This is a rebuild of Drinking Water Watch and not yet the official record. Use the agency’s current Drinking Water Watch for anything you need to rely on.
Chemical and radiological sample results
MS0370007 , North Lumberton Utility Assn
23 of the 57 analytes this system has been tested for have been detected at least once, across 364 samples on record.
The other 34 were tested for and never found. An analyte is counted here if any result on record measured it, so this covers the whole history and not the samples listed below.
Across all 364 samples on record, detections range from September 29, 2003 to February 24, 2026. These figures cover the whole record.
What counts as a non-detect is defined in the help: Less than Indicator. This system’s violations.
What has been detected, ever
Every analyte measured above its reporting level at any point in this system’s record, most often detected first. This is not limited to the samples listed below.
| Analyte | Kind | Detected in | First detected | Last detected |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper, Free 1022 | Inorganic Chemical | 138 of 140 results | Aug 27, 2007 | Jul 24, 2024 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 | Inorganic Chemical | 46 of 67 results | May 17, 2004 | Feb 24, 2026 |
| Nitrate 1040 | Inorganic Chemical | 46 of 67 results | May 17, 2004 | Feb 24, 2026 |
| Barium 1010 | Inorganic Chemical | 30 of 30 results | Sep 29, 2003 | Feb 24, 2025 |
| Lead 1030 | Inorganic Chemical | 21 of 140 results | Aug 28, 2007 | Jul 24, 2024 |
| TTHM 2950 | Organic Chemical | 15 of 20 results | Aug 13, 2007 | Feb 3, 2025 |
| Gross Alpha, Incl. Radon & U 4002 | Radionuclide | 15 of 15 results | Mar 6, 2012 | Oct 5, 2012 |
| Bromodichloromethane 2943 | Organic Chemical | 11 of 15 results | Sep 21, 2009 | Nov 12, 2024 |
| Arsenic 1005 | Inorganic Chemical | 10 of 30 results | Sep 29, 2003 | Feb 24, 2025 |
| Chloroform 2941 | Organic Chemical | 10 of 15 results | Sep 21, 2009 | Nov 12, 2024 |
| Dibromochloromethane 2944 | Organic Chemical | 10 of 15 results | Sep 21, 2009 | Nov 12, 2024 |
| Fluoride 1025 | Inorganic Chemical | 9 of 30 results | Mar 1, 2004 | Feb 24, 2025 |
| Sodium 1052 | Inorganic Chemical | 9 of 9 results | Sep 24, 2019 | Feb 10, 2025 |
| Nickel 1036 | Inorganic Chemical | 8 of 30 results | Sep 29, 2003 | Feb 24, 2025 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Organic Chemical | 4 of 21 results | Sep 21, 2009 | Feb 3, 2025 |
| Chromium 1020 | Inorganic Chemical | 4 of 30 results | Mar 21, 2005 | Apr 1, 2019 |
| Bromoform 2942 | Organic Chemical | 3 of 15 results | Apr 22, 2019 | Aug 13, 2024 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 | Organic Chemical | 1 of 17 results | Nov 9, 2020 | Nov 9, 2020 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 | Organic Chemical | 1 of 17 results | Jun 15, 2020 | Jun 15, 2020 |
| Nitrite 1041 | Inorganic Chemical | 1 of 67 results | Jun 16, 2008 | Jun 16, 2008 |
| Xylenes, Total 2955 | Organic Chemical | 1 of 29 results | Aug 2, 2004 | Aug 2, 2004 |
| Ethylbenzene 2992 | Organic Chemical | 1 of 29 results | Aug 2, 2004 | Aug 2, 2004 |
| Sulfate 1055 | Inorganic Chemical | 1 of 6 results | Mar 1, 2004 | Mar 1, 2004 |
No date range is applied: this list draws on every sample on record. Show the last two years only.
The most recent samples, result by result
The table below lists 301–310 of 364 samples, newest first — collected August 13, 2007 to August 28, 2007. The summary above covers all 364.
23 results from the 10 samples listed here: 11 detected, 12 not detected. Across the whole record it is 395 of 1,726. A sample is analysed for many analytes at once, so one sample appears on as many rows as it had results.
| Result | Analyte | Monitoring period |
|---|---|---|
|
||
| 0.0033 mg/l , sample collected Aug 28, 2007, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 28, 2007, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007 |
|
||
| 0.0014 mg/l , sample collected Aug 28, 2007, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 28, 2007, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007 |
|
||
| 0.0045 mg/l , sample collected Aug 28, 2007, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 28, 2007, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007 |
|
||
| 0.0364 mg/l , sample collected Aug 28, 2007, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007 |
| 0.0006 mg/l , sample collected Aug 28, 2007, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007 |
|
||
| 0.007 mg/l , sample collected Aug 28, 2007, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 28, 2007, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007 |
|
||
| 0.0038 mg/l , sample collected Aug 28, 2007, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 28, 2007, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007 |
|
||
| 0.0037 mg/l , sample collected Aug 28, 2007, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 28, 2007, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007 |
|
||
| 0.0256 mg/l , sample collected Aug 28, 2007, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 28, 2007, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007 |
|
||
| 0.0034 mg/l , sample collected Aug 27, 2007, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 27, 2007, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007 |
|
||
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 13, 2007, sampling point MRT000 | Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 13, 2007, sampling point MRT000 | Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 13, 2007, sampling point MRT000 | Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 13, 2007, sampling point MRT000 | Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Aug 13, 2007, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007 |
-
- Collected
- Aug 28, 2007
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 070829-339PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0033 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Aug 28, 2007
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 070829-338PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0014 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Aug 28, 2007
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 070829-337PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0045 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Aug 28, 2007
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 070829-336PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0364 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0006 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Aug 28, 2007
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 070829-328PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.007 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Aug 28, 2007
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 070829-316PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0038 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Aug 28, 2007
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 070829-230PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0037 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Aug 28, 2007
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 070829-228PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0256 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Aug 27, 2007
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 070829-229PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0034 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Aug 13, 2007
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 070814-020TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
-
Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007
Routine (10).