This is a rebuild of Drinking Water Watch and not yet the official record. Use the agency’s current Drinking Water Watch for anything you need to rely on.
Chemical and radiological sample results
MS0030006 , Pine Street Water Association
6 of the 14 analytes this system has been tested for have been detected at least once, across 116 samples on record.
The other 8 were tested for and never found. An analyte is counted here if any result on record measured it, so this covers the whole history and not the samples listed below.
Across all 116 samples on record, detections range from November 29, 1993 to August 13, 2024. These figures cover the whole record.
What counts as a non-detect is defined in the help: Less than Indicator. This system’s violations.
What has been detected, ever
Every analyte measured above its reporting level at any point in this system’s record, most often detected first. This is not limited to the samples listed below.
| Analyte | Kind | Detected in | First detected | Last detected |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper, Free 1022 | Inorganic Chemical | 69 of 98 results | Sep 18, 2000 | Aug 13, 2024 |
| Lead 1030 | Inorganic Chemical | 39 of 98 results | Nov 29, 1993 | Aug 13, 2024 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Organic Chemical | 3 of 9 results | Jun 25, 2007 | Jul 7, 2011 |
| TTHM 2950 | Organic Chemical | 3 of 8 results | May 3, 2004 | Jun 1, 2010 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 | Organic Chemical | 1 of 5 results | Jul 7, 2011 | Jul 7, 2011 |
| Chloroform 2941 | Organic Chemical | 1 of 5 results | Jun 1, 2010 | Jun 1, 2010 |
No date range is applied: this list draws on every sample on record. Show the last two years only.
The most recent samples, result by result
The table below lists 61–70 of 116 samples, newest first — collected July 8, 2008 to July 7, 2011. The summary above covers all 116.
30 results from the 10 samples listed here: 12 detected, 18 not detected. Across the whole record it is 116 of 259. A sample is analysed for many analytes at once, so one sample appears on as many rows as it had results.
| Result | Analyte | Monitoring period |
|---|---|---|
|
||
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 7, 2011 12:20, sampling point MRT000 | Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 7, 2011 12:20, sampling point MRT000 | Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 7, 2011 12:20, sampling point MRT000 | Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 7, 2011 12:20, sampling point MRT000 | Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 4 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 7, 2011 12:20, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013 |
|
||
| 0.0673 mg/l , sample collected Jun 15, 2011, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 15, 2011, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011 |
|
||
| 0.0261 mg/l , sample collected Jun 15, 2011, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011 |
| 0.0009 mg/l , sample collected Jun 15, 2011, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011 |
|
||
| 0.0901 mg/l , sample collected Jun 15, 2011, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 15, 2011, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011 |
|
||
| 0.1489 mg/l , sample collected Jun 14, 2011, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 14, 2011, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011 |
|
||
| 0.1936 mg/l , sample collected Jun 14, 2011, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 14, 2011, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011 |
|
||
| 1.18 ug/l , sample collected Jun 1, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 1, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 1, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 1, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| 1.18 ug/l , sample collected Jun 1, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 1, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 1, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 1, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 1, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 1, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Jun 1, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| 0.1703 mg/l , sample collected Jul 8, 2008, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 8, 2008, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
|
||
| 0.1361 mg/l , sample collected Jul 8, 2008, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
| 0.0046 mg/l , sample collected Jul 8, 2008, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
-
- Collected
- Jul 7, 2011 12:20
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 110708-002TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
-
Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 4 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013
-
- Collected
- Jun 15, 2011
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 110616-010PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0673 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Jun 15, 2011
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 110616-007PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0261 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0009 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Jun 15, 2011
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 110616-006PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0901 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Jun 14, 2011
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 110616-009PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.1489 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Jun 14, 2011
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 110616-008PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.1936 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Jun 1, 2010
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100602-003TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
-
Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 1.18 ug/l
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 1.18 ug/l
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
- Collected
- Jun 1, 2010
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100602-003HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
-
Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
- Collected
- Jul 8, 2008
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 080709-106PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.1703 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Jul 8, 2008
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 080709-105PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.1361 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0046 mg/l
Routine (10).