This is a rebuild of Drinking Water Watch and not yet the official record. Use the agency’s current Drinking Water Watch for anything you need to rely on.
Chemical and radiological sample results
MS0060042 , Symonds Water Association
25 of the 58 analytes this system has been tested for have been detected at least once, across 184 samples on record.
The other 33 were tested for and never found. An analyte is counted here if any result on record measured it, so this covers the whole history and not the samples listed below.
Across all 184 samples on record, detections range from October 18, 1993 to December 16, 2025. These figures cover the whole record.
What counts as a non-detect is defined in the help: Less than Indicator. This system’s violations.
What has been detected, ever
Every analyte measured above its reporting level at any point in this system’s record, most often detected first. This is not limited to the samples listed below.
| Analyte | Kind | Detected in | First detected | Last detected |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper, Free 1022 | Inorganic Chemical | 43 of 77 results | May 23, 1994 | Sep 26, 2024 |
| Lead 1030 | Inorganic Chemical | 39 of 77 results | Oct 18, 1993 | Sep 26, 2024 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Organic Chemical | 13 of 14 results | Jun 25, 2007 | Feb 19, 2025 |
| TTHM 2950 | Organic Chemical | 12 of 14 results | Jun 25, 2007 | Feb 19, 2025 |
| Barium 1010 | Inorganic Chemical | 11 of 11 results | Jun 25, 2002 | Dec 16, 2025 |
| Fluoride 1025 | Inorganic Chemical | 11 of 11 results | Jun 25, 2002 | Dec 16, 2025 |
| Chromium 1020 | Inorganic Chemical | 8 of 11 results | Jun 25, 2002 | Dec 16, 2025 |
| Chloroform 2941 | Organic Chemical | 8 of 11 results | Jun 25, 2007 | Aug 16, 2017 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 | Organic Chemical | 7 of 9 results | Jan 28, 2008 | Aug 16, 2017 |
| Arsenic 1005 | Inorganic Chemical | 6 of 11 results | Jun 25, 2002 | Dec 16, 2025 |
| Selenium 1045 | Inorganic Chemical | 6 of 11 results | Jun 25, 2002 | Dec 16, 2025 |
| Bromodichloromethane 2943 | Organic Chemical | 4 of 11 results | Jun 25, 2007 | Aug 16, 2017 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 | Organic Chemical | 3 of 9 results | Jan 28, 2008 | Aug 16, 2017 |
| Nickel 1036 | Inorganic Chemical | 2 of 11 results | Mar 10, 2008 | Dec 16, 2025 |
| Gross Alpha Particle Activity 4109 | Radionuclide | 2 of 4 results | Jun 27, 2012 | Sep 17, 2012 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 | Organic Chemical | 2 of 9 results | Apr 30, 2008 | Jun 22, 2011 |
| Dibromochloromethane 2944 | Organic Chemical | 2 of 11 results | Jun 25, 2007 | Jun 22, 2011 |
| Sodium 1052 | Inorganic Chemical | 1 of 1 result | Sep 30, 2019 | Sep 30, 2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 | Inorganic Chemical | 1 of 22 results | Jan 18, 2017 | Jan 18, 2017 |
| Nitrate 1040 | Inorganic Chemical | 1 of 22 results | Jan 18, 2017 | Jan 18, 2017 |
| P-Dichlorobenzene 2969 | Organic Chemical | 1 of 28 results | Dec 19, 2016 | Dec 19, 2016 |
| Xylenes, Total 2955 | Organic Chemical | 1 of 28 results | Sep 29, 2011 | Sep 29, 2011 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 | Organic Chemical | 1 of 9 results | Jun 22, 2011 | Jun 22, 2011 |
| Cadmium 1015 | Inorganic Chemical | 1 of 11 results | Mar 10, 2008 | Mar 10, 2008 |
| Bromoform 2942 | Organic Chemical | 1 of 11 results | Jun 25, 2007 | Jun 25, 2007 |
No date range is applied: this list draws on every sample on record. Show the last two years only.
The most recent samples, result by result
The table below lists 91–100 of 184 samples, newest first — collected August 27, 2008 to January 18, 2011. The summary above covers all 184.
47 results from the 10 samples listed here: 9 detected, 38 not detected. Across the whole record it is 187 of 1,076. A sample is analysed for many analytes at once, so one sample appears on as many rows as it had results.
Units in this table
TTHM is recorded on this page in ug/l and mg/l. 1 mg/l = 1,000 ug/l.
| Result | Analyte | Monitoring period |
|---|---|---|
|
||
| Not detected below 0.1 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jan 18, 2011, sampling point TF101 | Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2011 |
| Not detected below 0.08 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jan 18, 2011, sampling point TF101 | Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2011 |
| Not detected below 0.02 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jan 18, 2011, sampling point TF101 | Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2011 |
|
||
| Not detected below 0.25 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 28, 2010, sampling point TF101 | Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| Not detected below 0.2 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 28, 2010, sampling point TF101 | Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| Not detected below 0.05 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 28, 2010, sampling point TF101 | Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Apr 22, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Apr 22, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Apr 22, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Apr 22, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Apr 22, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Apr 1, 2009 – Jun 30, 2009 |
|
||
| Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Apr 22, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| 0.001 mg/l , sample collected Apr 22, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Apr 22, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Apr 22, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Apr 22, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| 0 mg/l This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. , sample collected Apr 22, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Apr 1, 2009 – Jun 30, 2009 |
|
||
| Not detected below 0.25 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Mar 9, 2009, sampling point TF101 | Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009 |
| Not detected below 0.2 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Mar 9, 2009, sampling point TF101 | Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009 |
| Not detected below 0.05 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Mar 9, 2009, sampling point TF101 | Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009 |
|
||
| Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jan 14, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jan 14, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jan 14, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jan 14, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jan 14, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Jan 14, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Jan 1, 2009 – Mar 31, 2009 |
|
||
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jan 14, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jan 14, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jan 14, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jan 14, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 4 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jan 14, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Jan 1, 2009 – Mar 31, 2009 |
|
||
| Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Oct 27, 2008, sampling point MRT000 | Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| 0.002 mg/l , sample collected Oct 27, 2008, sampling point MRT000 | Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Oct 27, 2008, sampling point MRT000 | Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Oct 27, 2008, sampling point MRT000 | Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Oct 27, 2008, sampling point MRT000 | Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| 0 mg/l This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. , sample collected Oct 27, 2008, sampling point MRT000 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Oct 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008 |
|
||
| 1.34 ug/l , sample collected Oct 27, 2008, sampling point MRT000 | Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Oct 27, 2008, sampling point MRT000 | Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Oct 27, 2008, sampling point MRT000 | Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Oct 27, 2008, sampling point MRT000 | Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| 1.34 ug/l , sample collected Oct 27, 2008, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Oct 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008 |
|
||
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 27, 2008, sampling point MRT000 | Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 27, 2008, sampling point MRT000 | Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 27, 2008, sampling point MRT000 | Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 27, 2008, sampling point MRT000 | Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Aug 27, 2008, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Jul 1, 2008 – Sep 30, 2008 |
-
- Collected
- Jan 18, 2011
- Sampling point
- TF101 Treatment Plant T101
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 110119-074NI
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2011
-
Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.1 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.08 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.02 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Jun 28, 2010
- Sampling point
- TF101 Treatment Plant T101
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100629-036NI
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.25 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.2 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.05 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Apr 22, 2009
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 090423-009TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
-
Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
- Monitoring period
- Apr 1, 2009 – Jun 30, 2009
-
- Collected
- Apr 22, 2009
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 090423-009HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
-
Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- 0.001 mg/l
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- 0 mg/l This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here.
- Monitoring period
- Apr 1, 2009 – Jun 30, 2009
-
- Collected
- Mar 9, 2009
- Sampling point
- TF101 Treatment Plant T101
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 090310-015NI
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009
-
Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.25 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.2 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.05 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Jan 14, 2009
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 090115-004HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
-
Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2009 – Mar 31, 2009
-
- Collected
- Jan 14, 2009
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 090115-004TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
-
Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 4 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2009 – Mar 31, 2009
-
- Collected
- Oct 27, 2008
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 081028-001HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
-
Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- 0.002 mg/l
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- 0 mg/l This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here.
- Monitoring period
- Oct 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008
-
- Collected
- Oct 27, 2008
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 081028-001TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
-
Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 1.34 ug/l
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 1.34 ug/l
- Monitoring period
- Oct 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008
-
- Collected
- Aug 27, 2008
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 080828-020TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
-
Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
- Monitoring period
- Jul 1, 2008 – Sep 30, 2008
Routine (10).