Skip to main content

Active , MS0290019 , Itawamba County

N. E. MS. Regional W/S

Alpha

This is a rebuild of Drinking Water Watch and not yet the official record. Use the agency’s current Drinking Water Watch for anything you need to rely on.

Population served
25
Population type
Wholesale
Federal type
Community (C)
State type
Community (C)
Water source, what the sources mean
Surface water 1 active of 3 on record
Service connections
11
Buys water from
None on record
Activity date
Not recorded

Who to contact

Riley, Danny, Secretary Treasurer
Contact types
Administrative Contact, Owner
Address
Po Box 2709, Tupelo MS 38803
Orr, Melvin OContact details not published for Orr, Melvin O
Contact type
Designated Operator
Briggs, Alan DContact details not published for Briggs, Alan D
Contact type
Operator
Farrar, James TContact details not published for Farrar, James T
Contact type
Operator
Holcomb, Steven DContact details not published for Holcomb, Steven D
Contact type
Operator
Jamerson, James WContact details not published for Jamerson, James W
Contact type
Operator
Mcferrin, Brad HContact details not published for Mcferrin, Brad H
Contact type
Operator

No phone number, email address or postal address is published for these contact types; contact details are published only for an Administrative Contact or Owner.

Where the water comes from

Source facilities for N. E. MS. Regional W/S
FacilityName TypeStatus
IN071 Intake IN071 Intake Active
IN070 Intake IN070 Intake Inactive
WL001 Well WL001 Well Inactive

  • Intake IN071

    Type
    Intake
    Status
    Active

  • Intake IN070

    Type
    Intake
    Status
    Inactive

  • Well WL001

    Type
    Well
    Status
    Inactive

Who it serves

Serves 2 service areas:

  • WHOLESALER (SELLS WATER)
    Type of service area
    Other
  • RESIDENTIAL AREA
    Type of service area
    Residential
Service connections by type and metering
Service connection typeMetering Connections
Combined ME 11

Operates year round.

This page shows only the operating periods in effect on September 25, 2026.

Compliance record

10 violations are listed below — validated and not in a violation group. All 31 validated violations, including 21 recorded in 7 violation groups. The most recent was determined Feb 26, 2025.

Please note: some of these violations may have been resolved and/or returned to compliance.

Each violation below links to the enforcement actions the agency has recorded against it.

Violations on record for N. E. MS. Regional W/S.
Fiscal year Violation Analyte Category Determined
2025 LSL Inventory-Initial, 13589 Lead and Copper Rule Revisions Treatment Technique Feb 26, 2025
2025 LSL Reporting-Initial, 13590 Lead and Copper Rule Revisions Reporting Feb 26, 2025
2012 MCL, Average, 13513 Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) Maximum Contaminant Level Aug 31, 2012
2012 MCL, Average, 13512 Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) Maximum Contaminant Level May 29, 2012
2012 MCL, Average, 13511 Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) Maximum Contaminant Level Mar 23, 2012
2012 MCL, Average, 13510 Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) Maximum Contaminant Level Mar 7, 2012
2006 Monitoring (TCR), Routine Minor, 10706 Coliform (TCR) Monitoring Apr 17, 2006
2000 MCL (TCR), Monthly, 100 Coliform (TCR) Maximum Contaminant Level Sep 23, 2000
1995 MCL (TCR), Monthly, 10195 Coliform (TCR) Maximum Contaminant Level Jan 31, 1995
1994 MCL (TCR), Monthly, 10694 Coliform (TCR) Maximum Contaminant Level Jun 30, 1994

  • LSL Inventory-Initial, 13589

    Determined
    Feb 26, 2025
    Category
    Treatment Technique
    Analyte
    Lead and Copper Rule Revisions
    Fiscal year
    2025

  • LSL Reporting-Initial, 13590

    Determined
    Feb 26, 2025
    Category
    Reporting
    Analyte
    Lead and Copper Rule Revisions
    Fiscal year
    2025

  • MCL, Average, 13513

    Determined
    Aug 31, 2012
    Category
    Maximum Contaminant Level
    Analyte
    Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5)
    Fiscal year
    2012

  • MCL, Average, 13512

    Determined
    May 29, 2012
    Category
    Maximum Contaminant Level
    Analyte
    Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5)
    Fiscal year
    2012

  • MCL, Average, 13511

    Determined
    Mar 23, 2012
    Category
    Maximum Contaminant Level
    Analyte
    Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5)
    Fiscal year
    2012

  • MCL, Average, 13510

    Determined
    Mar 7, 2012
    Category
    Maximum Contaminant Level
    Analyte
    Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5)
    Fiscal year
    2012

  • Monitoring (TCR), Routine Minor, 10706

    Determined
    Apr 17, 2006
    Category
    Monitoring
    Analyte
    Coliform (TCR)
    Fiscal year
    2006

  • MCL (TCR), Monthly, 100

    Determined
    Sep 23, 2000
    Category
    Maximum Contaminant Level
    Analyte
    Coliform (TCR)
    Fiscal year
    2000

  • MCL (TCR), Monthly, 10195

    Determined
    Jan 31, 1995
    Category
    Maximum Contaminant Level
    Analyte
    Coliform (TCR)
    Fiscal year
    1995

  • MCL (TCR), Monthly, 10694

    Determined
    Jun 30, 1994
    Category
    Maximum Contaminant Level
    Analyte
    Coliform (TCR)
    Fiscal year
    1994

What a violation is. Violations are issued for a public water system when there is a failure to meet certain state/region or federal drinking water regulations.

  • Monitoring — A MON violation is a violation of a monitoring requirement or a reporting requirement associated with the monitoring. A monitoring violation occurs when a public water system owner does not collect a required sample. A reporting violation occurs when a public water system owner does not report the result(s) to the state from a sample that was collected. When a public water system's owner does not collect a required sample, the violation is often referred to as a monitoring and reporting violation.
  • Reporting — A RPT violation occurs when public water system owners fail to report certain information. The RPT category does not include the failure to report analytical results, which falls under the MON category.
  • Public Notice — A PN violation occurs when a public water system owner does not notify the public about another violation in a timely or appropriate fashion.
  • Maximum Contaminant Level — An MCL violation means a contaminant has been detected above maximum contaminant level consistently in drinking water. MCL is the highest level of contamination that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) allows in drinking water. MCLs ensure that drinking water does not pose a short-term or long-term health risk.
  • Treatment Technique — A TT violation occurs when a public water system owner fails to apply a prescribed treatment technique by the allotted time. Actions that are classified as treatment techniques are broad. Examples of TT violations include: failure to employ a certified operator, inadequate removal of organic materials from raw water.

These definitions are quoted from the help text published with these pages.

This site shows what the agency publishes to the public. Records the agency holds but does not publish will not appear here, however complete this rebuild becomes.

Source. Mississippi State Department of Health, SDWIS/STATE, read when this page was built. What this site does and does not cover.

Not published here yet

  • Consumer Confidence Report generation, which the agency's application produces as a downloadable report
  • The Standardized Monitoring Framework spreadsheet the agency offers for download from a system's page

The agency publishes these; this rebuild does not carry them yet. Find them in Drinking Water Watch.