This is a rebuild of Drinking Water Watch and not yet the official record. Use the agency’s current Drinking Water Watch for anything you need to rely on.
TTHM results
MS0060020 , Town of Winstonville
57 samples have been analysed for TTHM at Town of Winstonville.
This is one analyte out of the system’s whole record. For what has ever been detected here, and when, see all chemical and radiological results; for everything the system is tested for, see the analyte list.
What counts as a non-detect is defined in the help: Less than Indicator. This system’s violations.
No date range is applied: this list draws on every sample on record. Show the last two years only.
Every TTHM result
The table below lists 31–40 of 57 samples, newest first — collected May 12, 2010 to August 13, 2012.
10 TTHM results from the 10 samples listed here: 10 detected, 0 not detected. Those samples also carried 40 results for other analytes, which are on the full results page.
Units in this table
TTHM is recorded on this page in ug/l and mg/l. 1 mg/l = 1,000 ug/l.
| Result | Analyte | Monitoring period |
|---|---|---|
|
||
| 3.42 ug/l , sample collected Aug 13, 2012 12:06, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Jul 1, 2012 – Sep 30, 2012 |
|
||
| 65.5 ug/l , sample collected Apr 16, 2012 12:14, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Apr 1, 2012 – Jun 30, 2012 |
|
||
| 76 ug/l , sample collected Feb 13, 2012 12:32, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Jan 1, 2012 – Mar 31, 2012 |
|
||
| 90.3 ug/l , sample collected Nov 14, 2011 01:07, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Oct 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2011 |
|
||
| 64 ug/l , sample collected Aug 15, 2011 12:35, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Jul 1, 2011 – Sep 30, 2011 |
|
||
| 53.1 ug/l , sample collected May 9, 2011, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Apr 1, 2011 – Jun 30, 2011 |
|
||
| 61 ug/l , sample collected Feb 14, 2011, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Jan 1, 2011 – Mar 31, 2011 |
|
||
| 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Nov 15, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Oct 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| 82.53 ug/l , sample collected Jul 19, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Jul 1, 2010 – Sep 30, 2010 |
|
||
| 44.93 ug/l , sample collected May 12, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Apr 1, 2010 – Jun 30, 2010 |
-
- Collected
- Aug 13, 2012 12:06
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 120814-003TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jul 1, 2012 – Sep 30, 2012
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 3.42 ug/l
-
- Collected
- Apr 16, 2012 12:14
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 120417-004TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Apr 1, 2012 – Jun 30, 2012
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 65.5 ug/l
-
- Collected
- Feb 13, 2012 12:32
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 120214-008TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2012 – Mar 31, 2012
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 76 ug/l
-
- Collected
- Nov 14, 2011 01:07
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 111115-019TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Oct 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2011
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 90.3 ug/l
-
- Collected
- Aug 15, 2011 12:35
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 110816-023TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jul 1, 2011 – Sep 30, 2011
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 64 ug/l
-
- Collected
- May 9, 2011
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 110510-001TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Apr 1, 2011 – Jun 30, 2011
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 53.1 ug/l
-
- Collected
- Feb 14, 2011
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 110215-016TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2011 – Mar 31, 2011
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 61 ug/l
-
- Collected
- Nov 15, 2010
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 101116-008TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Oct 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
-
- Collected
- Jul 19, 2010
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100720-008TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jul 1, 2010 – Sep 30, 2010
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 82.53 ug/l
-
- Collected
- May 12, 2010
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100513-006TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Apr 1, 2010 – Jun 30, 2010
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 44.93 ug/l
Routine (10).