Skip to main content
Alpha

This is a rebuild of Drinking Water Watch and not yet the official record. Use the agency’s current Drinking Water Watch for anything you need to rely on.

Chemical and radiological sample results

MS0300002 , Escatawpa Utility District

13 of the 13 analytes this system has been tested for have been detected at least once, across 160 samples on record.

The other 0 were tested for and never found. An analyte is counted here if any result on record measured it, so this covers the whole history and not the samples listed below.

Across all 160 samples on record, detections range from June 22, 2004 to June 24, 2013. These figures cover the whole record.

What counts as a non-detect is defined in the help: Less than Indicator. This system’s violations.

What has been detected, ever

Every analyte measured above its reporting level at any point in this system’s record, most often detected first. This is not limited to the samples listed below.

Every analyte ever detected for Escatawpa Utility District, with how many results found it and when it was first and last detected. Covers the whole record, not only the samples listed below.
Analyte Kind Detected in First detected Last detected
Copper, Free 1022 Inorganic Chemical 81 of 81 results Jun 22, 2004 Jun 24, 2013
Lead 1030 Inorganic Chemical 72 of 81 results Jun 22, 2004 Jun 24, 2013
TTHM 2950 Organic Chemical 38 of 40 results Sep 13, 2004 Jun 3, 2013
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 Organic Chemical 36 of 39 results Sep 13, 2004 Feb 28, 2012
Chloroform 2941 Organic Chemical 21 of 32 results May 15, 2006 Jun 3, 2013
Bromodichloromethane 2943 Organic Chemical 16 of 33 results May 15, 2006 Jun 3, 2013
Dibromochloromethane 2944 Organic Chemical 15 of 33 results May 15, 2006 Jun 3, 2013
Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 Organic Chemical 8 of 26 results Jan 30, 2008 Feb 28, 2012
Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 Organic Chemical 7 of 26 results Jan 30, 2008 Nov 15, 2011
Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 Organic Chemical 7 of 26 results Jan 30, 2008 Dec 2, 2009
Bromoform 2942 Organic Chemical 5 of 33 results Jul 16, 2007 Oct 27, 2008
Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 Organic Chemical 4 of 26 results Jan 30, 2008 Jan 13, 2009
Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 Organic Chemical 1 of 26 results Apr 29, 2008 Apr 29, 2008

No date range is applied: this list draws on every sample on record. Show the last two years only.

The most recent samples, result by result

The table below lists 71–80 of 160 samples, newest first — collected May 4, 2009 to August 18, 2009. The summary above covers all 160.

54 results from the 10 samples listed here: 11 detected, 43 not detected. Across the whole record it is 311 of 502. A sample is analysed for many analytes at once, so one sample appears on as many rows as it had results.

Chemical and radiological sample results for Escatawpa Utility District, every result from 71 to 80 of 160 samples shown, newest first. Not detected means the amount was below the level the laboratory can reliably report, which is given beside it.
Result Analyte Monitoring period
Collected
Aug 18, 2009
Sampling point
SM2 SM2
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
090819-004TH
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 18, 2009, sampling point SM2 Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 18, 2009, sampling point SM2 Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 18, 2009, sampling point SM2 Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 18, 2009, sampling point SM2 Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Aug 18, 2009, sampling point SM2 TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
Collected
Aug 18, 2009
Sampling point
SM1 SM1
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
090819-003TH
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 18, 2009, sampling point SM1 Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 18, 2009, sampling point SM1 Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 18, 2009, sampling point SM1 Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 18, 2009, sampling point SM1 Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Aug 18, 2009, sampling point SM1 TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
Collected
Aug 18, 2009
Sampling point
SM2 SM2
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
090819-004HA
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
0.002 mg/l , sample collected Aug 18, 2009, sampling point SM2 Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 18, 2009, sampling point SM2 Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 18, 2009, sampling point SM2 Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 18, 2009, sampling point SM2 Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 18, 2009, sampling point SM2 Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
0 mg/l This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. , sample collected Aug 18, 2009, sampling point SM2 Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 Not recorded
Collected
Aug 18, 2009
Sampling point
SM1 SM1
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
090819-003HA
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 18, 2009, sampling point SM1 Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 18, 2009, sampling point SM1 Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 18, 2009, sampling point SM1 Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 18, 2009, sampling point SM1 Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 18, 2009, sampling point SM1 Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Aug 18, 2009, sampling point SM1 Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 Not recorded
Collected
Jul 23, 2009
Sampling point
MRT000 Max. Res. Time
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
090724-009TH
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 23, 2009, sampling point MRT000 Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 23, 2009, sampling point MRT000 Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 23, 2009, sampling point MRT000 Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 23, 2009, sampling point MRT000 Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Jul 23, 2009, sampling point MRT000 TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 Jul 1, 2009 – Sep 30, 2009
Collected
Jul 23, 2009
Sampling point
MRT000 Max. Res. Time
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
090724-009HA
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 23, 2009, sampling point MRT000 Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 23, 2009, sampling point MRT000 Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 23, 2009, sampling point MRT000 Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 23, 2009, sampling point MRT000 Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 23, 2009, sampling point MRT000 Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Jul 23, 2009, sampling point MRT000 Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 Jul 1, 2009 – Sep 30, 2009
Collected
May 21, 2009
Sampling point
MRT000 Max. Res. Time
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
090522-004HA
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected May 21, 2009, sampling point MRT000 Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected May 21, 2009, sampling point MRT000 Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected May 21, 2009, sampling point MRT000 Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected May 21, 2009, sampling point MRT000 Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected May 21, 2009, sampling point MRT000 Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected May 21, 2009, sampling point MRT000 Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 Apr 1, 2009 – Jun 30, 2009
Collected
May 21, 2009
Sampling point
MRT000 Max. Res. Time
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
090522-004TH
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected May 21, 2009, sampling point MRT000 Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected May 21, 2009, sampling point MRT000 Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected May 21, 2009, sampling point MRT000 Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected May 21, 2009, sampling point MRT000 Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected May 21, 2009, sampling point MRT000 TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 Apr 1, 2009 – Jun 30, 2009
Collected
May 4, 2009
Sampling point
SM2 SM2
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
090505-022TH
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected May 4, 2009, sampling point SM2 Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected May 4, 2009, sampling point SM2 Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected May 4, 2009, sampling point SM2 Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected May 4, 2009, sampling point SM2 Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected May 4, 2009, sampling point SM2 TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
Collected
May 4, 2009
Sampling point
SM1 SM1
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
090505-021TH
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected May 4, 2009, sampling point SM1 Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected May 4, 2009, sampling point SM1 Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected May 4, 2009, sampling point SM1 Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected May 4, 2009, sampling point SM1 Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected May 4, 2009, sampling point SM1 TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded

Routine (10).