TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
-
- Collected
- Jun 26, 2007
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 070627-001TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
Routine (10).