This is a rebuild of Drinking Water Watch and not yet the official record. Use the agency’s current Drinking Water Watch for anything you need to rely on.
Chemical and radiological sample results
MS0170025 , City of Horn Lake - Twin Lakes
22 of the 55 analytes this system has been tested for have been detected at least once, across 221 samples on record.
The other 33 were tested for and never found. An analyte is counted here if any result on record measured it, so this covers the whole history and not the samples listed below.
Across all 221 samples on record, detections range from August 11, 1993 to September 29, 2025. These figures cover the whole record.
What counts as a non-detect is defined in the help: Less than Indicator. This system’s violations.
What has been detected, ever
Every analyte measured above its reporting level at any point in this system’s record, most often detected first. This is not limited to the samples listed below.
| Analyte | Kind | Detected in | First detected | Last detected |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper, Free 1022 | Inorganic Chemical | 135 of 141 results | Aug 11, 1993 | Sep 12, 2025 |
| Lead 1030 | Inorganic Chemical | 81 of 141 results | Aug 11, 1993 | Aug 26, 2025 |
| TTHM 2950 | Organic Chemical | 19 of 20 results | Jul 10, 2007 | Sep 29, 2025 |
| Bromodichloromethane 2943 | Organic Chemical | 14 of 15 results | Jul 10, 2007 | Sep 29, 2025 |
| Dibromochloromethane 2944 | Organic Chemical | 14 of 15 results | Jul 10, 2007 | Sep 29, 2025 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Organic Chemical | 12 of 22 results | Jul 10, 2007 | Sep 29, 2025 |
| Chloroform 2941 | Organic Chemical | 12 of 15 results | Jul 10, 2007 | Sep 29, 2025 |
| Bromoform 2942 | Organic Chemical | 12 of 15 results | Jul 10, 2007 | Sep 29, 2025 |
| Barium 1010 | Inorganic Chemical | 11 of 11 results | Oct 8, 2019 | Feb 7, 2024 |
| Nickel 1036 | Inorganic Chemical | 11 of 11 results | Oct 8, 2019 | Feb 7, 2024 |
| Fluoride 1025 | Inorganic Chemical | 9 of 11 results | Dec 3, 2019 | Feb 7, 2024 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 | Organic Chemical | 7 of 16 results | Jul 18, 2019 | Sep 29, 2025 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 | Organic Chemical | 6 of 16 results | Jul 18, 2019 | Sep 29, 2025 |
| Chromium 1020 | Inorganic Chemical | 6 of 11 results | Dec 3, 2019 | Feb 7, 2024 |
| Combined Radium (-226 & -228) 4010 | Radionuclide | 2 of 2 results | Jan 27, 2020 | Jun 16, 2020 |
| Radium-228 4030 | Radionuclide | 2 of 2 results | Jan 27, 2020 | Jun 16, 2020 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 | Organic Chemical | 1 of 16 results | Jan 27, 2025 | Jan 27, 2025 |
| Nitrite 1041 | Inorganic Chemical | 1 of 9 results | Jan 10, 2022 | Jan 10, 2022 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 | Organic Chemical | 1 of 16 results | Aug 24, 2020 | Aug 24, 2020 |
| Radium-226 4020 | Radionuclide | 1 of 2 results | Jun 16, 2020 | Jun 16, 2020 |
| Gross Alpha, Incl. Radon & U 4002 | Radionuclide | 1 of 1 result | Jan 27, 2020 | Jan 27, 2020 |
| Sodium 1052 | Inorganic Chemical | 1 of 1 result | Sep 17, 2019 | Sep 17, 2019 |
No date range is applied: this list draws on every sample on record. Show the last two years only.
The most recent samples, result by result
The table below lists 131–140 of 221 samples, newest first — collected August 14, 2007 to August 2, 2011. The summary above covers all 221.
27 results from the 10 samples listed here: 16 detected, 11 not detected. Across the whole record it is 359 of 823. A sample is analysed for many analytes at once, so one sample appears on as many rows as it had results.
| Result | Analyte | Monitoring period |
|---|---|---|
|
||
| 0.054 mg/l , sample collected Aug 2, 2011, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 2, 2011, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Not recorded |
|
||
| 0.0347 mg/l , sample collected Aug 2, 2011, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 2, 2011, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Not recorded |
|
||
| 0.1918 mg/l , sample collected Aug 2, 2011, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Not recorded |
| 0.0013 mg/l , sample collected Aug 2, 2011, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Not recorded |
|
||
| 0.1766 mg/l , sample collected Aug 1, 2011, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Not recorded |
| 0.0007 mg/l , sample collected Aug 1, 2011, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Not recorded |
|
||
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 16, 2008, sampling point MRT000 | Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 16, 2008, sampling point MRT000 | Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 16, 2008, sampling point MRT000 | Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 16, 2008, sampling point MRT000 | Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Sep 16, 2008, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 16, 2008, sampling point MRT000 | Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 16, 2008, sampling point MRT000 | Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 16, 2008, sampling point MRT000 | Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 16, 2008, sampling point MRT000 | Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 16, 2008, sampling point MRT000 | Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Sep 16, 2008, sampling point MRT000 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| 0.0671 mg/l , sample collected Aug 14, 2007, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
| 0.0029 mg/l , sample collected Aug 14, 2007, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
|
||
| 0.1913 mg/l , sample collected Aug 14, 2007, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
| 0.0016 mg/l , sample collected Aug 14, 2007, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
|
||
| 0.0596 mg/l , sample collected Aug 14, 2007, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
| 0.0016 mg/l , sample collected Aug 14, 2007, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
|
||
| 0.0389 mg/l , sample collected Aug 14, 2007, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
| 0.0007 mg/l , sample collected Aug 14, 2007, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
-
- Collected
- Aug 2, 2011
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 110803-013PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.054 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Aug 2, 2011
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 110803-012PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0347 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Aug 2, 2011
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 110803-011PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.1918 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0013 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Aug 1, 2011
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 110803-026PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.1766 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0007 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Sep 16, 2008
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 080917-006TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
-
Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
- Collected
- Sep 16, 2008
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 080917-015HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
-
Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
- Collected
- Aug 14, 2007
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 070815-321PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0671 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0029 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Aug 14, 2007
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 070815-556PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.1913 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0016 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Aug 14, 2007
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 070815-325PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0596 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0016 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Aug 14, 2007
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 070815-324PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0389 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0007 mg/l
Routine (10).