This is a rebuild of Drinking Water Watch and not yet the official record. Use the agency’s current Drinking Water Watch for anything you need to rely on.
Chemical and radiological sample results
MS0140051 , Moore Bayou W/A #2
23 of the 57 analytes this system has been tested for have been detected at least once, across 381 samples on record.
The other 34 were tested for and never found. An analyte is counted here if any result on record measured it, so this covers the whole history and not the samples listed below.
Across all 381 samples on record, detections range from May 14, 2002 to February 3, 2025. These figures cover the whole record.
What counts as a non-detect is defined in the help: Less than Indicator. This system’s violations.
What has been detected, ever
Every analyte measured above its reporting level at any point in this system’s record, most often detected first. This is not limited to the samples listed below.
| Analyte | Kind | Detected in | First detected | Last detected |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper, Free 1022 | Inorganic Chemical | 197 of 197 results | Dec 16, 2003 | Aug 30, 2023 |
| Lead 1030 | Inorganic Chemical | 172 of 197 results | Dec 16, 2003 | Aug 30, 2023 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Organic Chemical | 56 of 62 results | May 17, 2004 | Aug 16, 2023 |
| TTHM 2950 | Organic Chemical | 52 of 59 results | May 17, 2004 | Aug 16, 2023 |
| Bromodichloromethane 2943 | Organic Chemical | 36 of 49 results | Sep 12, 2006 | Nov 14, 2017 |
| Dibromochloromethane 2944 | Organic Chemical | 36 of 49 results | Sep 12, 2006 | Nov 14, 2017 |
| Bromoform 2942 | Organic Chemical | 35 of 49 results | Sep 12, 2006 | Nov 14, 2017 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 | Organic Chemical | 34 of 46 results | Jan 29, 2008 | Nov 14, 2017 |
| Chloroform 2941 | Organic Chemical | 32 of 49 results | Sep 12, 2006 | Nov 14, 2017 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 | Organic Chemical | 19 of 46 results | Jul 7, 2009 | Oct 27, 2014 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 | Organic Chemical | 13 of 46 results | Jul 7, 2009 | Oct 27, 2014 |
| Barium 1010 | Inorganic Chemical | 12 of 12 results | May 14, 2002 | Feb 3, 2025 |
| Fluoride 1025 | Inorganic Chemical | 12 of 12 results | May 14, 2002 | Feb 3, 2025 |
| Selenium 1045 | Inorganic Chemical | 12 of 12 results | May 14, 2002 | Feb 3, 2025 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 | Organic Chemical | 12 of 46 results | Jan 29, 2008 | Jul 7, 2014 |
| Arsenic 1005 | Inorganic Chemical | 9 of 12 results | Jan 26, 2004 | Feb 3, 2025 |
| Chromium 1020 | Inorganic Chemical | 9 of 12 results | May 14, 2002 | May 9, 2022 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 | Organic Chemical | 5 of 46 results | Oct 5, 2009 | Jan 4, 2010 |
| Nickel 1036 | Inorganic Chemical | 3 of 12 results | Mar 1, 2005 | Apr 21, 2014 |
| Sodium 1052 | Inorganic Chemical | 2 of 2 results | Feb 1, 2021 | Oct 21, 2024 |
| Nitrite 1041 | Inorganic Chemical | 2 of 23 results | Apr 16, 2007 | Mar 21, 2016 |
| Cadmium 1015 | Inorganic Chemical | 1 of 12 results | Mar 1, 2005 | Mar 1, 2005 |
| Sulfate 1055 | Inorganic Chemical | 1 of 3 results | Sep 8, 2003 | Sep 8, 2003 |
No date range is applied: this list draws on every sample on record. Show the last two years only.
The most recent samples, result by result
The table below lists 171–180 of 381 samples, newest first — collected June 8, 2010 to May 4, 2011. The summary above covers all 381.
51 results from the 10 samples listed here: 19 detected, 32 not detected. Across the whole record it is 762 of 1,329. A sample is analysed for many analytes at once, so one sample appears on as many rows as it had results.
Units in this table
TTHM is recorded on this page in ug/l and mg/l. 1 mg/l = 1,000 ug/l.
| Result | Analyte | Monitoring period |
|---|---|---|
|
||
| 0.0009 mg/l , sample collected May 4, 2011, sampling point TF101 | Arsenic 1005 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013 |
| 0.0081 mg/l , sample collected May 4, 2011, sampling point TF101 | Barium 1010 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected May 4, 2011, sampling point TF101 | Cadmium 1015 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected May 4, 2011, sampling point TF101 | Chromium 1020 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013 |
| 0.361 mg/l , sample collected May 4, 2011, sampling point TF101 | Fluoride 1025 EPA method 380-75WE | Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected May 4, 2011, sampling point TF101 | Mercury 1035 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected May 4, 2011, sampling point TF101 | Nickel 1036 EPA method 200.8 | Not recorded |
| 0.0034 mg/l , sample collected May 4, 2011, sampling point TF101 | Selenium 1045 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected May 4, 2011, sampling point TF101 | Antimony, Total 1074 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected May 4, 2011, sampling point TF101 | Beryllium, Total 1075 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected May 4, 2011, sampling point TF101 | Thallium, Total 1085 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013 |
|
||
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 16, 2011, sampling point MRT000 | Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 16, 2011, sampling point MRT000 | Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 16, 2011, sampling point MRT000 | Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 16, 2011, sampling point MRT000 | Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 4 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 16, 2011, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Jan 1, 2011 – Mar 31, 2011 |
|
||
| Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 16, 2011, sampling point MRT000 | Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 16, 2011, sampling point MRT000 | Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 16, 2011, sampling point MRT000 | Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 16, 2011, sampling point MRT000 | Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 16, 2011, sampling point MRT000 | Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Feb 16, 2011, sampling point MRT000 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Jan 1, 2011 – Mar 31, 2011 |
|
||
| Not detected below 0.1 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jan 24, 2011, sampling point TF101 | Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2011 |
| Not detected below 0.08 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jan 24, 2011, sampling point TF101 | Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2011 |
| Not detected below 0.02 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jan 24, 2011, sampling point TF101 | Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2011 |
|
||
| 3.06 ug/l , sample collected Nov 15, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| 34.2 ug/l , sample collected Nov 15, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| 10 ug/l , sample collected Nov 15, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| 31.5 ug/l , sample collected Nov 15, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| 78.76 ug/l , sample collected Nov 15, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Oct 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Nov 15, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| 0.001 mg/l , sample collected Nov 15, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| 0.001 mg/l , sample collected Nov 15, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Nov 15, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| 0.012 mg/l , sample collected Nov 15, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| 0.01 mg/l , sample collected Nov 15, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Oct 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 20, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 20, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 20, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 20, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 20, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Jul 20, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Jul 1, 2010 – Sep 30, 2010 |
|
||
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 20, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 20, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 20, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 20, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Jul 20, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Jul 1, 2010 – Sep 30, 2010 |
|
||
| 0.077 mg/l , sample collected Jun 8, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 8, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| 0.0162 mg/l , sample collected Jun 8, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| 0.0011 mg/l , sample collected Jun 8, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010 |
-
- Collected
- May 4, 2011
- Sampling point
- TF101 Treatment Plant T101
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 110505-021IN
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
-
Arsenic 1005 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0009 mg/l
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013
-
Barium 1010 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0081 mg/l
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013
-
Cadmium 1015 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013
-
Chromium 1020 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013
-
Fluoride 1025 EPA method 380-75WE
- Result
- 0.361 mg/l
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013
-
Mercury 1035 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013
-
Nickel 1036 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Selenium 1045 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0034 mg/l
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013
-
Antimony, Total 1074 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013
-
Beryllium, Total 1075 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013
-
Thallium, Total 1085 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013
-
- Collected
- Feb 16, 2011
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 110217-001TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
-
Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 4 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2011 – Mar 31, 2011
-
- Collected
- Feb 16, 2011
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 110217-001HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
-
Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2011 – Mar 31, 2011
-
- Collected
- Jan 24, 2011
- Sampling point
- TF101 Treatment Plant T101
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 110125-011NI
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2011
-
Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.1 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.08 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.02 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Nov 15, 2010
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 101116-001TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
-
Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 3.06 ug/l
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 34.2 ug/l
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 10 ug/l
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 31.5 ug/l
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 78.76 ug/l
- Monitoring period
- Oct 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010
-
- Collected
- Nov 15, 2010
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 101116-001HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
-
Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- 0.001 mg/l
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- 0.001 mg/l
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- 0.012 mg/l
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- 0.01 mg/l
- Monitoring period
- Oct 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010
-
- Collected
- Jul 20, 2010
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100721-001HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
-
Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
- Monitoring period
- Jul 1, 2010 – Sep 30, 2010
-
- Collected
- Jul 20, 2010
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100721-001TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
-
Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
- Monitoring period
- Jul 1, 2010 – Sep 30, 2010
-
- Collected
- Jun 8, 2010
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100610-035PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.077 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Jun 8, 2010
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100610-034PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0162 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0011 mg/l
Routine (10).