Skip to main content
Alpha

This is a rebuild of Drinking Water Watch and not yet the official record. Use the agency’s current Drinking Water Watch for anything you need to rely on.

Chemical and radiological sample results

MS0340035 , Southern Hen Inc

28 of the 68 analytes this system has been tested for have been detected at least once, across 152 samples on record.

The other 40 were tested for and never found. An analyte is counted here if any result on record measured it, so this covers the whole history and not the samples listed below.

Across all 152 samples on record, detections range from September 24, 2003 to February 25, 2025. These figures cover the whole record.

What counts as a non-detect is defined in the help: Less than Indicator. This system’s violations.

What has been detected, ever

Every analyte measured above its reporting level at any point in this system’s record, most often detected first. This is not limited to the samples listed below.

Every analyte ever detected for Southern Hen Inc, with how many results found it and when it was first and last detected. Covers the whole record, not only the samples listed below.
Analyte Kind Detected in First detected Last detected
Copper, Free 1022 Inorganic Chemical 67 of 67 results Aug 17, 2004 Aug 23, 2023
Lead 1030 Inorganic Chemical 22 of 68 results Aug 17, 2004 Jul 2, 2020
Barium 1010 Inorganic Chemical 11 of 11 results Sep 24, 2003 Feb 25, 2025
Nickel 1036 Inorganic Chemical 9 of 11 results Mar 21, 2005 Feb 25, 2025
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 Organic Chemical 4 of 18 results Aug 14, 2007 Dec 13, 2022
Beryllium, Total 1075 Inorganic Chemical 4 of 11 results Sep 24, 2003 May 10, 2010
Sulfate 1055 Inorganic Chemical 4 of 4 results Sep 24, 2003 Feb 19, 2010
Arsenic 1005 Inorganic Chemical 3 of 11 results May 10, 2010 Aug 29, 2022
Sodium 1052 Inorganic Chemical 2 of 2 results Feb 19, 2010 Feb 15, 2022
TTHM 2950 Organic Chemical 2 of 18 results Aug 14, 2007 Jun 1, 2010
Calcium 1016 Inorganic Chemical 2 of 2 results Feb 19, 2010 Feb 19, 2010
Iron 1028 Inorganic Chemical 2 of 2 results Feb 19, 2010 Feb 19, 2010
Magnesium 1031 Inorganic Chemical 2 of 2 results Feb 19, 2010 Feb 19, 2010
Potassium 1042 Inorganic Chemical 2 of 2 results Feb 19, 2010 Feb 19, 2010
Residue, Total, Filterable 1057 Water Quality 2 of 2 results Feb 19, 2010 Feb 19, 2010
Alkalinity, Caco3 Stability 1067 Water Quality 2 of 2 results Feb 19, 2010 Feb 19, 2010
Carbon Dioxide 1901 Water Quality 2 of 2 results Feb 19, 2010 Feb 19, 2010
Color 1905 Water Quality 2 of 2 results Feb 19, 2010 Feb 19, 2010
Hardness, Total (As Caco3) 1915 Water Quality 2 of 2 results Feb 19, 2010 Feb 19, 2010
Alkalinity, Total 1927 Water Quality 2 of 2 results Feb 19, 2010 Feb 19, 2010
Iron, Field Result FEFD Inorganic Chemical 2 of 2 results Feb 19, 2010 Feb 19, 2010
Calculated Sodium NACA Water Quality 2 of 2 results Feb 19, 2010 Feb 19, 2010
PH, Field Result PHFD Water Quality 2 of 2 results Feb 19, 2010 Feb 19, 2010
Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 Organic Chemical 1 of 13 results Aug 14, 2018 Aug 14, 2018
Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 Organic Chemical 1 of 13 results Aug 14, 2018 Aug 14, 2018
Chromium 1020 Inorganic Chemical 1 of 11 results Apr 13, 2015 Apr 13, 2015
Manganese 1032 Inorganic Chemical 1 of 1 result Feb 19, 2010 Feb 19, 2010
Dichloromethane 2964 Organic Chemical 1 of 8 results Aug 4, 2004 Aug 4, 2004

No date range is applied: this list draws on every sample on record. Show the last two years only.

The most recent samples, result by result

The table below lists 101–110 of 152 samples, newest first — collected February 19, 2010 to July 31, 2011. The summary above covers all 152.

53 results from the 10 samples listed here: 25 detected, 28 not detected. Across the whole record it is 159 of 697. A sample is analysed for many analytes at once, so one sample appears on as many rows as it had results.

Chemical and radiological sample results for Southern Hen Inc, every result from 101 to 110 of 152 samples shown, newest first. Not detected means the amount was below the level the laboratory can reliably report, which is given beside it.
Result Analyte Monitoring period
Collected
Jul 31, 2011
Sampling point
DS000 Distribution
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
110802-004PB
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
0.0044 mg/l , sample collected Jul 31, 2011, sampling point DS000 Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 31, 2011, sampling point DS000 Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011
Collected
Jul 31, 2011
Sampling point
DS000 Distribution
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
110802-003PB
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
0.2829 mg/l , sample collected Jul 31, 2011, sampling point DS000 Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 31, 2011, sampling point DS000 Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011
Collected
Jul 31, 2011
Sampling point
DS000 Distribution
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
110802-002PB
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
0.2962 mg/l , sample collected Jul 31, 2011, sampling point DS000 Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 31, 2011, sampling point DS000 Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011
Collected
Feb 14, 2011
Sampling point
TF080 Treatment Plant T080
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
110215-088NI
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
Not detected below 0.1 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 14, 2011, sampling point TF080 Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2 Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2011
Not detected below 0.08 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 14, 2011, sampling point TF080 Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2 Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2011
Not detected below 0.02 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 14, 2011, sampling point TF080 Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2 Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2011
Collected
Aug 9, 2010
Sampling point
TF080 Treatment Plant T080
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
100810-073NI
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
Not detected below 0.25 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 9, 2010, sampling point TF080 Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2 Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.2 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 9, 2010, sampling point TF080 Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2 Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.05 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 9, 2010, sampling point TF080 Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2 Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010
Collected
Jun 1, 2010
Sampling point
MRT000 Max. Res. Time
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
100602-001TH
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 1, 2010, sampling point MRT000 Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 1, 2010, sampling point MRT000 Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 1, 2010, sampling point MRT000 Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 1, 2010, sampling point MRT000 Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Jun 1, 2010, sampling point MRT000 TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Collected
Jun 1, 2010
Sampling point
MRT000 Max. Res. Time
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
100602-001HA
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 1, 2010, sampling point MRT000 Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 1, 2010, sampling point MRT000 Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 1, 2010, sampling point MRT000 Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 1, 2010, sampling point MRT000 Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 1, 2010, sampling point MRT000 Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Jun 1, 2010, sampling point MRT000 Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Collected
May 10, 2010
Sampling point
TF080 Treatment Plant T080
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
100511-029IN
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
0.0006 mg/l , sample collected May 10, 2010, sampling point TF080 Arsenic 1005 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
0.0317 mg/l , sample collected May 10, 2010, sampling point TF080 Barium 1010 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected May 10, 2010, sampling point TF080 Cadmium 1015 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected May 10, 2010, sampling point TF080 Chromium 1020 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.1 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected May 10, 2010, sampling point TF080 Fluoride 1025 EPA method 380-75WE Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected May 10, 2010, sampling point TF080 Mercury 1035 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
0.0036 mg/l , sample collected May 10, 2010, sampling point TF080 Nickel 1036 EPA method 200.8 Not recorded
Not detected below 0.0025 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected May 10, 2010, sampling point TF080 Selenium 1045 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected May 10, 2010, sampling point TF080 Antimony, Total 1074 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
0.0005 mg/l , sample collected May 10, 2010, sampling point TF080 Beryllium, Total 1075 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected May 10, 2010, sampling point TF080 Thallium, Total 1085 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Collected
May 3, 2010
Sampling point
TF080 Treatment Plant T080
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
100504-012CN
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
Not detected below 15 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected May 3, 2010, sampling point TF080 Cyanide 1024 EPA method QC10204001X Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Collected
Feb 19, 2010
Sampling point
WL003 Well W003
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
100222-003PC
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
1.43 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Feb 19, 2010, sampling point WL003 Calcium 1016 EPA method 200.8 Not recorded
Not detected below 2.5 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 19, 2010, sampling point WL003 Chloride 1017 EPA method 300.0 Not recorded
Not detected below 0.1 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 19, 2010, sampling point WL003 Fluoride 1025 EPA method 380-75WE Not recorded
0.405 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Feb 19, 2010, sampling point WL003 Iron 1028 EPA method 200.8 Not recorded
0.572 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Feb 19, 2010, sampling point WL003 Magnesium 1031 EPA method 200.8 Not recorded
0.013 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Feb 19, 2010, sampling point WL003 Manganese 1032 EPA method 200.8 Not recorded
1.87 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Feb 19, 2010, sampling point WL003 Potassium 1042 EPA method 200.8 Not recorded
2.09 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Feb 19, 2010, sampling point WL003 Sodium 1052 EPA method 200.8 Not recorded
9.81 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Feb 19, 2010, sampling point WL003 Sulfate 1055 EPA method 300.0 Not recorded
20 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Feb 19, 2010, sampling point WL003 Residue, Total, Filterable 1057 EPA method CALCUL LAB Not recorded
0 mg/l This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Feb 19, 2010, sampling point WL003 Alkalinity, Caco3 Stability 1067 EPA method 2320B Not recorded
5 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Feb 19, 2010, sampling point WL003 Carbon Dioxide 1901 EPA method CALCUL LAB Not recorded
20 units The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Feb 19, 2010, sampling point WL003 Color 1905 EPA method 2120B Not recorded
6 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Feb 19, 2010, sampling point WL003 Hardness, Total (As Caco3) 1915 EPA method CALCUL LAB Not recorded
3.05 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Feb 19, 2010, sampling point WL003 Alkalinity, Total 1927 EPA method 2320B Not recorded
0.85 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Feb 19, 2010, sampling point WL003 Iron, Field Result FEFD EPA method 3500AL-D Not recorded
3.3 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Feb 19, 2010, sampling point WL003 Calculated Sodium NACA EPA method CALCUL LAB Not recorded
6.1 ph The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Feb 19, 2010, sampling point WL003 PH, Field Result PHFD EPA method 3500AL-D Not recorded

Routine (10).