This is a rebuild of Drinking Water Watch and not yet the official record. Use the agency’s current Drinking Water Watch for anything you need to rely on.
Chemical and radiological sample results
MS0350025 , North West Kemper W/A #4
20 of the 56 analytes this system has been tested for have been detected at least once, across 200 samples on record.
The other 36 were tested for and never found. An analyte is counted here if any result on record measured it, so this covers the whole history and not the samples listed below.
Across all 200 samples on record, detections range from December 4, 2006 to December 2, 2025. These figures cover the whole record.
What counts as a non-detect is defined in the help: Less than Indicator. This system’s violations.
What has been detected, ever
Every analyte measured above its reporting level at any point in this system’s record, most often detected first. This is not limited to the samples listed below.
| Analyte | Kind | Detected in | First detected | Last detected |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper, Free 1022 | Inorganic Chemical | 117 of 120 results | Oct 18, 2007 | Aug 23, 2023 |
| Barium 1010 | Inorganic Chemical | 7 of 7 results | Dec 4, 2006 | Jan 10, 2024 |
| Nickel 1036 | Inorganic Chemical | 7 of 7 results | Dec 4, 2006 | Jan 10, 2024 |
| TTHM 2950 | Organic Chemical | 6 of 19 results | Jun 30, 2008 | Dec 2, 2025 |
| Lead 1030 | Inorganic Chemical | 6 of 120 results | Oct 18, 2007 | Aug 22, 2023 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Organic Chemical | 6 of 20 results | Jun 14, 2007 | May 2, 2022 |
| Chloroform 2941 | Organic Chemical | 5 of 14 results | Sep 6, 2012 | Dec 2, 2025 |
| Gross Alpha, Incl. Radon & U 4002 | Radionuclide | 5 of 5 results | Dec 14, 2011 | Jul 18, 2012 |
| Bromodichloromethane 2943 | Organic Chemical | 3 of 14 results | May 23, 2024 | Dec 2, 2025 |
| Sodium 1052 | Inorganic Chemical | 3 of 3 results | Sep 18, 2019 | Feb 5, 2025 |
| Dibromochloromethane 2944 | Organic Chemical | 2 of 14 results | Nov 21, 2024 | Dec 2, 2025 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 | Organic Chemical | 2 of 15 results | Jun 5, 2019 | Sep 15, 2020 |
| Chromium 1020 | Inorganic Chemical | 2 of 7 results | Apr 2, 2014 | May 24, 2017 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 | Inorganic Chemical | 1 of 21 results | Mar 27, 2024 | Mar 27, 2024 |
| Nitrate 1040 | Inorganic Chemical | 1 of 21 results | Mar 27, 2024 | Mar 27, 2024 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 | Organic Chemical | 1 of 15 results | Jun 5, 2019 | Jun 5, 2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 | Organic Chemical | 1 of 15 results | Jul 1, 2015 | Jul 1, 2015 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 | Organic Chemical | 1 of 15 results | Sep 6, 2012 | Sep 6, 2012 |
| Mercury 1035 | Inorganic Chemical | 1 of 7 results | Dec 4, 2006 | Dec 4, 2006 |
| Selenium 1045 | Inorganic Chemical | 1 of 7 results | Dec 4, 2006 | Dec 4, 2006 |
No date range is applied: this list draws on every sample on record. Show the last two years only.
The most recent samples, result by result
The table below lists 161–170 of 200 samples, newest first — collected June 30, 2008 to October 15, 2008. The summary above covers all 200.
23 results from the 10 samples listed here: 10 detected, 13 not detected. Across the whole record it is 178 of 648. A sample is analysed for many analytes at once, so one sample appears on as many rows as it had results.
| Result | Analyte | Monitoring period |
|---|---|---|
|
||
| 0.0023 mg/l , sample collected Oct 15, 2008, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jul 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Oct 15, 2008, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jul 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008 |
|
||
| 0.0013 mg/l , sample collected Oct 15, 2008, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jul 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Oct 15, 2008, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jul 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008 |
|
||
| 0.0027 mg/l , sample collected Oct 15, 2008, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jul 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Oct 15, 2008, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jul 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008 |
|
||
| 0.0024 mg/l , sample collected Oct 15, 2008, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jul 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Oct 15, 2008, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jul 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008 |
|
||
| 0.0022 mg/l , sample collected Oct 15, 2008, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jul 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Oct 15, 2008, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jul 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008 |
|
||
| 0.0027 mg/l , sample collected Oct 15, 2008, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jul 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Oct 15, 2008, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jul 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008 |
|
||
| 0.0009 mg/l , sample collected Oct 14, 2008, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jul 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Oct 14, 2008, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jul 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008 |
|
||
| 0.0016 mg/l , sample collected Oct 14, 2008, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jul 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Oct 14, 2008, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jul 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008 |
|
||
| 0.001 mg/l , sample collected Oct 4, 2008, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jul 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Oct 4, 2008, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jul 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008 |
|
||
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 30, 2008, sampling point MRT000 | Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 30, 2008, sampling point MRT000 | Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 30, 2008, sampling point MRT000 | Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 30, 2008, sampling point MRT000 | Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Jun 30, 2008, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
-
- Collected
- Oct 15, 2008
- Sampling point
- DS000
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 081017-058PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jul 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0023 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Oct 15, 2008
- Sampling point
- DS000
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 081017-056PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jul 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0013 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Oct 15, 2008
- Sampling point
- DS000
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 081017-055PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jul 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0027 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Oct 15, 2008
- Sampling point
- DS000
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 081017-053PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jul 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0024 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Oct 15, 2008
- Sampling point
- DS000
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 081017-052PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jul 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0022 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Oct 15, 2008
- Sampling point
- DS000
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 081017-046PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jul 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0027 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Oct 14, 2008
- Sampling point
- DS000
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 081017-065PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jul 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0009 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Oct 14, 2008
- Sampling point
- DS000
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 081017-061PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jul 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0016 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Oct 4, 2008
- Sampling point
- DS000
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 081017-057PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jul 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.001 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Jun 30, 2008
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 080701-015TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
-
Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Routine (10).