This is a rebuild of Drinking Water Watch and not yet the official record. Use the agency’s current Drinking Water Watch for anything you need to rely on.
Chemical and radiological sample results
MS0120011 , East Quitman W/A
29 of the 57 analytes this system has been tested for have been detected at least once, across 601 samples on record.
The other 28 were tested for and never found. An analyte is counted here if any result on record measured it, so this covers the whole history and not the samples listed below.
Across all 601 samples on record, detections range from March 9, 1993 to February 19, 2026. These figures cover the whole record.
What counts as a non-detect is defined in the help: Less than Indicator. This system’s violations.
What has been detected, ever
Every analyte measured above its reporting level at any point in this system’s record, most often detected first. This is not limited to the samples listed below.
| Analyte | Kind | Detected in | First detected | Last detected |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper, Free 1022 | Inorganic Chemical | 316 of 327 results | Mar 9, 1993 | Jul 9, 2024 |
| Lead 1030 | Inorganic Chemical | 219 of 327 results | Mar 9, 1993 | Jul 9, 2024 |
| Barium 1010 | Inorganic Chemical | 38 of 38 results | Mar 19, 2002 | Jan 14, 2025 |
| TTHM 2950 | Organic Chemical | 31 of 31 results | May 10, 2004 | Sep 29, 2025 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Organic Chemical | 28 of 30 results | May 10, 2004 | Feb 19, 2026 |
| Fluoride 1025 | Inorganic Chemical | 26 of 38 results | Mar 19, 2002 | Jan 14, 2025 |
| Chromium 1020 | Inorganic Chemical | 25 of 38 results | Mar 19, 2002 | Jan 14, 2025 |
| Chloroform 2941 | Organic Chemical | 21 of 21 results | Sep 12, 2006 | Sep 29, 2025 |
| Bromodichloromethane 2943 | Organic Chemical | 19 of 21 results | Sep 12, 2006 | Sep 29, 2025 |
| Dibromochloromethane 2944 | Organic Chemical | 19 of 21 results | Sep 12, 2006 | Sep 29, 2025 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 | Organic Chemical | 16 of 17 results | Jun 25, 2008 | Feb 19, 2026 |
| Nickel 1036 | Inorganic Chemical | 16 of 38 results | Jan 26, 2004 | Jan 14, 2025 |
| Bromoform 2942 | Organic Chemical | 12 of 21 results | Sep 12, 2006 | Sep 29, 2025 |
| Selenium 1045 | Inorganic Chemical | 11 of 38 results | Jan 26, 2004 | May 2, 2017 |
| Gross Alpha Particle Activity 4109 | Radionuclide | 11 of 16 results | Aug 22, 2011 | May 29, 2013 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 | Organic Chemical | 10 of 17 results | May 4, 2009 | Feb 19, 2026 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 | Organic Chemical | 9 of 17 results | May 4, 2009 | Feb 19, 2026 |
| Sodium 1052 | Inorganic Chemical | 8 of 8 results | Feb 1, 2021 | Oct 16, 2024 |
| Cadmium 1015 | Inorganic Chemical | 6 of 38 results | Feb 14, 2005 | May 2, 2011 |
| Arsenic 1005 | Inorganic Chemical | 5 of 38 results | Jan 23, 2006 | May 11, 2022 |
| Combined Radium (-226 & -228) 4010 | Radionuclide | 5 of 15 results | Aug 22, 2011 | Dec 10, 2012 |
| Radium-226 4020 | Radionuclide | 5 of 15 results | Aug 22, 2011 | Dec 10, 2012 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 | Organic Chemical | 3 of 17 results | Nov 2, 2009 | Jul 17, 2018 |
| Nitrite 1041 | Inorganic Chemical | 2 of 80 results | Apr 9, 2007 | Jan 29, 2019 |
| Sulfate 1055 | Inorganic Chemical | 2 of 6 results | Mar 19, 2002 | Jan 26, 2004 |
| Combined Uranium 4006 | Radionuclide | 1 of 14 results | Jan 30, 2013 | Jan 30, 2013 |
| Antimony, Total 1074 | Inorganic Chemical | 1 of 38 results | May 2, 2011 | May 2, 2011 |
| Nitrate 1040 | Inorganic Chemical | 1 of 80 results | Jun 7, 2006 | Jun 7, 2006 |
| Cyanide 1024 | Inorganic Chemical | 1 of 30 results | Mar 19, 2002 | Mar 19, 2002 |
No date range is applied: this list draws on every sample on record. Show the last two years only.
The most recent samples, result by result
The table below lists 291–300 of 601 samples, newest first — collected August 13, 2009 to May 24, 2010. The summary above covers all 601.
52 results from the 10 samples listed here: 26 detected, 26 not detected. Across the whole record it is 867 of 2,315. A sample is analysed for many analytes at once, so one sample appears on as many rows as it had results.
We withheld the location of 2 sampling points below. The location on record identifies a private home, and we do not publish those. That is our decision, not the agency’s. The sampling point, its type and every result taken there are published unchanged.
| Result | Analyte | Monitoring period |
|---|---|---|
|
||
| Not detected below 0.25 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected May 24, 2010, sampling point TF080 | Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| Not detected below 0.2 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected May 24, 2010, sampling point TF080 | Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| Not detected below 0.05 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected May 24, 2010, sampling point TF080 | Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 1, 2010, sampling point SM2 | Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 1, 2010, sampling point SM2 | Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 1, 2010, sampling point SM2 | Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 1, 2010, sampling point SM2 | Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 1, 2010, sampling point SM2 | Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Feb 1, 2010, sampling point SM2 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Not recorded |
|
||
| Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 1, 2010, sampling point SM1 | Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| 0.001 mg/l , sample collected Feb 1, 2010, sampling point SM1 | Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 1, 2010, sampling point SM1 | Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 1, 2010, sampling point SM1 | Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 1, 2010, sampling point SM1 | Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| 0 mg/l This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. , sample collected Feb 1, 2010, sampling point SM1 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Not recorded |
|
||
| 2.14 ug/l , sample collected Feb 1, 2010, sampling point SM2 | Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 1, 2010, sampling point SM2 | Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 1, 2010, sampling point SM2 | Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 1, 2010, sampling point SM2 | Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| 2.14 ug/l , sample collected Feb 1, 2010, sampling point SM2 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
|
||
| 3.17 ug/l , sample collected Feb 1, 2010, sampling point SM1 | Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 1, 2010, sampling point SM1 | Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| 2.58 ug/l , sample collected Feb 1, 2010, sampling point SM1 | Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| 2.02 ug/l , sample collected Feb 1, 2010, sampling point SM1 | Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| 7.77 ug/l , sample collected Feb 1, 2010, sampling point SM1 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
|
||
| 0.003 mg/l , sample collected Nov 2, 2009, sampling point SM2 | Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| 0.002 mg/l , sample collected Nov 2, 2009, sampling point SM2 | Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Nov 2, 2009, sampling point SM2 | Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Nov 2, 2009, sampling point SM2 | Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Nov 2, 2009, sampling point SM2 | Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| 0 mg/l This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. , sample collected Nov 2, 2009, sampling point SM2 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Not recorded |
|
||
| 0.003 mg/l , sample collected Nov 2, 2009, sampling point SM1 | Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| 0.002 mg/l , sample collected Nov 2, 2009, sampling point SM1 | Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Nov 2, 2009, sampling point SM1 | Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Nov 2, 2009, sampling point SM1 | Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Nov 2, 2009, sampling point SM1 | Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| 0 mg/l This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. , sample collected Nov 2, 2009, sampling point SM1 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Not recorded |
|
||
| 2.27 ug/l , sample collected Nov 2, 2009, sampling point SM2 | Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Nov 2, 2009, sampling point SM2 | Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Nov 2, 2009, sampling point SM2 | Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Nov 2, 2009, sampling point SM2 | Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| 2.27 ug/l , sample collected Nov 2, 2009, sampling point SM2 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
|
||
| 3.15 ug/l , sample collected Nov 2, 2009, sampling point SM1 | Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Nov 2, 2009, sampling point SM1 | Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| 2.05 ug/l , sample collected Nov 2, 2009, sampling point SM1 | Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| 1.98 ug/l , sample collected Nov 2, 2009, sampling point SM1 | Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| 7.18 ug/l , sample collected Nov 2, 2009, sampling point SM1 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
|
||
| 4.12 ug/l , sample collected Aug 13, 2009, sampling point SM1 | Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| 1.62 ug/l , sample collected Aug 13, 2009, sampling point SM1 | Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| 2.68 ug/l , sample collected Aug 13, 2009, sampling point SM1 | Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| 3.14 ug/l , sample collected Aug 13, 2009, sampling point SM1 | Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| 11.56 ug/l , sample collected Aug 13, 2009, sampling point SM1 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
-
- Collected
- May 24, 2010
- Sampling point
- TF080 Treatment Plant T080
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100525-027NI
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.25 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.2 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.05 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Feb 1, 2010
- Sampling point
- SM2 Location withheld
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100202-016HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
-
- Collected
- Feb 1, 2010
- Sampling point
- SM1 Location withheld
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100202-015HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- 0.001 mg/l
-
Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- 0 mg/l This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here.
-
- Collected
- Feb 1, 2010
- Sampling point
- SM2 Location withheld
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100202-016TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 2.14 ug/l
-
Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 2.14 ug/l
-
- Collected
- Feb 1, 2010
- Sampling point
- SM1 Location withheld
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100202-015TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 3.17 ug/l
-
Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 2.58 ug/l
-
Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 2.02 ug/l
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 7.77 ug/l
-
- Collected
- Nov 2, 2009
- Sampling point
- SM2 Location withheld
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 091103-014HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- 0.003 mg/l
-
Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- 0.002 mg/l
-
Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- 0 mg/l This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here.
-
- Collected
- Nov 2, 2009
- Sampling point
- SM1 Location withheld
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 091103-013HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- 0.003 mg/l
-
Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- 0.002 mg/l
-
Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- 0 mg/l This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here.
-
- Collected
- Nov 2, 2009
- Sampling point
- SM2 Location withheld
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 091103-034TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 2.27 ug/l
-
Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 2.27 ug/l
-
- Collected
- Nov 2, 2009
- Sampling point
- SM1 Location withheld
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 091103-033TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 3.15 ug/l
-
Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 2.05 ug/l
-
Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 1.98 ug/l
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 7.18 ug/l
-
- Collected
- Aug 13, 2009
- Sampling point
- SM1 Location withheld
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 090814-015TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 4.12 ug/l
-
Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 1.62 ug/l
-
Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 2.68 ug/l
-
Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 3.14 ug/l
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 11.56 ug/l
Routine (10).