Alpha
This is a rebuild of Drinking Water Watch and not yet the official record. Use the agency’s current Drinking Water Watch for anything you need to rely on.
TTHM results
MS0150010 , Northeast Copiah Water Assn
40 samples have been analysed for TTHM at Northeast Copiah Water Assn.
This is one analyte out of the system’s whole record. For what has ever been detected here, and when, see all chemical and radiological results; for everything the system is tested for, see the analyte list.
What counts as a non-detect is defined in the help: Less than Indicator. This system’s violations.
No date range is applied: this list draws on every sample on record. Show the last two years only.
Every TTHM result
The table below lists 21–30 of 40 samples, newest first — collected February 21, 2007 to September 8, 2009.
10 TTHM results from the 10 samples listed here: 10 detected, 0 not detected. Those samples also carried 40 results for other analytes, which are on the full results page.
Units in this table
TTHM is recorded on this page in ug/l and mg/l. 1 mg/l = 1,000 ug/l.
We withheld the location of 2 sampling points below. The location on record identifies a private home, and we do not publish those. That is our decision, not the agency’s. The sampling point, its type and every result taken there are published unchanged.
| Result | Analyte | Monitoring period |
|---|---|---|
|
||
| 1.01 ug/l , sample collected Sep 8, 2009, sampling point SM2 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
|
||
| 1.58 ug/l , sample collected Sep 8, 2009, sampling point SM1 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
|
||
| 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Jun 9, 2009, sampling point SM2 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
|
||
| 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Jun 9, 2009, sampling point SM1 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
|
||
| 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Mar 9, 2009, sampling point SM2 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
|
||
| 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Mar 9, 2009, sampling point SM1 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
|
||
| 1.82 ug/l , sample collected Jun 25, 2008, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008 |
|
||
| 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Jul 17, 2007, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
|
||
| 66.33 ug/l , sample collected Apr 26, 2007, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Apr 1, 2007 – Jun 30, 2007 |
|
||
| 43.83 ug/l , sample collected Feb 21, 2007, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Jan 1, 2007 – Mar 31, 2007 |
-
- Collected
- Sep 8, 2009
- Sampling point
- SM2 Location withheld
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 090909-018TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 1.01 ug/l
-
- Collected
- Sep 8, 2009
- Sampling point
- SM1 Location withheld
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 090909-017TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 1.58 ug/l
-
- Collected
- Jun 9, 2009
- Sampling point
- SM2 Location withheld
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 090610-032TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
-
- Collected
- Jun 9, 2009
- Sampling point
- SM1 Location withheld
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 090610-031TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
-
- Collected
- Mar 9, 2009
- Sampling point
- SM2 Location withheld
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 090310-008TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
-
- Collected
- Mar 9, 2009
- Sampling point
- SM1 Location withheld
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 090310-007TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
-
- Collected
- Jun 25, 2008
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 080626-028TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 1.82 ug/l
-
- Collected
- Jul 17, 2007
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 070718-030TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
-
- Collected
- Apr 26, 2007
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 070426-010TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Apr 1, 2007 – Jun 30, 2007
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 66.33 ug/l
-
- Collected
- Feb 21, 2007
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 070222-003TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2007 – Mar 31, 2007
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 43.83 ug/l
Routine (10).