This is a rebuild of Drinking Water Watch and not yet the official record. Use the agency’s current Drinking Water Watch for anything you need to rely on.
Chemical and radiological sample results
MS0060001 , Town of Alligator
22 of the 57 analytes this system has been tested for have been detected at least once, across 250 samples on record.
The other 35 were tested for and never found. An analyte is counted here if any result on record measured it, so this covers the whole history and not the samples listed below.
Across all 250 samples on record, detections range from November 11, 1993 to December 16, 2025. These figures cover the whole record.
What counts as a non-detect is defined in the help: Less than Indicator. This system’s violations.
What has been detected, ever
Every analyte measured above its reporting level at any point in this system’s record, most often detected first. This is not limited to the samples listed below.
| Analyte | Kind | Detected in | First detected | Last detected |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper, Free 1022 | Inorganic Chemical | 61 of 74 results | Nov 11, 1993 | Sep 2, 2025 |
| Lead 1030 | Inorganic Chemical | 43 of 74 results | Nov 11, 1993 | Sep 2, 2025 |
| TTHM 2950 | Organic Chemical | 22 of 23 results | Sep 27, 2004 | Mar 29, 2023 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Organic Chemical | 21 of 22 results | Sep 27, 2004 | Mar 29, 2023 |
| Barium 1010 | Inorganic Chemical | 17 of 17 results | Jan 29, 2002 | Dec 16, 2025 |
| Fluoride 1025 | Inorganic Chemical | 17 of 17 results | Jan 29, 2002 | Dec 16, 2025 |
| Chromium 1020 | Inorganic Chemical | 14 of 17 results | Jan 29, 2002 | Dec 16, 2025 |
| Chloroform 2941 | Organic Chemical | 11 of 15 results | May 17, 2006 | Jul 2, 2014 |
| Gross Alpha, Incl. Radon & U 4002 | Radionuclide | 10 of 10 results | Dec 7, 2011 | Jul 12, 2012 |
| Bromodichloromethane 2943 | Organic Chemical | 9 of 15 results | May 17, 2006 | Apr 22, 2009 |
| Dibromochloromethane 2944 | Organic Chemical | 7 of 15 results | Jul 31, 2006 | Mar 9, 2009 |
| Arsenic 1005 | Inorganic Chemical | 5 of 17 results | Jan 26, 2004 | Dec 16, 2025 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 | Organic Chemical | 5 of 7 results | Jan 28, 2008 | Jul 26, 2017 |
| Nickel 1036 | Inorganic Chemical | 5 of 17 results | Jan 24, 2006 | May 5, 2014 |
| Sodium 1052 | Inorganic Chemical | 3 of 3 results | Sep 24, 2019 | Dec 4, 2024 |
| Bromoform 2942 | Organic Chemical | 3 of 15 results | Apr 23, 2007 | Mar 9, 2009 |
| Selenium 1045 | Inorganic Chemical | 3 of 17 results | Jan 24, 2006 | Mar 10, 2008 |
| Xylenes, Total 2955 | Organic Chemical | 2 of 39 results | Sep 29, 2011 | Sep 29, 2011 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 | Organic Chemical | 1 of 7 results | Jul 26, 2017 | Jul 26, 2017 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 | Organic Chemical | 1 of 7 results | Jan 28, 2008 | Jan 28, 2008 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 | Organic Chemical | 1 of 7 results | Jan 28, 2008 | Jan 28, 2008 |
| Cadmium 1015 | Inorganic Chemical | 1 of 17 results | Jan 24, 2006 | Jan 24, 2006 |
No date range is applied: this list draws on every sample on record. Show the last two years only.
The most recent samples, result by result
The table below lists 141–150 of 250 samples, newest first — collected May 7, 2008 to October 27, 2008. The summary above covers all 250.
32 results from the 10 samples listed here: 14 detected, 18 not detected. Across the whole record it is 262 of 1,478. A sample is analysed for many analytes at once, so one sample appears on as many rows as it had results.
Units in this table
TTHM is recorded on this page in ug/l and mg/l. 1 mg/l = 1,000 ug/l.
| Result | Analyte | Monitoring period |
|---|---|---|
|
||
| 1.39 ug/l , sample collected Oct 27, 2008, sampling point MRT000 | Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Oct 27, 2008, sampling point MRT000 | Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Oct 27, 2008, sampling point MRT000 | Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Oct 27, 2008, sampling point MRT000 | Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| 1.39 ug/l , sample collected Oct 27, 2008, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Oct 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008 |
|
||
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 28, 2008, sampling point MRT000 | Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 28, 2008, sampling point MRT000 | Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 28, 2008, sampling point MRT000 | Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 28, 2008, sampling point MRT000 | Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Aug 28, 2008, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Jul 1, 2008 – Sep 30, 2008 |
|
||
| Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 28, 2008, sampling point MRT000 | Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| 0.001 mg/l , sample collected Aug 28, 2008, sampling point MRT000 | Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 28, 2008, sampling point MRT000 | Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 28, 2008, sampling point MRT000 | Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 28, 2008, sampling point MRT000 | Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| 0 mg/l This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. , sample collected Aug 28, 2008, sampling point MRT000 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Jul 1, 2008 – Sep 30, 2008 |
|
||
| 0.0822 mg/l , sample collected Jul 10, 2008, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
| 0.0014 mg/l , sample collected Jul 10, 2008, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
|
||
| 0.136 mg/l , sample collected Jul 10, 2008, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
| 0.0065 mg/l , sample collected Jul 10, 2008, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
|
||
| 0.1343 mg/l , sample collected Jul 10, 2008, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
| 0.0018 mg/l , sample collected Jul 10, 2008, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
|
||
| 0.013 mg/l , sample collected Jul 10, 2008, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
| 0.0011 mg/l , sample collected Jul 10, 2008, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
|
||
| 0.4217 mg/l , sample collected Jul 10, 2008, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 10, 2008, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
|
||
| Not detected below 0.1 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected May 7, 2008, sampling point TF101 | Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008 |
| Not detected below 0.08 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected May 7, 2008, sampling point TF101 | Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008 |
| Not detected below 0.02 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected May 7, 2008, sampling point TF101 | Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008 |
|
||
| Not detected below 0.1 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected May 7, 2008, sampling point TF102 | Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008 |
| Not detected below 0.08 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected May 7, 2008, sampling point TF102 | Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008 |
| Not detected below 0.02 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected May 7, 2008, sampling point TF102 | Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008 |
-
- Collected
- Oct 27, 2008
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 081028-005TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
-
Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 1.39 ug/l
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 1.39 ug/l
- Monitoring period
- Oct 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008
-
- Collected
- Aug 28, 2008
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 080829-017TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
-
Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
- Monitoring period
- Jul 1, 2008 – Sep 30, 2008
-
- Collected
- Aug 28, 2008
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 080829-017HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
-
Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- 0.001 mg/l
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- 0 mg/l This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here.
- Monitoring period
- Jul 1, 2008 – Sep 30, 2008
-
- Collected
- Jul 10, 2008
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 080711-047PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0822 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0014 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Jul 10, 2008
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 080711-046PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.136 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0065 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Jul 10, 2008
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 080711-045PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.1343 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0018 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Jul 10, 2008
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 080711-044PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.013 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0011 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Jul 10, 2008
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 080711-043PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.4217 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- May 7, 2008
- Sampling point
- TF101 Treatment Plant T101
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 080508-015NI
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008
-
Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.1 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.08 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.02 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- May 7, 2008
- Sampling point
- TF102 Treatment Plant T102
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 080508-014NI
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008
-
Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.1 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.08 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.02 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
Routine (10).