Chemical and radiological sample results

MS0190001 , Town of Bude

32 of the 71 analytes this system has been tested for have been detected at least once, across 241 samples on record.

The other 39 were tested for and never found. An analyte is counted here if any result on record measured it, so this covers the whole history and not the samples listed below.

Across all 241 samples on record, detections range from December 1, 1993 to July 8, 2026. These figures cover the whole record.

What counts as a non-detect is defined in the help: Less than Indicator. This system’s violations.

What has been detected, ever

Every analyte measured above its reporting level at any point in this system’s record, most often detected first. This is not limited to the samples listed below.

Every analyte ever detected for Town of Bude, with how many results found it and when it was first and last detected. Covers the whole record, not only the samples listed below.
Analyte	Kind	Detected in	First detected	Last detected
Copper, Free 1022	Inorganic Chemical	86 of 145 results	Dec 1, 1993	Jun 24, 2025
Lead 1030	Inorganic Chemical	60 of 145 results	Dec 1, 1993	Jun 24, 2025
Nitrate-Nitrite 1038	Inorganic Chemical	23 of 23 results	Jun 21, 2004	Jul 8, 2026
Nitrate 1040	Inorganic Chemical	23 of 23 results	Jun 21, 2004	Jul 8, 2026
TTHM 2950	Organic Chemical	15 of 21 results	Jul 30, 2007	Aug 13, 2025
Dibromochloromethane 2944	Organic Chemical	11 of 16 results	Sep 3, 2014	Aug 13, 2025
Barium 1010	Inorganic Chemical	11 of 11 results	May 21, 2002	Feb 4, 2025
Bromodichloromethane 2943	Organic Chemical	10 of 16 results	Jul 25, 2018	Aug 13, 2025
Chloroform 2941	Organic Chemical	9 of 16 results	Jul 25, 2018	Aug 13, 2025
Nickel 1036	Inorganic Chemical	9 of 11 results	Feb 2, 2004	Feb 4, 2025
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456	Organic Chemical	7 of 21 results	Jul 30, 2007	Mar 19, 2024
Gross Alpha, Incl. Radon & U 4002	Radionuclide	5 of 5 results	Dec 14, 2011	Jul 13, 2012
Sodium 1052	Inorganic Chemical	4 of 4 results	Mar 21, 2017	Jan 29, 2024
Bromoform 2942	Organic Chemical	3 of 16 results	Jul 25, 2018	Aug 5, 2024
Arsenic 1005	Inorganic Chemical	2 of 11 results	Apr 2, 2008	Feb 4, 2025
Monochloroacetic Acid 2450	Organic Chemical	2 of 15 results	Jul 18, 2019	Aug 25, 2020
Dichloroacetic Acid 2451	Organic Chemical	2 of 15 results	Jul 25, 2018	Jul 18, 2019
Calcium 1016	Inorganic Chemical	1 of 1 result	Mar 21, 2017	Mar 21, 2017
Chloride 1017	Inorganic Chemical	1 of 1 result	Mar 21, 2017	Mar 21, 2017
Iron 1028	Inorganic Chemical	1 of 1 result	Mar 21, 2017	Mar 21, 2017
Magnesium 1031	Inorganic Chemical	1 of 1 result	Mar 21, 2017	Mar 21, 2017
Manganese 1032	Inorganic Chemical	1 of 1 result	Mar 21, 2017	Mar 21, 2017
Potassium 1042	Inorganic Chemical	1 of 1 result	Mar 21, 2017	Mar 21, 2017
Residue, Total, Filterable 1057	Water Quality	1 of 1 result	Mar 21, 2017	Mar 21, 2017
Carbon Dioxide 1901	Water Quality	1 of 1 result	Mar 21, 2017	Mar 21, 2017
Color 1905	Water Quality	1 of 1 result	Mar 21, 2017	Mar 21, 2017
Hardness, Total (As Caco3) 1915	Water Quality	1 of 1 result	Mar 21, 2017	Mar 21, 2017
Alkalinity, Total 1927	Water Quality	1 of 1 result	Mar 21, 2017	Mar 21, 2017
Iron, Field Result FEFD	Inorganic Chemical	1 of 1 result	Mar 21, 2017	Mar 21, 2017
Calculated Sodium NACA	Water Quality	1 of 1 result	Mar 21, 2017	Mar 21, 2017
PH, Field Result PHFD	Water Quality	1 of 1 result	Mar 21, 2017	Mar 21, 2017
Chromium 1020	Inorganic Chemical	1 of 11 results	Apr 16, 2014	Apr 16, 2014

No date range is applied: this list draws on every sample on record. Show the last two years only.

The most recent samples, result by result

The table below lists 131–140 of 241 samples, newest first — collected July 30, 2007 to June 2, 2010. The summary above covers all 241.

59 results from the 10 samples listed here: 13 detected, 46 not detected. Across the whole record it is 297 of 885. A sample is analysed for many analytes at once, so one sample appears on as many rows as it had results.

Chemical and radiological sample results for Town of Bude, every result from 131 to 140 of 241 samples shown, newest first. Not detected means the amount was below the level the laboratory can reliably report, which is given beside it.
Result	Analyte	Monitoring period
Collected Jun 2, 2010 Sampling point TF080 Treatment Plant T080 Sample type Routine Lab sample 100603-016NI Laboratory MSDH Lab
0.34 mg/l , sample collected Jun 2, 2010, sampling point TF080	Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2	Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010
0.34 mg/l , sample collected Jun 2, 2010, sampling point TF080	Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2	Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.05 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 2, 2010, sampling point TF080	Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2	Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010
Collected Apr 8, 2009 Sampling point TF080 Treatment Plant T080 Sample type Routine Lab sample 090409-085NI Laboratory MSDH Lab
0.31 mg/l , sample collected Apr 8, 2009, sampling point TF080	Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2	Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009
0.31 mg/l , sample collected Apr 8, 2009, sampling point TF080	Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2	Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009
Not detected below 0.05 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Apr 8, 2009, sampling point TF080	Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2	Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009
Collected Sep 17, 2008 Sampling point MRT000 Max. Res. Time Sample type Routine Lab sample 080918-019TH Laboratory MSDH Lab
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 17, 2008, sampling point MRT000	Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2	Not recorded
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 17, 2008, sampling point MRT000	Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2	Not recorded
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 17, 2008, sampling point MRT000	Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2	Not recorded
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 17, 2008, sampling point MRT000	Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2	Not recorded
0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Sep 17, 2008, sampling point MRT000	TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2	Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Collected Sep 17, 2008 Sampling point MRT000 Max. Res. Time Sample type Routine Lab sample 080918-019HA Laboratory MSDH Lab
Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 17, 2008, sampling point MRT000	Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2	Not recorded
Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 17, 2008, sampling point MRT000	Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2	Not recorded
Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 17, 2008, sampling point MRT000	Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2	Not recorded
Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 17, 2008, sampling point MRT000	Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2	Not recorded
Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 17, 2008, sampling point MRT000	Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2	Not recorded
0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Sep 17, 2008, sampling point MRT000	Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456	Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Collected May 19, 2008 Sampling point TF080 Treatment Plant T080 Sample type Routine Lab sample 080520-054NI Laboratory MSDH Lab
0.31 mg/l , sample collected May 19, 2008, sampling point TF080	Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2	Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008
0.31 mg/l , sample collected May 19, 2008, sampling point TF080	Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2	Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008
Not detected below 0.02 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected May 19, 2008, sampling point TF080	Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2	Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008
Collected Apr 23, 2008 Sampling point TF080 Treatment Plant T080 Sample type Routine Lab sample 080424-010VO Laboratory MSDH Lab
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Apr 23, 2008, sampling point TF080	1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 2378 EPA method 524.2	Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Apr 23, 2008, sampling point TF080	Cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene 2380 EPA method 524.2	Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Apr 23, 2008, sampling point TF080	Xylenes, Total 2955 EPA method 524.2	Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Apr 23, 2008, sampling point TF080	Dichloromethane 2964 EPA method 524.2	Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Apr 23, 2008, sampling point TF080	O-Dichlorobenzene 2968 EPA method 524.2	Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Apr 23, 2008, sampling point TF080	P-Dichlorobenzene 2969 EPA method 524.2	Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Apr 23, 2008, sampling point TF080	Vinyl Chloride 2976 EPA method 524.2	Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Apr 23, 2008, sampling point TF080	1,1-Dichloroethylene 2977 EPA method 524.2	Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Apr 23, 2008, sampling point TF080	Trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene 2979 EPA method 524.2	Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Apr 23, 2008, sampling point TF080	1,2-Dichloroethane 2980 EPA method 524.2	Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Apr 23, 2008, sampling point TF080	1,1,1-Trichloroethane 2981 EPA method 524.2	Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Apr 23, 2008, sampling point TF080	Carbon Tetrachloride 2982 EPA method 524.2	Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Apr 23, 2008, sampling point TF080	1,2-Dichloropropane 2983 EPA method 524.2	Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Apr 23, 2008, sampling point TF080	Trichloroethylene 2984 EPA method 524.2	Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Apr 23, 2008, sampling point TF080	1,1,2-Trichloroethane 2985 EPA method 524.2	Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Apr 23, 2008, sampling point TF080	Tetrachloroethylene 2987 EPA method 524.2	Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Apr 23, 2008, sampling point TF080	Chlorobenzene 2989 EPA method 524.2	Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Apr 23, 2008, sampling point TF080	Benzene 2990 EPA method 524.2	Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Apr 23, 2008, sampling point TF080	Toluene 2991 EPA method 524.2	Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Apr 23, 2008, sampling point TF080	Ethylbenzene 2992 EPA method 524.2	Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Apr 23, 2008, sampling point TF080	Styrene 2996 EPA method 524.2	Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2010
Collected Apr 2, 2008 Sampling point TF080 Treatment Plant T080 Sample type Routine Lab sample 080403-057CN Laboratory MSDH Lab
Not detected below 0.005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Apr 2, 2008, sampling point TF080	Cyanide 1024 EPA method QC10204001X	Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Collected Apr 2, 2008 Sampling point TF080 Treatment Plant T080 Sample type Routine Lab sample 080403-050IN Laboratory MSDH Lab
0.000201 mg/l , sample collected Apr 2, 2008, sampling point TF080	Arsenic 1005 EPA method 200.8	Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
0.02037 mg/l , sample collected Apr 2, 2008, sampling point TF080	Barium 1010 EPA method 200.8	Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Apr 2, 2008, sampling point TF080	Cadmium 1015 EPA method 200.8	Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Apr 2, 2008, sampling point TF080	Chromium 1020 EPA method 200.8	Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.1 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Apr 2, 2008, sampling point TF080	Fluoride 1025 EPA method 380-75WE	Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Apr 2, 2008, sampling point TF080	Mercury 1035 EPA method 200.8	Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
0.001412 mg/l , sample collected Apr 2, 2008, sampling point TF080	Nickel 1036 EPA method 200.8	Not recorded
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Apr 2, 2008, sampling point TF080	Selenium 1045 EPA method 200.8	Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Apr 2, 2008, sampling point TF080	Antimony, Total 1074 EPA method 200.8	Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Apr 2, 2008, sampling point TF080	Beryllium, Total 1075 EPA method 200.8	Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Apr 2, 2008, sampling point TF080	Thallium, Total 1085 EPA method 200.8	Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Collected Jul 30, 2007 Sampling point MRT000 Max. Res. Time Sample type Routine Lab sample 070731-019HA Laboratory MSDH Lab
0.0006 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Jul 30, 2007, sampling point MRT000	Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 EPA method 552.2	Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007
Collected Jul 30, 2007 Sampling point MRT000 Max. Res. Time Sample type Routine Lab sample 070731-019TH Laboratory MSDH Lab
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 30, 2007, sampling point MRT000	Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2	Not recorded
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 30, 2007, sampling point MRT000	Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2	Not recorded
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 30, 2007, sampling point MRT000	Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2	Not recorded
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 30, 2007, sampling point MRT000	Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2	Not recorded
0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Jul 30, 2007, sampling point MRT000	TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2	Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007

Collected
Jun 2, 2010

Sampling point
TF080 Treatment Plant T080

Sample type
Routine

Lab sample
100603-016NI

Laboratory
MSDH Lab

Monitoring period
Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010
- Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2
  
  Result
  0.34 mg/l
- Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2
  
  Result
  0.34 mg/l
- Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2
  
  Result
  Not detected below 0.05 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
Collected
Apr 8, 2009

Sampling point
TF080 Treatment Plant T080

Sample type
Routine

Lab sample
090409-085NI

Laboratory
MSDH Lab

Monitoring period
Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009
- Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2
  
  Result
  0.31 mg/l
- Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2
  
  Result
  0.31 mg/l
- Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2
  
  Result
  Not detected below 0.05 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
Collected
Sep 17, 2008

Sampling point
MRT000 Max. Res. Time

Sample type
Routine

Lab sample
080918-019TH

Laboratory
MSDH Lab
- Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2
  
  Result
  Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
  
  Monitoring period
  Not recorded
- Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2
  
  Result
  Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
  
  Monitoring period
  Not recorded
- Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2
  
  Result
  Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
  
  Monitoring period
  Not recorded
- Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2
  
  Result
  Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
  
  Monitoring period
  Not recorded
- TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
  
  Result
  0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
  
  Monitoring period
  Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Collected
Sep 17, 2008

Sampling point
MRT000 Max. Res. Time

Sample type
Routine

Lab sample
080918-019HA

Laboratory
MSDH Lab
- Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2
  
  Result
  Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
  
  Monitoring period
  Not recorded
- Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2
  
  Result
  Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
  
  Monitoring period
  Not recorded
- Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2
  
  Result
  Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
  
  Monitoring period
  Not recorded
- Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2
  
  Result
  Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
  
  Monitoring period
  Not recorded
- Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2
  
  Result
  Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
  
  Monitoring period
  Not recorded
- Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
  
  Result
  0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
  
  Monitoring period
  Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Collected
May 19, 2008

Sampling point
TF080 Treatment Plant T080

Sample type
Routine

Lab sample
080520-054NI

Laboratory
MSDH Lab

Monitoring period
Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008
- Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2
  
  Result
  0.31 mg/l
- Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2
  
  Result
  0.31 mg/l
- Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2
  
  Result
  Not detected below 0.02 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
Collected
Apr 23, 2008

Sampling point
TF080 Treatment Plant T080

Sample type
Routine

Lab sample
080424-010VO

Laboratory
MSDH Lab

Monitoring period
Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2010
- 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 2378 EPA method 524.2
  
  Result
  Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit
- Cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene 2380 EPA method 524.2
  
  Result
  Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit
- Xylenes, Total 2955 EPA method 524.2
  
  Result
  Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit
- Dichloromethane 2964 EPA method 524.2
  
  Result
  Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit
- O-Dichlorobenzene 2968 EPA method 524.2
  
  Result
  Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit
- P-Dichlorobenzene 2969 EPA method 524.2
  
  Result
  Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit
- Vinyl Chloride 2976 EPA method 524.2
  
  Result
  Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit
- 1,1-Dichloroethylene 2977 EPA method 524.2
  
  Result
  Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit
- Trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene 2979 EPA method 524.2
  
  Result
  Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit
- 1,2-Dichloroethane 2980 EPA method 524.2
  
  Result
  Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit
- 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 2981 EPA method 524.2
  
  Result
  Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit
- Carbon Tetrachloride 2982 EPA method 524.2
  
  Result
  Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit
- 1,2-Dichloropropane 2983 EPA method 524.2
  
  Result
  Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit
- Trichloroethylene 2984 EPA method 524.2
  
  Result
  Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit
- 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 2985 EPA method 524.2
  
  Result
  Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit
- Tetrachloroethylene 2987 EPA method 524.2
  
  Result
  Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit
- Chlorobenzene 2989 EPA method 524.2
  
  Result
  Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit
- Benzene 2990 EPA method 524.2
  
  Result
  Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit
- Toluene 2991 EPA method 524.2
  
  Result
  Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit
- Ethylbenzene 2992 EPA method 524.2
  
  Result
  Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit
- Styrene 2996 EPA method 524.2
  
  Result
  Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit
Collected
Apr 2, 2008

Sampling point
TF080 Treatment Plant T080

Sample type
Routine

Lab sample
080403-057CN

Laboratory
MSDH Lab

Monitoring period
Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
- Cyanide 1024 EPA method QC10204001X
  
  Result
  Not detected below 0.005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
Collected
Apr 2, 2008

Sampling point
TF080 Treatment Plant T080

Sample type
Routine

Lab sample
080403-050IN

Laboratory
MSDH Lab
- Arsenic 1005 EPA method 200.8
  
  Result
  0.000201 mg/l
  
  Monitoring period
  Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
- Barium 1010 EPA method 200.8
  
  Result
  0.02037 mg/l
  
  Monitoring period
  Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
- Cadmium 1015 EPA method 200.8
  
  Result
  Not detected below 0.0001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
  
  Monitoring period
  Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
- Chromium 1020 EPA method 200.8
  
  Result
  Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
  
  Monitoring period
  Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
- Fluoride 1025 EPA method 380-75WE
  
  Result
  Not detected below 0.1 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
  
  Monitoring period
  Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
- Mercury 1035 EPA method 200.8
  
  Result
  Not detected below 0.0002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
  
  Monitoring period
  Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
- Nickel 1036 EPA method 200.8
  
  Result
  0.001412 mg/l
  
  Monitoring period
  Not recorded
- Selenium 1045 EPA method 200.8
  
  Result
  Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
  
  Monitoring period
  Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
- Antimony, Total 1074 EPA method 200.8
  
  Result
  Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
  
  Monitoring period
  Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
- Beryllium, Total 1075 EPA method 200.8
  
  Result
  Not detected below 0.0001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
  
  Monitoring period
  Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
- Thallium, Total 1085 EPA method 200.8
  
  Result
  Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
  
  Monitoring period
  Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Collected
Jul 30, 2007

Sampling point
MRT000 Max. Res. Time

Sample type
Routine

Lab sample
070731-019HA

Laboratory
MSDH Lab

Monitoring period
Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007
- Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 EPA method 552.2
  
  Result
  0.0006 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
Collected
Jul 30, 2007

Sampling point
MRT000 Max. Res. Time

Sample type
Routine

Lab sample
070731-019TH

Laboratory
MSDH Lab
- Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2
  
  Result
  Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
  
  Monitoring period
  Not recorded
- Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2
  
  Result
  Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
  
  Monitoring period
  Not recorded
- Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2
  
  Result
  Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
  
  Monitoring period
  Not recorded
- Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2
  
  Result
  Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
  
  Monitoring period
  Not recorded
- TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
  
  Result
  0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
  
  Monitoring period
  Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007

Routine (10).