Chemical and radiological sample results

MS0290017 ·, Ne Itawamba W/A #2-Salem

What has been detected, ever

Every analyte measured above its reporting level at any point in this system’s record, most often detected first. This is not limited to the samples listed below.

Scroll the table sideways for the dates.

No date range is applied: this list draws on every sample on record. Show the last two years only.

The most recent samples, result by result

The table below lists 111–120 of 196 samples, newest first — collected June 28, 2010 to September 21, 2011. The summary above covers all 196.

36 results from the 10 samples listed here: 27 detected, 9 not detected. Across the whole record it is 201 of 799. A sample is analysed for many analytes at once, so one sample appears on as many rows as it had results.

• Collected

  Sep 21, 2011

  Sampling point

  DS000 Distribution

  Sample type

  Routine

  Lab sample

  110923-076PB

  Laboratory

  MSDH Lab

  Monitoring period

  Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011

  • Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    0.0214 mg/l

  • Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

• Collected

  Sep 21, 2011

  Sampling point

  DS000 Distribution

  Sample type

  Routine

  Lab sample

  110923-075PB

  Laboratory

  MSDH Lab

  Monitoring period

  Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011

  • Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    0.116 mg/l

  • Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

• Collected

  Sep 21, 2011

  Sampling point

  DS000 Distribution

  Sample type

  Routine

  Lab sample

  110923-074PB

  Laboratory

  MSDH Lab

  Monitoring period

  Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011

  • Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    0.0353 mg/l

  • Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

• Collected

  Sep 21, 2011

  Sampling point

  DS000 Distribution

  Sample type

  Routine

  Lab sample

  110923-123PB

  Laboratory

  MSDH Lab

  Monitoring period

  Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011

  • Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    0.077 mg/l

  • Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

• Collected

  Sep 21, 2011

  Sampling point

  DS000 Distribution

  Sample type

  Routine

  Lab sample

  110923-124PB

  Laboratory

  MSDH Lab

  Monitoring period

  Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011

  • Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    0.2888 mg/l

  • Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

• Collected

  Sep 21, 2011

  Sampling point

  DS000 Distribution

  Sample type

  Routine

  Lab sample

  110923-122PB

  Laboratory

  MSDH Lab

  Monitoring period

  Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011

  • Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    0.0976 mg/l

  • Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

• Collected

  Sep 21, 2011

  Sampling point

  DS000 Distribution

  Sample type

  Routine

  Lab sample

  110923-073PB

  Laboratory

  MSDH Lab

  Monitoring period

  Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011

  • Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    0.1958 mg/l

  • Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

• Collected

  Jun 22, 2011

  Sampling point

  WL002 Well W002

  Sample type

  Routine

  Lab sample

  110624-005PC

  Laboratory

  MSDH Lab

  Monitoring period

  Not recorded

  • Calcium 1016 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    4.07 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.

  • Chloride 1017 EPA method 300.0

    Result

    1.384 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.

  • Fluoride 1025 EPA method 380-75WE

    Result

    0.091 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.

  • Iron 1028 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    6.66 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.

  • Magnesium 1031 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    1.31 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.

  • Manganese 1032 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    0.382 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.

  • Potassium 1042 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    0.87 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.

  • Sodium 1052 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    1.87 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.

  • Sulfate 1055 EPA method 300.0

    Result

    3.352 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.

  • Residue, Total, Filterable 1057 EPA method CALCUL LAB

    Result

    28 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.

  • Alkalinity, Caco3 Stability 1067 EPA method 2320B

    Result

    0 mg/l This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.

  • Carbon Dioxide 1901 EPA method CALCUL LAB

    Result

    48 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.

  • Hardness, Total (As Caco3) 1915 EPA method CALCUL LAB

    Result

    15.6 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.

  • Alkalinity, Total 1927 EPA method 2320B

    Result

    14.4 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.

  • Calculated Sodium NACA EPA method CALCUL LAB

    Result

    0 mg/l This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.

  • PH, Field Result PHFD EPA method 3500AL-D

    Result

    5.8 ph The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.

• Collected

  Feb 17, 2011

  Sampling point

  TF080 Treatment Plant T080

  Sample type

  Routine

  Lab sample

  110218-002NI

  Laboratory

  MSDH Lab

  Monitoring period

  Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2011

  • Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2

    Result

    0.35 mg/l

  • Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2

    Result

    0.34 mg/l

  • Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.02 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

• Collected

  Jun 28, 2010

  Sampling point

  TF080 Treatment Plant T080

  Sample type

  Routine

  Lab sample

  100629-059NI

  Laboratory

  MSDH Lab

  Monitoring period

  Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010

  • Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2

    Result

    0.27 mg/l

  • Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2

    Result

    0.27 mg/l

  • Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.05 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

Routine (10).