This is a rebuild of Drinking Water Watch and not yet the official record. Use the agency’s current Drinking Water Watch for anything you need to rely on.
Chemical and radiological sample results
MS0020014 , Prentiss-Alcorn Water Assn
21 of the 57 analytes this system has been tested for have been detected at least once, across 251 samples on record.
The other 36 were tested for and never found. An analyte is counted here if any result on record measured it, so this covers the whole history and not the samples listed below.
Across all 251 samples on record, detections range from November 3, 1993 to August 12, 2025. These figures cover the whole record.
What counts as a non-detect is defined in the help: Less than Indicator. This system’s violations.
What has been detected, ever
Every analyte measured above its reporting level at any point in this system’s record, most often detected first. This is not limited to the samples listed below.
| Analyte | Kind | Detected in | First detected | Last detected |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper, Free 1022 | Inorganic Chemical | 124 of 151 results | Nov 3, 1993 | Jun 12, 2025 |
| Lead 1030 | Inorganic Chemical | 48 of 151 results | Nov 3, 1993 | Jun 12, 2025 |
| TTHM 2950 | Organic Chemical | 12 of 20 results | May 3, 2004 | Aug 12, 2025 |
| Barium 1010 | Inorganic Chemical | 11 of 11 results | Jan 15, 2002 | Jan 15, 2025 |
| Nickel 1036 | Inorganic Chemical | 10 of 11 results | Jan 15, 2002 | Jan 15, 2025 |
| Bromodichloromethane 2943 | Organic Chemical | 8 of 16 results | May 13, 2019 | Aug 12, 2025 |
| Chloroform 2941 | Organic Chemical | 7 of 16 results | Feb 21, 2024 | Aug 12, 2025 |
| Chromium 1020 | Inorganic Chemical | 7 of 11 results | Jan 12, 2004 | Jan 15, 2025 |
| Fluoride 1025 | Inorganic Chemical | 5 of 11 results | Jan 10, 2005 | Jan 15, 2025 |
| Gross Alpha, Incl. Radon & U 4002 | Radionuclide | 5 of 5 results | Dec 5, 2011 | Jul 10, 2012 |
| Dibromochloromethane 2944 | Organic Chemical | 4 of 16 results | May 13, 2019 | Aug 12, 2025 |
| Sodium 1052 | Inorganic Chemical | 3 of 3 results | Sep 17, 2019 | Oct 14, 2024 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Organic Chemical | 3 of 19 results | Jun 27, 2007 | Feb 26, 2024 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 | Organic Chemical | 2 of 15 results | Jul 5, 2011 | May 6, 2024 |
| Selenium 1045 | Inorganic Chemical | 2 of 11 results | Jan 12, 2004 | Jan 10, 2005 |
| Sulfate 1055 | Inorganic Chemical | 2 of 2 results | Jan 15, 2002 | Jan 12, 2004 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 | Inorganic Chemical | 1 of 23 results | Feb 18, 2013 | Feb 18, 2013 |
| Nitrate 1040 | Inorganic Chemical | 1 of 23 results | Feb 18, 2013 | Feb 18, 2013 |
| Arsenic 1005 | Inorganic Chemical | 1 of 11 results | Apr 25, 2011 | Apr 25, 2011 |
| Xylenes, Total 2955 | Organic Chemical | 1 of 13 results | Apr 5, 2004 | Apr 5, 2004 |
| Ethylbenzene 2992 | Organic Chemical | 1 of 13 results | Apr 5, 2004 | Apr 5, 2004 |
No date range is applied: this list draws on every sample on record. Show the last two years only.
The most recent samples, result by result
The table below lists 141–150 of 251 samples, newest first — collected June 27, 2007 to July 10, 2007. The summary above covers all 251.
22 results from the 10 samples listed here: 12 detected, 10 not detected. Across the whole record it is 258 of 983. A sample is analysed for many analytes at once, so one sample appears on as many rows as it had results.
| Result | Analyte | Monitoring period |
|---|---|---|
|
||
| 0.2957 mg/l , sample collected Jul 10, 2007, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
| 0.0009 mg/l , sample collected Jul 10, 2007, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
|
||
| 0.0762 mg/l , sample collected Jul 10, 2007, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 10, 2007, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
|
||
| 0.2314 mg/l , sample collected Jul 10, 2007, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 10, 2007, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
|
||
| 0.338 mg/l , sample collected Jul 10, 2007, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 10, 2007, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
|
||
| 0.6579 mg/l , sample collected Jul 10, 2007, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
| 0.0027 mg/l , sample collected Jul 10, 2007, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
|
||
| 0.225 mg/l , sample collected Jul 10, 2007, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 10, 2007, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
|
||
| 0.1644 mg/l , sample collected Jul 10, 2007, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 10, 2007, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
|
||
| 0.5903 mg/l , sample collected Jul 10, 2007, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 10, 2007, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
|
||
| 0.0004 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Jun 27, 2007, sampling point MRT000 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 EPA method 552.2 | Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007 |
|
||
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 27, 2007, sampling point MRT000 | Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 27, 2007, sampling point MRT000 | Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 27, 2007, sampling point MRT000 | Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 27, 2007, sampling point MRT000 | Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Jun 27, 2007, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007 |
-
- Collected
- Jul 10, 2007
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 070711-248PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.2957 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0009 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Jul 10, 2007
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 070711-247PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0762 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Jul 10, 2007
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 070711-096PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.2314 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Jul 10, 2007
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 070711-091PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.338 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Jul 10, 2007
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 070711-092PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.6579 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0027 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Jul 10, 2007
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 070711-093PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.225 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Jul 10, 2007
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 070711-094PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.1644 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Jul 10, 2007
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 070711-095PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.5903 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Jun 27, 2007
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 070628-001HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- 0.0004 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
-
- Collected
- Jun 27, 2007
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 070628-001TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
-
Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007
Routine (10).