This is a rebuild of Drinking Water Watch and not yet the official record. Use the agency’s current Drinking Water Watch for anything you need to rely on.
Chemical and radiological sample results
MS0340016 , Town of Sandersville
26 of the 58 analytes this system has been tested for have been detected at least once, across 282 samples on record.
The other 32 were tested for and never found. An analyte is counted here if any result on record measured it, so this covers the whole history and not the samples listed below.
Across all 282 samples on record, detections range from September 24, 2003 to December 3, 2025. These figures cover the whole record.
What counts as a non-detect is defined in the help: Less than Indicator. This system’s violations.
What has been detected, ever
Every analyte measured above its reporting level at any point in this system’s record, most often detected first. This is not limited to the samples listed below.
| Analyte | Kind | Detected in | First detected | Last detected |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper, Free 1022 | Inorganic Chemical | 53 of 53 results | Jul 24, 2007 | Jun 30, 2020 |
| TTHM 2950 | Organic Chemical | 44 of 45 results | Sep 20, 2004 | Jun 23, 2025 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Organic Chemical | 40 of 43 results | Sep 20, 2004 | Jun 23, 2025 |
| Chloroform 2941 | Organic Chemical | 32 of 33 results | Mar 1, 2006 | Mar 2, 2020 |
| Bromodichloromethane 2943 | Organic Chemical | 30 of 33 results | Mar 1, 2006 | Mar 2, 2020 |
| Dibromochloromethane 2944 | Organic Chemical | 29 of 33 results | Mar 1, 2006 | Mar 2, 2020 |
| Lead 1030 | Inorganic Chemical | 25 of 53 results | Jul 24, 2007 | Jun 30, 2020 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 | Organic Chemical | 22 of 24 results | Jan 28, 2008 | Jun 25, 2018 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 | Organic Chemical | 22 of 24 results | Jan 28, 2008 | Jun 25, 2018 |
| Barium 1010 | Inorganic Chemical | 20 of 20 results | Sep 24, 2003 | Dec 3, 2025 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 | Organic Chemical | 18 of 24 results | Jan 28, 2008 | Jun 25, 2018 |
| Fluoride 1025 | Inorganic Chemical | 17 of 20 results | Sep 24, 2003 | Dec 3, 2025 |
| Gross Alpha, Incl. Radon & U 4002 | Radionuclide | 10 of 10 results | Dec 7, 2011 | Jul 10, 2012 |
| Chromium 1020 | Inorganic Chemical | 9 of 20 results | Sep 24, 2003 | Dec 3, 2025 |
| Bromoform 2942 | Organic Chemical | 8 of 33 results | Mar 1, 2006 | Feb 1, 2010 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 | Organic Chemical | 8 of 24 results | Oct 29, 2008 | Dec 3, 2009 |
| Sodium 1052 | Inorganic Chemical | 6 of 6 results | Sep 19, 2019 | Feb 5, 2025 |
| Carbon Tetrachloride 2982 | Organic Chemical | 6 of 39 results | Aug 4, 2004 | Mar 16, 2021 |
| Combined Radium (-226 & -228) 4010 | Radionuclide | 5 of 10 results | Dec 7, 2011 | Jul 10, 2012 |
| Radium-226 4020 | Radionuclide | 5 of 10 results | Dec 7, 2011 | Jul 10, 2012 |
| Nickel 1036 | Inorganic Chemical | 4 of 20 results | Mar 8, 2004 | Apr 13, 2015 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 | Organic Chemical | 4 of 24 results | May 20, 2009 | Jun 5, 2012 |
| Sulfate 1055 | Inorganic Chemical | 4 of 4 results | Sep 24, 2003 | Mar 8, 2004 |
| Arsenic 1005 | Inorganic Chemical | 2 of 20 results | Mar 8, 2004 | Feb 22, 2006 |
| Dichloromethane 2964 | Organic Chemical | 2 of 39 results | Aug 4, 2004 | Aug 4, 2004 |
| Selenium 1045 | Inorganic Chemical | 1 of 20 results | Mar 8, 2004 | Mar 8, 2004 |
No date range is applied: this list draws on every sample on record. Show the last two years only.
The most recent samples, result by result
The table below lists 161–170 of 282 samples, newest first — collected September 23, 2009 to February 1, 2010. The summary above covers all 282.
50 results from the 10 samples listed here: 34 detected, 16 not detected. Across the whole record it is 426 of 1,679. A sample is analysed for many analytes at once, so one sample appears on as many rows as it had results.
Units in this table
TTHM is recorded on this page in ug/l and mg/l. 1 mg/l = 1,000 ug/l.
| Result | Analyte | Monitoring period |
|---|---|---|
|
||
| Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 1, 2010, sampling point SM1 | Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 1, 2010, sampling point SM1 | Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 1, 2010, sampling point SM1 | Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 1, 2010, sampling point SM1 | Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 1, 2010, sampling point SM1 | Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Feb 1, 2010, sampling point SM1 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Not recorded |
|
||
| 35.8 ug/l , sample collected Feb 1, 2010, sampling point SM2 | Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| 1.1 ug/l , sample collected Feb 1, 2010, sampling point SM2 | Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| 27.1 ug/l , sample collected Feb 1, 2010, sampling point SM2 | Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| 11.4 ug/l , sample collected Feb 1, 2010, sampling point SM2 | Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| 75.4 ug/l , sample collected Feb 1, 2010, sampling point SM2 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
|
||
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 1, 2010, sampling point SM1 | Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 1, 2010, sampling point SM1 | Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 1, 2010, sampling point SM1 | Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 1, 2010, sampling point SM1 | Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Feb 1, 2010, sampling point SM1 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
|
||
| 19.7 ug/l , sample collected Dec 3, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Dec 3, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| 13.5 ug/l , sample collected Dec 3, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| 7.37 ug/l , sample collected Dec 3, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| 40.57 ug/l , sample collected Dec 3, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Oct 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009 |
|
||
| 0.004 mg/l , sample collected Dec 3, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| 0.008 mg/l , sample collected Dec 3, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| 0.016 mg/l , sample collected Dec 3, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Dec 3, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| 0.002 mg/l , sample collected Dec 3, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| 0.03 mg/l , sample collected Dec 3, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Oct 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009 |
|
||
| 0.005 mg/l , sample collected Nov 2, 2009, sampling point SM2 | Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| 0.011 mg/l , sample collected Nov 2, 2009, sampling point SM2 | Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| 0.015 mg/l , sample collected Nov 2, 2009, sampling point SM2 | Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Nov 2, 2009, sampling point SM2 | Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| 0.002 mg/l , sample collected Nov 2, 2009, sampling point SM2 | Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| 0.03 mg/l , sample collected Nov 2, 2009, sampling point SM2 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Not recorded |
|
||
| 0.005 mg/l , sample collected Nov 2, 2009, sampling point SM1 | Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| 0.007 mg/l , sample collected Nov 2, 2009, sampling point SM1 | Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| 0.012 mg/l , sample collected Nov 2, 2009, sampling point SM1 | Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Nov 2, 2009, sampling point SM1 | Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| 0.002 mg/l , sample collected Nov 2, 2009, sampling point SM1 | Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| 0.02 mg/l , sample collected Nov 2, 2009, sampling point SM1 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Not recorded |
|
||
| 28.9 ug/l , sample collected Nov 2, 2009, sampling point SM2 | Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Nov 2, 2009, sampling point SM2 | Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| 17 ug/l , sample collected Nov 2, 2009, sampling point SM2 | Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| 9.2 ug/l , sample collected Nov 2, 2009, sampling point SM2 | Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| 55.1 ug/l , sample collected Nov 2, 2009, sampling point SM2 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
|
||
| 21.7 ug/l , sample collected Nov 2, 2009, sampling point SM1 | Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Nov 2, 2009, sampling point SM1 | Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| 14.3 ug/l , sample collected Nov 2, 2009, sampling point SM1 | Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| 7.59 ug/l , sample collected Nov 2, 2009, sampling point SM1 | Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| 43.59 ug/l , sample collected Nov 2, 2009, sampling point SM1 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
|
||
| Not detected below 0.015 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 23, 2009, sampling point TF101 | Cyanide 1024 EPA method QC10204001X | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
-
- Collected
- Feb 1, 2010
- Sampling point
- SM1 SM1
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100202-009HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
-
- Collected
- Feb 1, 2010
- Sampling point
- SM2 SM2
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100202-010TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 35.8 ug/l
-
Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 1.1 ug/l
-
Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 27.1 ug/l
-
Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 11.4 ug/l
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 75.4 ug/l
-
- Collected
- Feb 1, 2010
- Sampling point
- SM1 SM1
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100202-009TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
-
- Collected
- Dec 3, 2009
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 091204-002TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
-
Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 19.7 ug/l
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 13.5 ug/l
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 7.37 ug/l
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 40.57 ug/l
- Monitoring period
- Oct 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009
-
- Collected
- Dec 3, 2009
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 091204-008HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
-
Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- 0.004 mg/l
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- 0.008 mg/l
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- 0.016 mg/l
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- 0.002 mg/l
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- 0.03 mg/l
- Monitoring period
- Oct 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009
-
- Collected
- Nov 2, 2009
- Sampling point
- SM2 SM2
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 091103-020HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- 0.005 mg/l
-
Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- 0.011 mg/l
-
Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- 0.015 mg/l
-
Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- 0.002 mg/l
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- 0.03 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Nov 2, 2009
- Sampling point
- SM1 SM1
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 091103-019HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- 0.005 mg/l
-
Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- 0.007 mg/l
-
Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- 0.012 mg/l
-
Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- 0.002 mg/l
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- 0.02 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Nov 2, 2009
- Sampling point
- SM2 SM2
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 091103-040TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 28.9 ug/l
-
Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 17 ug/l
-
Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 9.2 ug/l
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 55.1 ug/l
-
- Collected
- Nov 2, 2009
- Sampling point
- SM1 SM1
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 091103-039TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 21.7 ug/l
-
Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 14.3 ug/l
-
Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 7.59 ug/l
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 43.59 ug/l
-
- Collected
- Sep 23, 2009
- Sampling point
- TF101 Treatment Plant T101
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 090924-017CN
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Cyanide 1024 EPA method QC10204001X
- Result
- Not detected below 0.015 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
Routine (10).