Alpha
This is a rebuild of Drinking Water Watch and not yet the official record. Use the agency’s current Drinking Water Watch for anything you need to rely on.
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) results
MS0300002 , Escatawpa Utility District
39 samples have been analysed for Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) at Escatawpa Utility District.
This is one analyte out of the system’s whole record. For what has ever been detected here, and when, see all chemical and radiological results; for everything the system is tested for, see the analyte list.
What counts as a non-detect is defined in the help: Less than Indicator. This system’s violations.
No date range is applied: this list draws on every sample on record. Show the last two years only.
Every Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) result
The table below lists 1–10 of 39 samples, newest first — collected February 15, 2010 to June 3, 2013.
10 Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) results from the 10 samples listed here: 7 detected, 3 not detected. Those samples also carried 50 results for other analytes, which are on the full results page.
| Result | Analyte | Monitoring period |
|---|---|---|
|
||
| Not detected below 0.006 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 3, 2013 02:05, sampling point MRT000 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Not recorded |
|
||
| 0.002 mg/l , sample collected Feb 28, 2012 02:05, sampling point MRT000 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Jan 1, 2012 – Dec 31, 2012 |
|
||
| 0.006 mg/l , sample collected Nov 15, 2011 02:30, sampling point MRT000 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Oct 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2011 |
|
||
| Not detected below 0.006 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 17, 2011 02:00, sampling point MRT000 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Jul 1, 2011 – Sep 30, 2011 |
|
||
| Not detected below 0.006 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected May 11, 2011, sampling point MRT000 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Apr 1, 2011 – Jun 30, 2011 |
|
||
| 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Feb 14, 2011, sampling point MRT000 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Jan 1, 2011 – Mar 31, 2011 |
|
||
| 0 mg/l This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. , sample collected Nov 16, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Oct 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| 0 mg/l This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. , sample collected Jul 20, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Jul 1, 2010 – Sep 30, 2010 |
|
||
| 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected May 10, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Apr 1, 2010 – Jun 30, 2010 |
|
||
| 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Feb 15, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Jan 1, 2010 – Mar 31, 2010 |
-
- Collected
- Jun 3, 2013 02:05
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 130604-014HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- Not detected below 0.006 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Feb 28, 2012 02:05
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 120229-007HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2012 – Dec 31, 2012
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- 0.002 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Nov 15, 2011 02:30
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 111116-008HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Oct 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2011
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- 0.006 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Aug 17, 2011 02:00
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 110818-006HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jul 1, 2011 – Sep 30, 2011
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- Not detected below 0.006 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- May 11, 2011
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 110512-011HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Apr 1, 2011 – Jun 30, 2011
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- Not detected below 0.006 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Feb 14, 2011
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 110215-011HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2011 – Mar 31, 2011
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
-
- Collected
- Nov 16, 2010
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 101117-001HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Oct 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- 0 mg/l This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here.
-
- Collected
- Jul 20, 2010
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100721-005HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jul 1, 2010 – Sep 30, 2010
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- 0 mg/l This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here.
-
- Collected
- May 10, 2010
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100511-012HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Apr 1, 2010 – Jun 30, 2010
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
-
- Collected
- Feb 15, 2010
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100216-001HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2010 – Mar 31, 2010
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
Routine (10).