Alpha
This is a rebuild of Drinking Water Watch and not yet the official record. Use the agency’s current Drinking Water Watch for anything you need to rely on.
TTHM results
MS0300013 , Jackson Co. E Port Authority
20 samples have been analysed for TTHM at Jackson Co. E Port Authority.
This is one analyte out of the system’s whole record. For what has ever been detected here, and when, see all chemical and radiological results; for everything the system is tested for, see the analyte list.
What counts as a non-detect is defined in the help: Less than Indicator. This system’s violations.
No date range is applied: this list draws on every sample on record. Show the last two years only.
Every TTHM result
The table below lists 11–20 of 20 samples, newest first — collected September 13, 2004 to November 16, 2010.
10 TTHM results from the 10 samples listed here: 9 detected, 1 not detected. Those samples also carried 31 results for other analytes, which are on the full results page.
Units in this table
TTHM is recorded on this page in ug/l and mg/l. 1 mg/l = 1,000 ug/l.
| Result | Analyte | Monitoring period |
|---|---|---|
|
||
| 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Nov 16, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Oct 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Jul 20, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Jul 1, 2010 – Sep 30, 2010 |
|
||
| 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected May 12, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Apr 1, 2010 – Jun 30, 2010 |
|
||
| 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Feb 18, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Jan 1, 2010 – Mar 31, 2010 |
|
||
| 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Dec 1, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Oct 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009 |
|
||
| 2.18 ug/l , sample collected Jul 28, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Jul 1, 2009 – Sep 30, 2009 |
|
||
| 132.28 ug/l , sample collected May 20, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Apr 1, 2009 – Jun 30, 2009 |
|
||
| 193.42 ug/l , sample collected Jul 14, 2008, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Jul 1, 2008 – Sep 30, 2008 |
|
||
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Dec 5, 2005, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2005 |
|
||
| 69.1 ug/l , sample collected Sep 13, 2004, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Jan 1, 2004 – Dec 31, 2004 |
-
- Collected
- Nov 16, 2010
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 101117-005TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Oct 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
-
- Collected
- Jul 20, 2010
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100721-017TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jul 1, 2010 – Sep 30, 2010
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
-
- Collected
- May 12, 2010
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100513-011TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Apr 1, 2010 – Jun 30, 2010
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
-
- Collected
- Feb 18, 2010
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100219-003TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2010 – Mar 31, 2010
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
-
- Collected
- Dec 1, 2009
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 091202-005TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Oct 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
-
- Collected
- Jul 28, 2009
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 090729-005TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jul 1, 2009 – Sep 30, 2009
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 2.18 ug/l
-
- Collected
- May 20, 2009
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 090521-008TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Apr 1, 2009 – Jun 30, 2009
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 132.28 ug/l
-
- Collected
- Jul 14, 2008
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 080715-001TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jul 1, 2008 – Sep 30, 2008
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 193.42 ug/l
-
- Collected
- Dec 5, 2005
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 051206-002TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2005
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Sep 13, 2004
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 040914-039TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2004 – Dec 31, 2004
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 69.1 ug/l
Routine (10).