This is a rebuild of Drinking Water Watch and not yet the official record. Use the agency’s current Drinking Water Watch for anything you need to rely on.
Chemical and radiological sample results
MS0350019 , Kipling W/A #3-Old Scooba Rd
9 of the 13 analytes this system has been tested for have been detected at least once, across 55 samples on record.
The other 4 were tested for and never found. An analyte is counted here if any result on record measured it, so this covers the whole history and not the samples listed below.
Across all 55 samples on record, detections range from June 21, 2004 to April 30, 2025. These figures cover the whole record.
What counts as a non-detect is defined in the help: Less than Indicator. This system’s violations.
What has been detected, ever
Every analyte measured above its reporting level at any point in this system’s record, most often detected first. This is not limited to the samples listed below.
| Analyte | Kind | Detected in | First detected | Last detected |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper, Free 1022 | Inorganic Chemical | 35 of 35 results | Sep 23, 2004 | Aug 23, 2023 |
| TTHM 2950 | Organic Chemical | 8 of 10 results | Jun 21, 2004 | Apr 30, 2025 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Organic Chemical | 4 of 10 results | Jun 13, 2007 | Apr 30, 2025 |
| Dibromochloromethane 2944 | Organic Chemical | 4 of 6 results | Jun 13, 2007 | Jul 23, 2014 |
| Lead 1030 | Inorganic Chemical | 4 of 35 results | Sep 23, 2004 | Jun 15, 2011 |
| Bromodichloromethane 2943 | Organic Chemical | 3 of 6 results | Aug 24, 2009 | Aug 23, 2017 |
| Bromoform 2942 | Organic Chemical | 3 of 6 results | Jun 30, 2008 | Jun 29, 2011 |
| Chloroform 2941 | Organic Chemical | 2 of 6 results | Jun 29, 2011 | Aug 23, 2017 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 | Organic Chemical | 1 of 5 results | Jul 23, 2014 | Jul 23, 2014 |
No date range is applied: this list draws on every sample on record. Show the last two years only.
The most recent samples, result by result
The table below lists 31–40 of 55 samples, newest first — collected August 7, 2008 to June 29, 2011. The summary above covers all 55.
34 results from the 10 samples listed here: 16 detected, 18 not detected. Across the whole record it is 64 of 139. A sample is analysed for many analytes at once, so one sample appears on as many rows as it had results.
| Result | Analyte | Monitoring period |
|---|---|---|
|
||
| 1.12 ug/l , sample collected Jun 29, 2011 01:45, sampling point MRT000 | Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| 1.05 ug/l , sample collected Jun 29, 2011 01:45, sampling point MRT000 | Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| 1.17 ug/l , sample collected Jun 29, 2011 01:45, sampling point MRT000 | Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| 1.58 ug/l , sample collected Jun 29, 2011 01:45, sampling point MRT000 | Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| 4.92 ug/l , sample collected Jun 29, 2011 01:45, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2012 |
|
||
| Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 29, 2011 01:45, sampling point MRT000 | Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 29, 2011 01:45, sampling point MRT000 | Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 29, 2011 01:45, sampling point MRT000 | Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 29, 2011 01:45, sampling point MRT000 | Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 29, 2011 01:45, sampling point MRT000 | Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.006 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 29, 2011 01:45, sampling point MRT000 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2012 |
|
||
| 0.0117 mg/l , sample collected Jun 15, 2011, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 15, 2011, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011 |
|
||
| 0.0113 mg/l , sample collected Jun 15, 2011, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011 |
| 0.0007 mg/l , sample collected Jun 15, 2011, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011 |
|
||
| 0.0025 mg/l , sample collected Jun 15, 2011, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 15, 2011, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011 |
|
||
| 0.0115 mg/l , sample collected Jun 15, 2011, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 15, 2011, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011 |
|
||
| 0.0125 mg/l , sample collected Jun 15, 2011, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 15, 2011, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011 |
|
||
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 24, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| 1.06 ug/l , sample collected Aug 24, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| 1.01 ug/l , sample collected Aug 24, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| 1.53 ug/l , sample collected Aug 24, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected , sample collected Aug 24, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009 |
|
||
| Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 24, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 24, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 24, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 24, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 24, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Aug 24, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009 |
|
||
| 0.0017 mg/l , sample collected Aug 7, 2008, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 7, 2008, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
-
- Collected
- Jun 29, 2011 01:45
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 110630-008TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
-
Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 1.12 ug/l
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 1.05 ug/l
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 1.17 ug/l
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 1.58 ug/l
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 4.92 ug/l
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2012
-
- Collected
- Jun 29, 2011 01:45
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 110630-008HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
-
Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- Not detected below 0.006 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2012
-
- Collected
- Jun 15, 2011
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 110616-170PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0117 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Jun 15, 2011
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 110616-169PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0113 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0007 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Jun 15, 2011
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 110616-168PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0025 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Jun 15, 2011
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 110616-167PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0115 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Jun 15, 2011
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 110616-166PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0125 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Aug 24, 2009
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 090825-015TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
-
Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 1.06 ug/l
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 1.01 ug/l
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 1.53 ug/l
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009
-
- Collected
- Aug 24, 2009
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 090825-015HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
-
Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009
-
- Collected
- Aug 7, 2008
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 080807-055PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0017 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
Routine (10).