This is a rebuild of Drinking Water Watch and not yet the official record. Use the agency’s current Drinking Water Watch for anything you need to rely on.
Chemical and radiological sample results
MS0250005 , Town of Edwards
32 of the 59 analytes this system has been tested for have been detected at least once, across 537 samples on record.
The other 27 were tested for and never found. An analyte is counted here if any result on record measured it, so this covers the whole history and not the samples listed below.
Across all 537 samples on record, detections range from July 26, 1993 to June 17, 2026. These figures cover the whole record.
What counts as a non-detect is defined in the help: Less than Indicator. This system’s violations.
What has been detected, ever
Every analyte measured above its reporting level at any point in this system’s record, most often detected first. This is not limited to the samples listed below.
| Analyte | Kind | Detected in | First detected | Last detected |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper, Free 1022 | Inorganic Chemical | 182 of 200 results | Jul 26, 1993 | Jun 30, 2023 |
| Lead 1030 | Inorganic Chemical | 138 of 200 results | Jul 26, 1993 | Jun 27, 2023 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Organic Chemical | 80 of 83 results | Jun 7, 2007 | Feb 19, 2026 |
| TTHM 2950 | Organic Chemical | 79 of 83 results | Jun 7, 2007 | Jun 17, 2026 |
| Chloroform 2941 | Organic Chemical | 42 of 45 results | Jun 7, 2007 | Jun 17, 2026 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 | Organic Chemical | 37 of 42 results | Oct 24, 2007 | Feb 19, 2026 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 | Organic Chemical | 37 of 42 results | Oct 24, 2007 | Feb 19, 2026 |
| Bromodichloromethane 2943 | Organic Chemical | 36 of 45 results | Jun 7, 2007 | Jun 17, 2026 |
| Barium 1010 | Inorganic Chemical | 23 of 23 results | Sep 22, 2003 | Feb 18, 2025 |
| Fluoride 1025 | Inorganic Chemical | 23 of 23 results | Sep 22, 2003 | Feb 18, 2025 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 | Organic Chemical | 19 of 42 results | Oct 24, 2007 | Apr 22, 2020 |
| Chromium 1020 | Inorganic Chemical | 11 of 23 results | Sep 22, 2003 | May 17, 2022 |
| Dibromochloromethane 2944 | Organic Chemical | 10 of 45 results | Oct 24, 2007 | Oct 19, 2020 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 | Organic Chemical | 7 of 42 results | Aug 10, 2010 | Oct 19, 2020 |
| Sodium 1052 | Inorganic Chemical | 6 of 6 results | Sep 25, 2019 | Feb 7, 2024 |
| Nickel 1036 | Inorganic Chemical | 6 of 23 results | Nov 15, 2004 | Oct 24, 2018 |
| Selenium 1045 | Inorganic Chemical | 5 of 23 results | Nov 15, 2004 | Apr 9, 2008 |
| Gross Alpha Particle Activity 4109 | Radionuclide | 4 of 4 results | May 17, 2012 | Jan 17, 2013 |
| Gross Alpha, Incl. Radon & U 4002 | Radionuclide | 3 of 4 results | Jan 18, 2018 | Jul 11, 2019 |
| Sulfate 1055 | Inorganic Chemical | 3 of 3 results | Sep 22, 2003 | Sep 22, 2003 |
| Carbon Tetrachloride 2982 | Organic Chemical | 2 of 47 results | Mar 23, 2023 | Mar 23, 2023 |
| Arsenic 1005 | Inorganic Chemical | 2 of 23 results | Oct 23, 2019 | Oct 23, 2019 |
| Combined Radium (-226 & -228) 4010 | Radionuclide | 2 of 6 results | Jan 18, 2018 | Mar 11, 2019 |
| Radium-228 4030 | Radionuclide | 2 of 6 results | Jan 18, 2018 | Mar 11, 2019 |
| P-Dichlorobenzene 2969 | Organic Chemical | 2 of 47 results | Apr 20, 2017 | Apr 20, 2017 |
| Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon & U 4000 | Radionuclide | 1 of 1 result | Mar 11, 2019 | Mar 11, 2019 |
| Radium-226 4020 | Radionuclide | 1 of 6 results | Jan 18, 2018 | Jan 18, 2018 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 | Organic Chemical | 1 of 42 results | Sep 28, 2016 | Sep 28, 2016 |
| Nitrite 1041 | Inorganic Chemical | 1 of 50 results | Feb 13, 2013 | Feb 13, 2013 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 | Inorganic Chemical | 1 of 50 results | Dec 9, 2009 | Dec 9, 2009 |
| Nitrate 1040 | Inorganic Chemical | 1 of 50 results | Dec 9, 2009 | Dec 9, 2009 |
| Xylenes, Total 2955 | Organic Chemical | 1 of 47 results | Jun 29, 2005 | Jun 29, 2005 |
No date range is applied: this list draws on every sample on record. Show the last two years only.
The most recent samples, result by result
The table below lists 311–320 of 537 samples, newest first — collected November 20, 2008 to April 15, 2009. The summary above covers all 537.
50 results from the 10 samples listed here: 19 detected, 31 not detected. Across the whole record it is 768 of 2,421. A sample is analysed for many analytes at once, so one sample appears on as many rows as it had results.
Units in this table
TTHM is recorded on this page in ug/l and mg/l. 1 mg/l = 1,000 ug/l.
| Result | Analyte | Monitoring period |
|---|---|---|
|
||
| Not detected below 0.25 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Apr 15, 2009, sampling point TF105 | Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009 |
| Not detected below 0.2 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Apr 15, 2009, sampling point TF105 | Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009 |
| Not detected below 0.05 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Apr 15, 2009, sampling point TF105 | Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009 |
|
||
| Not detected below 0.25 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Apr 15, 2009, sampling point TF104 | Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009 |
| Not detected below 0.2 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Apr 15, 2009, sampling point TF104 | Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009 |
| Not detected below 0.05 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Apr 15, 2009, sampling point TF104 | Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009 |
|
||
| 12.3 ug/l , sample collected Mar 9, 2009, sampling point SM2 | Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Mar 9, 2009, sampling point SM2 | Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Mar 9, 2009, sampling point SM2 | Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Mar 9, 2009, sampling point SM2 | Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| 12.3 ug/l , sample collected Mar 9, 2009, sampling point SM2 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
|
||
| 26.6 ug/l , sample collected Mar 9, 2009, sampling point SM1 | Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Mar 9, 2009, sampling point SM1 | Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| 1.24 ug/l , sample collected Mar 9, 2009, sampling point SM1 | Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Mar 9, 2009, sampling point SM1 | Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| 27.84 ug/l , sample collected Mar 9, 2009, sampling point SM1 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
|
||
| 0.002 mg/l , sample collected Mar 9, 2009, sampling point SM1 | Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| 0.015 mg/l , sample collected Mar 9, 2009, sampling point SM1 | Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| 0.01 mg/l , sample collected Mar 9, 2009, sampling point SM1 | Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Mar 9, 2009, sampling point SM1 | Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Mar 9, 2009, sampling point SM1 | Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| 0.02 mg/l , sample collected Mar 9, 2009, sampling point SM1 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Not recorded |
|
||
| Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Mar 9, 2009, sampling point SM2 | Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| 0.01 mg/l , sample collected Mar 9, 2009, sampling point SM2 | Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| 0.003 mg/l , sample collected Mar 9, 2009, sampling point SM2 | Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Mar 9, 2009, sampling point SM2 | Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Mar 9, 2009, sampling point SM2 | Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| 0.01 mg/l , sample collected Mar 9, 2009, sampling point SM2 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Not recorded |
|
||
| 11.3 ug/l , sample collected Feb 24, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 24, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 24, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 24, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| 11.3 ug/l , sample collected Feb 24, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Jan 1, 2009 – Mar 31, 2009 |
|
||
| Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 24, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| 0.01 mg/l , sample collected Feb 24, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| 0.004 mg/l , sample collected Feb 24, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 24, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 24, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| 0.01 mg/l , sample collected Feb 24, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Jan 1, 2009 – Mar 31, 2009 |
|
||
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Nov 20, 2008, sampling point MRT000 | Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Nov 20, 2008, sampling point MRT000 | Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Nov 20, 2008, sampling point MRT000 | Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Nov 20, 2008, sampling point MRT000 | Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Nov 20, 2008, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Oct 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008 |
|
||
| Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Nov 20, 2008, sampling point MRT000 | Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Nov 20, 2008, sampling point MRT000 | Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Nov 20, 2008, sampling point MRT000 | Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Nov 20, 2008, sampling point MRT000 | Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Nov 20, 2008, sampling point MRT000 | Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Nov 20, 2008, sampling point MRT000 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Oct 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008 |
-
- Collected
- Apr 15, 2009
- Sampling point
- TF105 Treatment Plant T105
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 090416-060NI
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009
-
Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.25 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.2 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.05 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Apr 15, 2009
- Sampling point
- TF104 Treatment Plant T104
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 090416-059NI
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009
-
Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.25 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.2 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.05 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Mar 9, 2009
- Sampling point
- SM2 SM2
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 090310-012TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 12.3 ug/l
-
Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 12.3 ug/l
-
- Collected
- Mar 9, 2009
- Sampling point
- SM1 SM1
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 090310-011TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 26.6 ug/l
-
Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 1.24 ug/l
-
Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 27.84 ug/l
-
- Collected
- Mar 9, 2009
- Sampling point
- SM1 SM1
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 090310-012HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- 0.002 mg/l
-
Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- 0.015 mg/l
-
Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- 0.01 mg/l
-
Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- 0.02 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Mar 9, 2009
- Sampling point
- SM2 SM2
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 090310-011HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- 0.01 mg/l
-
Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- 0.003 mg/l
-
Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- 0.01 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Feb 24, 2009
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 090225-001TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
-
Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 11.3 ug/l
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 11.3 ug/l
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2009 – Mar 31, 2009
-
- Collected
- Feb 24, 2009
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 090225-001HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
-
Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- 0.01 mg/l
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- 0.004 mg/l
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- 0.01 mg/l
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2009 – Mar 31, 2009
-
- Collected
- Nov 20, 2008
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 081121-002TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
-
Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
- Monitoring period
- Oct 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008
-
- Collected
- Nov 20, 2008
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 081121-002HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
-
Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
- Monitoring period
- Oct 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008
Routine (10).