Alpha
This is a rebuild of Drinking Water Watch and not yet the official record. Use the agency’s current Drinking Water Watch for anything you need to rely on.
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) results
MS0040008 , Possumneck-Carmack W/A
41 samples have been analysed for Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) at Possumneck-Carmack W/A.
This is one analyte out of the system’s whole record. For what has ever been detected here, and when, see all chemical and radiological results; for everything the system is tested for, see the analyte list.
What counts as a non-detect is defined in the help: Less than Indicator. This system’s violations.
No date range is applied: this list draws on every sample on record. Show the last two years only.
Every Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) result
The table below lists 21–30 of 41 samples, newest first — collected October 16, 2007 to February 1, 2010.
10 Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) results from the 10 samples listed here: 9 detected, 1 not detected. Those samples also carried 45 results for other analytes, which are on the full results page.
| Result | Analyte | Monitoring period |
|---|---|---|
|
||
| 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Feb 1, 2010, sampling point SM1 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Not recorded |
|
||
| 0.02 mg/l , sample collected Nov 9, 2009, sampling point SM2 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Not recorded |
|
||
| 0.01 mg/l , sample collected Nov 9, 2009, sampling point SM1 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Not recorded |
|
||
| 0.01 mg/l , sample collected Aug 13, 2009, sampling point SM2 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Not recorded |
|
||
| 0 mg/l This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. , sample collected Aug 13, 2009, sampling point SM1 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Not recorded |
|
||
| 0.01 mg/l , sample collected May 4, 2009, sampling point SM2 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Not recorded |
|
||
| 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected May 4, 2009, sampling point SM1 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Not recorded |
|
||
| Not detected below 0.006 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Apr 28, 2008, sampling point MRT000 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Apr 1, 2008 – Jun 30, 2008 |
|
||
| 0.009 mg/l , sample collected Jan 29, 2008, sampling point MRT000 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Jan 1, 2008 – Mar 31, 2008 |
|
||
| 0.0068 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Oct 16, 2007, sampling point MRT000 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 EPA method 552.2 | Oct 1, 2007 – Dec 31, 2007 |
-
- Collected
- Feb 1, 2010
- Sampling point
- SM1 County Barn
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100202-039HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
-
- Collected
- Nov 9, 2009
- Sampling point
- SM2 Emmitt Erving 3675 Ar 3007
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 091110-036HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- 0.02 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Nov 9, 2009
- Sampling point
- SM1 County Barn
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 091110-035HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- 0.01 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Aug 13, 2009
- Sampling point
- SM2 Emmitt Erving 3675 Ar 3007
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 090814-003HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- 0.01 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Aug 13, 2009
- Sampling point
- SM1 County Barn
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 090814-002HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- 0 mg/l This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here.
-
- Collected
- May 4, 2009
- Sampling point
- SM2 Emmitt Erving 3675 Ar 3007
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 090505-020HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- 0.01 mg/l
-
- Collected
- May 4, 2009
- Sampling point
- SM1 County Barn
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 090505-019HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
-
- Collected
- Apr 28, 2008
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 080429-022HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Apr 1, 2008 – Jun 30, 2008
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- Not detected below 0.006 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Jan 29, 2008
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 080130-014HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Mar 31, 2008
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- 0.009 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Oct 16, 2007
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 071017-015HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Oct 1, 2007 – Dec 31, 2007
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- 0.0068 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
Routine (10).