This is a rebuild of Drinking Water Watch and not yet the official record. Use the agency’s current Drinking Water Watch for anything you need to rely on.
TTHM results
MS0250011 , North Hinds W/A #5-Limekiln
61 samples have been analysed for TTHM at North Hinds W/A #5-Limekiln.
This is one analyte out of the system’s whole record. For what has ever been detected here, and when, see all chemical and radiological results; for everything the system is tested for, see the analyte list.
What counts as a non-detect is defined in the help: Less than Indicator. This system’s violations.
No date range is applied: this list draws on every sample on record. Show the last two years only.
Every TTHM result
The table below lists 51–60 of 61 samples, newest first — collected July 31, 2007 to January 29, 2014.
10 TTHM results from the 10 samples listed here: 10 detected, 0 not detected. Those samples also carried 40 results for other analytes, which are on the full results page.
Units in this table
TTHM is recorded on this page in ug/l and mg/l. 1 mg/l = 1,000 ug/l.
We withheld the location of 2 sampling points below. The location on record identifies a private home, and we do not publish those. That is our decision, not the agency’s. The sampling point, its type and every result taken there are published unchanged.
| Result | Analyte | Monitoring period |
|---|---|---|
|
||
| 56.5 ug/l , sample collected Jan 29, 2014 09:10, sampling point SM1 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Jan 1, 2014 – Mar 31, 2014 |
|
||
| 12.98 ug/l , sample collected Oct 29, 2013 09:00, sampling point SM2 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Oct 1, 2013 – Dec 31, 2013 |
|
||
| 11.67 ug/l , sample collected Oct 29, 2013 08:45, sampling point SM1 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Oct 1, 2013 – Dec 31, 2013 |
|
||
| 72.3 ug/l , sample collected Jul 18, 2013 09:30, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Jul 1, 2013 – Sep 30, 2013 |
|
||
| 54.7 ug/l , sample collected Apr 18, 2013 10:15, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Apr 1, 2013 – Jun 30, 2013 |
|
||
| 45 ug/l , sample collected Feb 14, 2013 08:15, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Jan 1, 2013 – Mar 31, 2013 |
|
||
| 56.2 ug/l , sample collected Oct 30, 2012 09:00, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Oct 1, 2012 – Dec 31, 2012 |
|
||
| 137.6 ug/l , sample collected Jul 26, 2012 08:55, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Jul 1, 2012 – Sep 30, 2012 |
|
||
| 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Sep 24, 2008, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Jul 31, 2007, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007 |
-
- Collected
- Jan 29, 2014 09:10
- Sampling point
- SM1 Location withheld
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 140130-005TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2014 – Mar 31, 2014
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 56.5 ug/l
-
- Collected
- Oct 29, 2013 09:00
- Sampling point
- SM2 Location withheld
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 131030-006TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Oct 1, 2013 – Dec 31, 2013
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 12.98 ug/l
-
- Collected
- Oct 29, 2013 08:45
- Sampling point
- SM1 Location withheld
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 131030-005TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Oct 1, 2013 – Dec 31, 2013
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 11.67 ug/l
-
- Collected
- Jul 18, 2013 09:30
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 130719-010TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jul 1, 2013 – Sep 30, 2013
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 72.3 ug/l
-
- Collected
- Apr 18, 2013 10:15
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 130419-010TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Apr 1, 2013 – Jun 30, 2013
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 54.7 ug/l
-
- Collected
- Feb 14, 2013 08:15
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 130215-001TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2013 – Mar 31, 2013
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 45 ug/l
-
- Collected
- Oct 30, 2012 09:00
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 121031-019TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Oct 1, 2012 – Dec 31, 2012
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 56.2 ug/l
-
- Collected
- Jul 26, 2012 08:55
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 120727-001TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jul 1, 2012 – Sep 30, 2012
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 137.6 ug/l
-
- Collected
- Sep 24, 2008
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 080925-019TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
-
- Collected
- Jul 31, 2007
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 070801-023TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
Routine (10).