Skip to main content
Alpha

This is a rebuild of Drinking Water Watch and not yet the official record. Use the agency’s current Drinking Water Watch for anything you need to rely on.

Chemical and radiological sample results

MS0150010 , Northeast Copiah Water Assn

30 of the 58 analytes this system has been tested for have been detected at least once, across 506 samples on record.

The other 28 were tested for and never found. An analyte is counted here if any result on record measured it, so this covers the whole history and not the samples listed below.

Across all 506 samples on record, detections range from July 20, 1993 to August 5, 2025. These figures cover the whole record.

What counts as a non-detect is defined in the help: Less than Indicator. This system’s violations.

What has been detected, ever

Every analyte measured above its reporting level at any point in this system’s record, most often detected first. This is not limited to the samples listed below.

Every analyte ever detected for Northeast Copiah Water Assn, with how many results found it and when it was first and last detected. Covers the whole record, not only the samples listed below.
Analyte Kind Detected in First detected Last detected
Copper, Free 1022 Inorganic Chemical 226 of 228 results Jul 20, 1993 Aug 5, 2025
Lead 1030 Inorganic Chemical 198 of 228 results Jul 20, 1993 Aug 5, 2025
Barium 1010 Inorganic Chemical 34 of 34 results Apr 9, 2002 Apr 14, 2025
Fluoride 1025 Inorganic Chemical 27 of 34 results Apr 9, 2002 Apr 14, 2025
TTHM 2950 Organic Chemical 21 of 40 results Sep 22, 2004 Aug 26, 2024
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 Organic Chemical 20 of 35 results Sep 22, 2004 Dec 20, 2021
Nickel 1036 Inorganic Chemical 17 of 34 results Apr 9, 2002 Apr 14, 2025
Chromium 1020 Inorganic Chemical 12 of 34 results Jan 28, 2004 Apr 14, 2025
Chloroform 2941 Organic Chemical 11 of 29 results May 18, 2006 Aug 26, 2024
Gross Alpha, Incl. Radon & U 4002 Radionuclide 10 of 10 results Mar 8, 2012 Oct 8, 2012
Carbon Tetrachloride 2982 Organic Chemical 9 of 59 results Apr 14, 2004 Apr 14, 2010
Selenium 1045 Inorganic Chemical 8 of 34 results Jan 28, 2004 Apr 23, 2008
Arsenic 1005 Inorganic Chemical 6 of 34 results Jan 23, 2006 Jan 10, 2024
Cadmium 1015 Inorganic Chemical 6 of 34 results Jan 28, 2004 Jan 23, 2006
Bromodichloromethane 2943 Organic Chemical 5 of 29 results May 18, 2006 Dec 7, 2009
Dibromochloromethane 2944 Organic Chemical 5 of 29 results May 18, 2006 Dec 7, 2009
Sulfate 1055 Inorganic Chemical 5 of 8 results Apr 9, 2002 Jan 28, 2004
Sodium 1052 Inorganic Chemical 4 of 4 results Oct 30, 2019 Oct 20, 2024
Gross Alpha Particle Activity 4109 Radionuclide 4 of 4 results Jun 18, 2012 Jan 17, 2013
Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 Organic Chemical 3 of 20 results Dec 7, 2009 Jul 25, 2017
Combined Uranium 4006 Radionuclide 3 of 13 results Mar 8, 2012 Jul 30, 2012
Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 Organic Chemical 3 of 20 results Jun 25, 2008 Sep 8, 2009
Xylenes, Total 2955 Organic Chemical 2 of 59 results Aug 16, 2012 Dec 13, 2012
Ethylbenzene 2992 Organic Chemical 2 of 59 results Aug 16, 2012 Dec 13, 2012
Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 Organic Chemical 2 of 20 results Jun 25, 2008 Dec 7, 2009
Toluene 2991 Organic Chemical 1 of 59 results Dec 13, 2012 Dec 13, 2012
Styrene 2996 Organic Chemical 1 of 59 results Dec 13, 2012 Dec 13, 2012
Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 Organic Chemical 1 of 20 results Dec 7, 2009 Dec 7, 2009
Uranium-238 4009 Radionuclide 1 of 4 results Jan 23, 2006 Jan 23, 2006
Cyanide 1024 Inorganic Chemical 1 of 30 results Sep 8, 2003 Sep 8, 2003

No date range is applied: this list draws on every sample on record. Show the last two years only.

The most recent samples, result by result

The table below lists 221–230 of 506 samples, newest first — collected June 3, 2009 to September 8, 2009. The summary above covers all 506.

86 results from the 10 samples listed here: 14 detected, 72 not detected. Across the whole record it is 648 of 2,640. A sample is analysed for many analytes at once, so one sample appears on as many rows as it had results.

Units in this table

TTHM is recorded on this page in ug/l and mg/l. 1 mg/l = 1,000 ug/l.

We withheld the location of 2 sampling points below. The location on record identifies a private home, and we do not publish those. That is our decision, not the agency’s. The sampling point, its type and every result taken there are published unchanged.

Chemical and radiological sample results for Northeast Copiah Water Assn, every result from 221 to 230 of 506 samples shown, newest first. Not detected means the amount was below the level the laboratory can reliably report, which is given beside it.
Result Analyte Monitoring period
Collected
Sep 8, 2009
Sampling point
SM2 Location withheld
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
090909-018TH
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
1.01 ug/l , sample collected Sep 8, 2009, sampling point SM2 Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 8, 2009, sampling point SM2 Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 8, 2009, sampling point SM2 Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 8, 2009, sampling point SM2 Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
1.01 ug/l , sample collected Sep 8, 2009, sampling point SM2 TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
Collected
Sep 8, 2009
Sampling point
SM1 Location withheld
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
090909-017TH
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
1.58 ug/l , sample collected Sep 8, 2009, sampling point SM1 Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 8, 2009, sampling point SM1 Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 8, 2009, sampling point SM1 Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 8, 2009, sampling point SM1 Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
1.58 ug/l , sample collected Sep 8, 2009, sampling point SM1 TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
Collected
Sep 8, 2009
Sampling point
SM2 Location withheld
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
090909-046HA
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 8, 2009, sampling point SM2 Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 8, 2009, sampling point SM2 Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 8, 2009, sampling point SM2 Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
0.003 mg/l , sample collected Sep 8, 2009, sampling point SM2 Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 8, 2009, sampling point SM2 Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
0 mg/l This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. , sample collected Sep 8, 2009, sampling point SM2 Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 Not recorded
Collected
Sep 8, 2009
Sampling point
SM1 Location withheld
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
090909-045HA
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 8, 2009, sampling point SM1 Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 8, 2009, sampling point SM1 Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 8, 2009, sampling point SM1 Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
0.003 mg/l , sample collected Sep 8, 2009, sampling point SM1 Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 8, 2009, sampling point SM1 Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
0 mg/l This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. , sample collected Sep 8, 2009, sampling point SM1 Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 Not recorded
Collected
Jul 16, 2009
Sampling point
TF102 Treatment Plant T102
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
090717-012VO
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Jul 16, 2009, sampling point TF102 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 2378 EPA method 524.2 Jul 1, 2009 – Sep 30, 2009
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Jul 16, 2009, sampling point TF102 Cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene 2380 EPA method 524.2 Jul 1, 2009 – Sep 30, 2009
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Jul 16, 2009, sampling point TF102 Xylenes, Total 2955 EPA method 524.2 Jul 1, 2009 – Sep 30, 2009
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Jul 16, 2009, sampling point TF102 Dichloromethane 2964 EPA method 524.2 Jul 1, 2009 – Sep 30, 2009
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Jul 16, 2009, sampling point TF102 O-Dichlorobenzene 2968 EPA method 524.2 Jul 1, 2009 – Sep 30, 2009
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Jul 16, 2009, sampling point TF102 P-Dichlorobenzene 2969 EPA method 524.2 Jul 1, 2009 – Sep 30, 2009
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Jul 16, 2009, sampling point TF102 Vinyl Chloride 2976 EPA method 524.2 Jul 1, 2009 – Sep 30, 2009
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Jul 16, 2009, sampling point TF102 1,1-Dichloroethylene 2977 EPA method 524.2 Jul 1, 2009 – Sep 30, 2009
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Jul 16, 2009, sampling point TF102 Trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene 2979 EPA method 524.2 Jul 1, 2009 – Sep 30, 2009
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Jul 16, 2009, sampling point TF102 1,2-Dichloroethane 2980 EPA method 524.2 Jul 1, 2009 – Sep 30, 2009
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Jul 16, 2009, sampling point TF102 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 2981 EPA method 524.2 Jul 1, 2009 – Sep 30, 2009
0.766 ug/l , sample collected Jul 16, 2009, sampling point TF102 Carbon Tetrachloride 2982 EPA method 524.2 Jul 1, 2009 – Sep 30, 2009
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Jul 16, 2009, sampling point TF102 1,2-Dichloropropane 2983 EPA method 524.2 Jul 1, 2009 – Sep 30, 2009
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Jul 16, 2009, sampling point TF102 Trichloroethylene 2984 EPA method 524.2 Jul 1, 2009 – Sep 30, 2009
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Jul 16, 2009, sampling point TF102 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 2985 EPA method 524.2 Jul 1, 2009 – Sep 30, 2009
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Jul 16, 2009, sampling point TF102 Tetrachloroethylene 2987 EPA method 524.2 Jul 1, 2009 – Sep 30, 2009
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Jul 16, 2009, sampling point TF102 Chlorobenzene 2989 EPA method 524.2 Jul 1, 2009 – Sep 30, 2009
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Jul 16, 2009, sampling point TF102 Benzene 2990 EPA method 524.2 Jul 1, 2009 – Sep 30, 2009
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Jul 16, 2009, sampling point TF102 Toluene 2991 EPA method 524.2 Jul 1, 2009 – Sep 30, 2009
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Jul 16, 2009, sampling point TF102 Ethylbenzene 2992 EPA method 524.2 Jul 1, 2009 – Sep 30, 2009
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Jul 16, 2009, sampling point TF102 Styrene 2996 EPA method 524.2 Jul 1, 2009 – Sep 30, 2009
Collected
Jun 9, 2009
Sampling point
SM2 Location withheld
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
090610-032TH
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 9, 2009, sampling point SM2 Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 9, 2009, sampling point SM2 Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 9, 2009, sampling point SM2 Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 9, 2009, sampling point SM2 Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Jun 9, 2009, sampling point SM2 TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
Collected
Jun 9, 2009
Sampling point
SM1 Location withheld
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
090610-031TH
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 9, 2009, sampling point SM1 Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 9, 2009, sampling point SM1 Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 9, 2009, sampling point SM1 Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 9, 2009, sampling point SM1 Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Jun 9, 2009, sampling point SM1 TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
Collected
Jun 9, 2009
Sampling point
SM2 Location withheld
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
090610-012HA
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 9, 2009, sampling point SM2 Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 9, 2009, sampling point SM2 Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 9, 2009, sampling point SM2 Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 9, 2009, sampling point SM2 Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 9, 2009, sampling point SM2 Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Jun 9, 2009, sampling point SM2 Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 Not recorded
Collected
Jun 9, 2009
Sampling point
SM1 Location withheld
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
090610-011HA
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 9, 2009, sampling point SM1 Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 9, 2009, sampling point SM1 Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 9, 2009, sampling point SM1 Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 9, 2009, sampling point SM1 Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 9, 2009, sampling point SM1 Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Jun 9, 2009, sampling point SM1 Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 Not recorded
Collected
Jun 3, 2009
Sampling point
TF101 Treatment Plant T101
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
090604-004VO
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Jun 3, 2009, sampling point TF101 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 2378 EPA method 524.2 Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Jun 3, 2009, sampling point TF101 Cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene 2380 EPA method 524.2 Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Jun 3, 2009, sampling point TF101 Xylenes, Total 2955 EPA method 524.2 Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Jun 3, 2009, sampling point TF101 Dichloromethane 2964 EPA method 524.2 Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Jun 3, 2009, sampling point TF101 O-Dichlorobenzene 2968 EPA method 524.2 Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Jun 3, 2009, sampling point TF101 P-Dichlorobenzene 2969 EPA method 524.2 Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Jun 3, 2009, sampling point TF101 Vinyl Chloride 2976 EPA method 524.2 Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Jun 3, 2009, sampling point TF101 1,1-Dichloroethylene 2977 EPA method 524.2 Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Jun 3, 2009, sampling point TF101 Trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene 2979 EPA method 524.2 Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Jun 3, 2009, sampling point TF101 1,2-Dichloroethane 2980 EPA method 524.2 Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Jun 3, 2009, sampling point TF101 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 2981 EPA method 524.2 Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009
0.65 ug/l , sample collected Jun 3, 2009, sampling point TF101 Carbon Tetrachloride 2982 EPA method 524.2 Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Jun 3, 2009, sampling point TF101 1,2-Dichloropropane 2983 EPA method 524.2 Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Jun 3, 2009, sampling point TF101 Trichloroethylene 2984 EPA method 524.2 Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Jun 3, 2009, sampling point TF101 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 2985 EPA method 524.2 Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Jun 3, 2009, sampling point TF101 Tetrachloroethylene 2987 EPA method 524.2 Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Jun 3, 2009, sampling point TF101 Chlorobenzene 2989 EPA method 524.2 Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Jun 3, 2009, sampling point TF101 Benzene 2990 EPA method 524.2 Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Jun 3, 2009, sampling point TF101 Toluene 2991 EPA method 524.2 Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Jun 3, 2009, sampling point TF101 Ethylbenzene 2992 EPA method 524.2 Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Jun 3, 2009, sampling point TF101 Styrene 2996 EPA method 524.2 Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009

Routine (10).