This is a rebuild of Drinking Water Watch and not yet the official record. Use the agency’s current Drinking Water Watch for anything you need to rely on.
TTHM results
MS0090004 , Houlka-Houston W/A
26 samples have been analysed for TTHM at Houlka-Houston W/A.
This is one analyte out of the system’s whole record. For what has ever been detected here, and when, see all chemical and radiological results; for everything the system is tested for, see the analyte list.
What counts as a non-detect is defined in the help: Less than Indicator. This system’s violations.
No date range is applied: this list draws on every sample on record. Show the last two years only.
Every TTHM result
The table below lists 21–26 of 26 samples, newest first — collected May 17, 2004 to July 17, 2018.
6 TTHM results from the 6 samples listed here: 4 detected, 2 not detected. Those samples also carried 20 results for other analytes, which are on the full results page.
Units in this table
TTHM is recorded on this page in ug/l and mg/l. 1 mg/l = 1,000 ug/l.
| Result | Analyte | Monitoring period |
|---|---|---|
|
||
| Not detected below 4 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 17, 2018 01:45, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 | Jan 1, 2017 – Dec 31, 2019 |
|
||
| 6 ug/l , sample collected Aug 18, 2014 03:30, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Jan 1, 2014 – Dec 31, 2016 |
|
||
| Not detected below 4 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 14, 2011 02:10, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013 |
|
||
| 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Aug 13, 2008, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Jul 18, 2007, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007 |
|
||
| 7.27 ug/l , sample collected May 17, 2004, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Jan 1, 2004 – Dec 31, 2004 |
-
- Collected
- Jul 17, 2018 01:45
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 180718-015TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2017 – Dec 31, 2019
-
TTHM 2950
- Result
- Not detected below 4 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Aug 18, 2014 03:30
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 140819-023TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2014 – Dec 31, 2016
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 6 ug/l
-
- Collected
- Jul 14, 2011 02:10
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 110715-004TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 4 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Aug 13, 2008
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 080814-004TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
-
- Collected
- Jul 18, 2007
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 070719-006TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
-
- Collected
- May 17, 2004
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 040518-038TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2004 – Dec 31, 2004
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 7.27 ug/l
Routine (6).