This is a rebuild of Drinking Water Watch and not yet the official record. Use the agency’s current Drinking Water Watch for anything you need to rely on.
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) results
MS0170018 , City of Southaven
57 samples have been analysed for Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) at City of Southaven.
This is one analyte out of the system’s whole record. For what has ever been detected here, and when, see all chemical and radiological results; for everything the system is tested for, see the analyte list.
What counts as a non-detect is defined in the help: Less than Indicator. This system’s violations.
No date range is applied: this list draws on every sample on record. Show the last two years only.
Every Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) result
The table below lists 31–40 of 57 samples, newest first — collected August 17, 2010 to March 5, 2014.
10 Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) results from the 10 samples listed here: 2 detected, 8 not detected. Those samples also carried 50 results for other analytes, which are on the full results page.
We withheld the location of 3 sampling points below. The location on record identifies a private home, and we do not publish those. That is our decision, not the agency’s. The sampling point, its type and every result taken there are published unchanged.
| Result | Analyte | Monitoring period |
|---|---|---|
|
||
| Not detected below 0.006 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Mar 5, 2014 12:44, sampling point SM2 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Jan 1, 2014 – Mar 31, 2014 |
|
||
| 0.01 mg/l , sample collected Mar 5, 2014 01:15, sampling point SM3 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Jan 1, 2014 – Mar 31, 2014 |
|
||
| Not detected below 0.006 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Mar 5, 2014 02:11, sampling point SM1 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Jan 1, 2014 – Mar 31, 2014 |
|
||
| Not detected below 0.006 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Dec 2, 2013 02:35, sampling point SM3 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Oct 1, 2013 – Dec 31, 2013 |
|
||
| Not detected below 0.006 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Dec 2, 2013 02:10, sampling point SM2 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Oct 1, 2013 – Dec 31, 2013 |
|
||
| Not detected below 0.006 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Dec 2, 2013 01:45, sampling point SM4 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Oct 1, 2013 – Dec 31, 2013 |
|
||
| Not detected below 0.006 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Dec 2, 2013 01:30, sampling point SM1 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Oct 1, 2013 – Dec 31, 2013 |
|
||
| Not detected below 0.006 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 6, 2012 02:57, sampling point MRT000 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Jan 1, 2012 – Dec 31, 2012 |
|
||
| Not detected below 0.006 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 20, 2011 01:40, sampling point MRT000 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2011 |
|
||
| 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Aug 17, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010 |
-
- Collected
- Mar 5, 2014 12:44
- Sampling point
- SM2 Location withheld
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 140306-025HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2014 – Mar 31, 2014
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- Not detected below 0.006 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Mar 5, 2014 01:15
- Sampling point
- SM3 Location withheld
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 140306-020HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2014 – Mar 31, 2014
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- 0.01 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Mar 5, 2014 02:11
- Sampling point
- SM1 Shiloh Baptist Church
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 140306-019HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2014 – Mar 31, 2014
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- Not detected below 0.006 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Dec 2, 2013 02:35
- Sampling point
- SM3 Location withheld
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 131203-018HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Oct 1, 2013 – Dec 31, 2013
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- Not detected below 0.006 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Dec 2, 2013 02:10
- Sampling point
- SM2 Location withheld
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 131203-017HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Oct 1, 2013 – Dec 31, 2013
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- Not detected below 0.006 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Dec 2, 2013 01:45
- Sampling point
- SM4 Location withheld
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 131203-014HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Oct 1, 2013 – Dec 31, 2013
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- Not detected below 0.006 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Dec 2, 2013 01:30
- Sampling point
- SM1 Shiloh Baptist Church
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 131203-013HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Oct 1, 2013 – Dec 31, 2013
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- Not detected below 0.006 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Jun 6, 2012 02:57
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 120607-006HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2012 – Dec 31, 2012
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- Not detected below 0.006 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Jul 20, 2011 01:40
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 110721-013HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2011
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- Not detected below 0.006 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Aug 17, 2010
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100818-005HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
Routine (10).