This is a rebuild of Drinking Water Watch and not yet the official record. Use the agency’s current Drinking Water Watch for anything you need to rely on.
Chemical and radiological sample results
MS0370010 , Town of Sumrall
26 of the 58 analytes this system has been tested for have been detected at least once, across 193 samples on record.
The other 32 were tested for and never found. An analyte is counted here if any result on record measured it, so this covers the whole history and not the samples listed below.
Across all 193 samples on record, detections range from September 29, 2003 to December 29, 2025. These figures cover the whole record.
What counts as a non-detect is defined in the help: Less than Indicator. This system’s violations.
What has been detected, ever
Every analyte measured above its reporting level at any point in this system’s record, most often detected first. This is not limited to the samples listed below.
| Analyte | Kind | Detected in | First detected | Last detected |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper, Free 1022 | Inorganic Chemical | 60 of 60 results | Jul 31, 2007 | Sep 11, 2023 |
| Lead 1030 | Inorganic Chemical | 28 of 60 results | Jul 31, 2007 | Sep 11, 2023 |
| Barium 1010 | Inorganic Chemical | 14 of 14 results | Sep 29, 2003 | Feb 26, 2025 |
| Nickel 1036 | Inorganic Chemical | 13 of 14 results | Sep 29, 2003 | Feb 26, 2025 |
| Arsenic 1005 | Inorganic Chemical | 12 of 14 results | Sep 29, 2003 | Feb 26, 2025 |
| TTHM 2950 | Organic Chemical | 7 of 10 results | Jun 21, 2004 | Dec 29, 2025 |
| Sodium 1052 | Inorganic Chemical | 6 of 6 results | Sep 16, 2019 | Feb 18, 2025 |
| Gross Alpha, Incl. Radon & U 4002 | Radionuclide | 6 of 7 results | Dec 13, 2011 | Dec 15, 2015 |
| Combined Radium (-226 & -228) 4010 | Radionuclide | 6 of 7 results | Dec 13, 2011 | Dec 15, 2015 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Organic Chemical | 5 of 12 results | Sep 22, 2009 | Dec 8, 2025 |
| Nitrite 1041 | Inorganic Chemical | 5 of 34 results | Aug 15, 2005 | Feb 22, 2023 |
| Radium-228 4030 | Radionuclide | 5 of 7 results | Dec 13, 2011 | Jul 17, 2012 |
| Chloroform 2941 | Organic Chemical | 4 of 6 results | Jun 26, 2013 | Dec 29, 2025 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 | Organic Chemical | 4 of 6 results | Sep 22, 2009 | Dec 8, 2025 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 | Organic Chemical | 3 of 6 results | Jul 6, 2015 | Dec 8, 2025 |
| Bromodichloromethane 2943 | Organic Chemical | 3 of 6 results | Jun 26, 2013 | Dec 8, 2025 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 | Inorganic Chemical | 3 of 34 results | Mar 6, 2017 | Mar 10, 2021 |
| Nitrate 1040 | Inorganic Chemical | 3 of 34 results | Mar 6, 2017 | Mar 10, 2021 |
| Fluoride 1025 | Inorganic Chemical | 2 of 14 results | Mar 21, 2005 | Sep 6, 2022 |
| Sulfate 1055 | Inorganic Chemical | 2 of 2 results | Sep 29, 2003 | Mar 1, 2004 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 | Organic Chemical | 1 of 6 results | Dec 8, 2025 | Dec 8, 2025 |
| Bromoform 2942 | Organic Chemical | 1 of 6 results | Dec 8, 2025 | Dec 8, 2025 |
| Dibromochloromethane 2944 | Organic Chemical | 1 of 6 results | Dec 8, 2025 | Dec 8, 2025 |
| Chromium 1020 | Inorganic Chemical | 1 of 14 results | Mar 23, 2020 | Mar 23, 2020 |
| Radium-226 4020 | Radionuclide | 1 of 7 results | Dec 15, 2015 | Dec 15, 2015 |
| Selenium 1045 | Inorganic Chemical | 1 of 14 results | Mar 1, 2004 | Mar 1, 2004 |
No date range is applied: this list draws on every sample on record. Show the last two years only.
The most recent samples, result by result
The table below lists 151–160 of 193 samples, newest first — collected April 27, 2009 to August 2, 2011. The summary above covers all 193.
29 results from the 10 samples listed here: 8 detected, 21 not detected. Across the whole record it is 197 of 998. A sample is analysed for many analytes at once, so one sample appears on as many rows as it had results.
| Result | Analyte | Monitoring period |
|---|---|---|
|
||
| 0.0382 mg/l , sample collected Aug 2, 2011, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 2, 2011, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011 |
|
||
| 0.0614 mg/l , sample collected Aug 2, 2011, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011 |
| 0.0006 mg/l , sample collected Aug 2, 2011, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011 |
|
||
| 0.0954 mg/l , sample collected Aug 2, 2011, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 2, 2011, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011 |
|
||
| 0.0059 mg/l , sample collected Aug 2, 2011, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 2, 2011, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011 |
|
||
| Not detected below 0.1 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 23, 2011, sampling point TF080 | Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2011 |
| Not detected below 0.08 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 23, 2011, sampling point TF080 | Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2011 |
| Not detected below 0.02 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 23, 2011, sampling point TF080 | Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2011 |
|
||
| Not detected below 0.25 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 25, 2010, sampling point TF080 | Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| Not detected below 0.2 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 25, 2010, sampling point TF080 | Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| Not detected below 0.05 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 25, 2010, sampling point TF080 | Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| Not detected below 0.015 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 29, 2009, sampling point TF080 | Cyanide 1024 EPA method QC10204001X | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 22, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 22, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 22, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 22, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Sep 22, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 22, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| 0.001 mg/l , sample collected Sep 22, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 22, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 22, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 22, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| 0 mg/l This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. , sample collected Sep 22, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| Not detected below 0.25 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Apr 27, 2009, sampling point TF080 | Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009 |
| Not detected below 0.2 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Apr 27, 2009, sampling point TF080 | Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009 |
| Not detected below 0.05 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Apr 27, 2009, sampling point TF080 | Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009 |
-
- Collected
- Aug 2, 2011
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 110803-046PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0382 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Aug 2, 2011
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 110803-045PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0614 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0006 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Aug 2, 2011
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 110803-044PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0954 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Aug 2, 2011
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 110803-043PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0059 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Feb 23, 2011
- Sampling point
- TF080 Treatment Plant T080
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 110224-092NI
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2011
-
Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.1 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.08 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.02 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Aug 25, 2010
- Sampling point
- TF080 Treatment Plant T080
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100826-014NI
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.25 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.2 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.05 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Sep 29, 2009
- Sampling point
- TF080 Treatment Plant T080
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 090930-003CN
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Cyanide 1024 EPA method QC10204001X
- Result
- Not detected below 0.015 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Sep 22, 2009
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 090923-002TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
-
Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
- Collected
- Sep 22, 2009
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 090923-002HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
-
Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- 0.001 mg/l
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- 0 mg/l This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here.
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
- Collected
- Apr 27, 2009
- Sampling point
- TF080 Treatment Plant T080
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 090428-001NI
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009
-
Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.25 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.2 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.05 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
Routine (10).