This is a rebuild of Drinking Water Watch and not yet the official record. Use the agency’s current Drinking Water Watch for anything you need to rely on.
Chemical and radiological sample results
MS0270025 , Freshwater Farms
19 of the 53 analytes this system has been tested for have been detected at least once, across 163 samples on record.
The other 34 were tested for and never found. An analyte is counted here if any result on record measured it, so this covers the whole history and not the samples listed below.
Across all 163 samples on record, detections range from December 22, 2000 to February 10, 2025. These figures cover the whole record.
What counts as a non-detect is defined in the help: Less than Indicator. This system’s violations.
What has been detected, ever
Every analyte measured above its reporting level at any point in this system’s record, most often detected first. This is not limited to the samples listed below.
| Analyte | Kind | Detected in | First detected | Last detected |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper, Free 1022 | Inorganic Chemical | 92 of 92 results | Dec 22, 2000 | Aug 29, 2024 |
| Lead 1030 | Inorganic Chemical | 58 of 92 results | Dec 22, 2000 | Aug 4, 2021 |
| Barium 1010 | Inorganic Chemical | 10 of 10 results | Sep 24, 2003 | Feb 10, 2025 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Organic Chemical | 6 of 8 results | Aug 16, 2007 | Feb 10, 2025 |
| TTHM 2950 | Organic Chemical | 6 of 8 results | Jun 9, 2004 | Feb 10, 2025 |
| Chromium 1020 | Inorganic Chemical | 6 of 10 results | Feb 9, 2004 | Mar 2, 2016 |
| Selenium 1045 | Inorganic Chemical | 3 of 10 results | Mar 16, 2005 | Apr 2, 2012 |
| Fluoride 1025 | Inorganic Chemical | 2 of 10 results | Mar 16, 2005 | Feb 10, 2025 |
| Nickel 1036 | Inorganic Chemical | 2 of 10 results | Apr 16, 2008 | Mar 2, 2016 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 | Organic Chemical | 2 of 4 results | Aug 15, 2012 | Sep 24, 2014 |
| Cadmium 1015 | Inorganic Chemical | 2 of 10 results | Mar 16, 2005 | Feb 6, 2006 |
| Sulfate 1055 | Inorganic Chemical | 2 of 2 results | Sep 24, 2003 | Feb 9, 2004 |
| Sodium 1052 | Inorganic Chemical | 1 of 1 result | Mar 8, 2021 | Mar 8, 2021 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 | Organic Chemical | 1 of 4 results | Sep 24, 2014 | Sep 24, 2014 |
| Chloroform 2941 | Organic Chemical | 1 of 5 results | Sep 24, 2014 | Sep 24, 2014 |
| Bromodichloromethane 2943 | Organic Chemical | 1 of 5 results | Sep 24, 2014 | Sep 24, 2014 |
| Dibromochloromethane 2944 | Organic Chemical | 1 of 5 results | Sep 24, 2014 | Sep 24, 2014 |
| Arsenic 1005 | Inorganic Chemical | 1 of 10 results | Apr 2, 2012 | Apr 2, 2012 |
| Thallium, Total 1085 | Inorganic Chemical | 1 of 10 results | Apr 2, 2012 | Apr 2, 2012 |
No date range is applied: this list draws on every sample on record. Show the last two years only.
The most recent samples, result by result
The table below lists 61–70 of 163 samples, newest first — collected August 12, 2009 to August 15, 2012. The summary above covers all 163.
45 results from the 10 samples listed here: 10 detected, 35 not detected. Across the whole record it is 198 of 642. A sample is analysed for many analytes at once, so one sample appears on as many rows as it had results.
Units in this table
TTHM is recorded on this page in ug/l and mg/l. 1 mg/l = 1,000 ug/l.
| Result | Analyte | Monitoring period |
|---|---|---|
|
||
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 15, 2012 01:15, sampling point MRT000 | Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 15, 2012 01:15, sampling point MRT000 | Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 15, 2012 01:15, sampling point MRT000 | Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 15, 2012 01:15, sampling point MRT000 | Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 4 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 15, 2012 01:15, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013 |
|
||
| Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 15, 2012 01:15, sampling point MRT000 | Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| 0.001 mg/l , sample collected Aug 15, 2012 01:15, sampling point MRT000 | Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 15, 2012 01:15, sampling point MRT000 | Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 15, 2012 01:15, sampling point MRT000 | Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 15, 2012 01:15, sampling point MRT000 | Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| 0.001 mg/l , sample collected Aug 15, 2012 01:15, sampling point MRT000 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013 |
|
||
| 0.00133 mg/l , sample collected Apr 2, 2012 12:40, sampling point TF101 | Arsenic 1005 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013 |
| 0.02072 mg/l , sample collected Apr 2, 2012 12:40, sampling point TF101 | Barium 1010 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Apr 2, 2012 12:40, sampling point TF101 | Cadmium 1015 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013 |
| 0.00101 mg/l , sample collected Apr 2, 2012 12:40, sampling point TF101 | Chromium 1020 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013 |
| Not detected below 0.1 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Apr 2, 2012 12:40, sampling point TF101 | Fluoride 1025 EPA method 380-75WE | Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Apr 2, 2012 12:40, sampling point TF101 | Mercury 1035 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Apr 2, 2012 12:40, sampling point TF101 | Nickel 1036 EPA method 200.8 | Not recorded |
| 0.00529 mg/l , sample collected Apr 2, 2012 12:40, sampling point TF101 | Selenium 1045 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Apr 2, 2012 12:40, sampling point TF101 | Antimony, Total 1074 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Apr 2, 2012 12:40, sampling point TF101 | Beryllium, Total 1075 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013 |
| 0.00128 mg/l , sample collected Apr 2, 2012 12:40, sampling point TF101 | Thallium, Total 1085 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013 |
|
||
| Not detected below 0.015 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Mar 26, 2012 12:30, sampling point TF101 | Cyanide 1024 EPA method QC10204001X | Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013 |
|
||
| Not detected below 0.1 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 8, 2012 01:45, sampling point TF101 | Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2012 – Dec 31, 2012 |
| Not detected below 0.08 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 8, 2012 01:45, sampling point TF101 | Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2012 – Dec 31, 2012 |
| Not detected below 0.02 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 8, 2012 01:45, sampling point TF101 | Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2012 – Dec 31, 2012 |
|
||
| Not detected below 0.1 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 7, 2011, sampling point TF101 | Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2011 |
| Not detected below 0.08 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 7, 2011, sampling point TF101 | Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2011 |
| Not detected below 0.02 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 7, 2011, sampling point TF101 | Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2011 |
|
||
| Not detected below 0.25 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 28, 2010, sampling point TF101 | Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| Not detected below 0.2 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 28, 2010, sampling point TF101 | Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| Not detected below 0.05 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 28, 2010, sampling point TF101 | Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 10, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 10, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 10, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 10, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Jun 10, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 10, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 10, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 10, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 10, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 10, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Jun 10, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| 0.0726 mg/l , sample collected Aug 12, 2009, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 12, 2009, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
-
- Collected
- Aug 15, 2012 01:15
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 120816-007TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
-
Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 4 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013
-
- Collected
- Aug 15, 2012 01:15
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 120816-007HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
-
Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- 0.001 mg/l
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- 0.001 mg/l
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013
-
- Collected
- Apr 2, 2012 12:40
- Sampling point
- TF101 Treatment Plant T101
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 120403-038IN
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
-
Arsenic 1005 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.00133 mg/l
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013
-
Barium 1010 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.02072 mg/l
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013
-
Cadmium 1015 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013
-
Chromium 1020 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.00101 mg/l
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013
-
Fluoride 1025 EPA method 380-75WE
- Result
- Not detected below 0.1 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013
-
Mercury 1035 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013
-
Nickel 1036 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Selenium 1045 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.00529 mg/l
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013
-
Antimony, Total 1074 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013
-
Beryllium, Total 1075 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013
-
Thallium, Total 1085 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.00128 mg/l
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013
-
- Collected
- Mar 26, 2012 12:30
- Sampling point
- TF101 Treatment Plant T101
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 120327-033CN
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013
-
Cyanide 1024 EPA method QC10204001X
- Result
- Not detected below 0.015 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Feb 8, 2012 01:45
- Sampling point
- TF101 Treatment Plant T101
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 120209-047NI
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2012 – Dec 31, 2012
-
Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.1 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.08 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.02 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Feb 7, 2011
- Sampling point
- TF101 Treatment Plant T101
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 110208-038NI
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2011
-
Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.1 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.08 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.02 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Jun 28, 2010
- Sampling point
- TF101 Treatment Plant T101
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100629-022NI
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.25 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.2 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.05 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Jun 10, 2010
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100611-001TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
-
Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
- Collected
- Jun 10, 2010
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100611-001HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
-
Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
- Collected
- Aug 12, 2009
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 090813-080PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0726 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
Routine (10).