This is a rebuild of Drinking Water Watch and not yet the official record. Use the agency’s current Drinking Water Watch for anything you need to rely on.
Chemical and radiological sample results
MS0380008 , Russell Utilities Inc
25 of the 57 analytes this system has been tested for have been detected at least once, across 246 samples on record.
The other 32 were tested for and never found. An analyte is counted here if any result on record measured it, so this covers the whole history and not the samples listed below.
Across all 246 samples on record, detections range from October 1, 2003 to May 20, 2026. These figures cover the whole record.
What counts as a non-detect is defined in the help: Less than Indicator. This system’s violations.
What has been detected, ever
Every analyte measured above its reporting level at any point in this system’s record, most often detected first. This is not limited to the samples listed below.
| Analyte | Kind | Detected in | First detected | Last detected |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper, Free 1022 | Inorganic Chemical | 122 of 123 results | Jul 8, 2004 | Aug 9, 2024 |
| Lead 1030 | Inorganic Chemical | 73 of 123 results | Jul 8, 2004 | Aug 7, 2024 |
| TTHM 2950 | Organic Chemical | 20 of 21 results | Jun 21, 2004 | May 20, 2026 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Organic Chemical | 18 of 21 results | Sep 21, 2009 | May 20, 2026 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 | Organic Chemical | 14 of 16 results | Sep 21, 2009 | May 20, 2026 |
| Chloroform 2941 | Organic Chemical | 13 of 16 results | Jul 8, 2015 | May 20, 2026 |
| Bromodichloromethane 2943 | Organic Chemical | 13 of 16 results | Jul 8, 2015 | May 20, 2026 |
| Dibromochloromethane 2944 | Organic Chemical | 13 of 16 results | Jul 8, 2015 | May 20, 2026 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 | Organic Chemical | 12 of 16 results | Jul 8, 2015 | May 20, 2026 |
| Barium 1010 | Inorganic Chemical | 10 of 10 results | Oct 1, 2003 | Feb 26, 2025 |
| Xylenes, Total 2955 | Organic Chemical | 9 of 37 results | May 3, 2004 | Sep 14, 2021 |
| Chromium 1020 | Inorganic Chemical | 5 of 10 results | Mar 1, 2004 | Feb 26, 2025 |
| Nickel 1036 | Inorganic Chemical | 5 of 10 results | Feb 27, 2006 | Feb 26, 2025 |
| Gross Alpha, Incl. Radon & U 4002 | Radionuclide | 5 of 5 results | Dec 12, 2011 | Jul 17, 2012 |
| Sodium 1052 | Inorganic Chemical | 3 of 3 results | Sep 24, 2019 | Feb 12, 2025 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 | Organic Chemical | 3 of 16 results | Jul 8, 2015 | Aug 14, 2019 |
| Bromoform 2942 | Organic Chemical | 2 of 16 results | Jun 5, 2024 | Sep 8, 2025 |
| Fluoride 1025 | Inorganic Chemical | 2 of 10 results | Mar 1, 2004 | Mar 27, 2005 |
| Sulfate 1055 | Inorganic Chemical | 2 of 2 results | Oct 1, 2003 | Mar 1, 2004 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 | Organic Chemical | 1 of 16 results | Aug 14, 2019 | Aug 14, 2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 | Organic Chemical | 1 of 16 results | Aug 28, 2018 | Aug 28, 2018 |
| Ethylbenzene 2992 | Organic Chemical | 1 of 37 results | Aug 20, 2015 | Aug 20, 2015 |
| Cadmium 1015 | Inorganic Chemical | 1 of 10 results | Mar 27, 2005 | Mar 27, 2005 |
| Selenium 1045 | Inorganic Chemical | 1 of 10 results | Mar 27, 2005 | Mar 27, 2005 |
| Dichloromethane 2964 | Organic Chemical | 1 of 37 results | Aug 9, 2004 | Aug 9, 2004 |
No date range is applied: this list draws on every sample on record. Show the last two years only.
The most recent samples, result by result
The table below lists 141–150 of 246 samples, newest first — collected September 21, 2009 to June 25, 2010. The summary above covers all 246.
22 results from the 10 samples listed here: 11 detected, 11 not detected. Across the whole record it is 350 of 1,425. A sample is analysed for many analytes at once, so one sample appears on as many rows as it had results.
| Result | Analyte | Monitoring period |
|---|---|---|
|
||
| 0.0253 mg/l , sample collected Jun 25, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 25, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| 0.0893 mg/l , sample collected Jun 25, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 25, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| 0.1261 mg/l , sample collected Jun 25, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| 0.0018 mg/l , sample collected Jun 25, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| 0.0112 mg/l , sample collected Jun 25, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 25, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| 0.0418 mg/l , sample collected Jun 24, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 24, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| 0.2927 mg/l , sample collected Jun 24, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 24, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| 0.5973 mg/l , sample collected Jun 24, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 24, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| 0.1294 mg/l , sample collected Jun 23, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| 0.0005 mg/l , sample collected Jun 23, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| Not detected below 0.015 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 28, 2009, sampling point TF080 | Cyanide 1024 EPA method QC10204001X | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 21, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 21, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 21, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 21, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Sep 21, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
-
- Collected
- Jun 25, 2010
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100628-018PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0253 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Jun 25, 2010
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100628-017PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0893 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Jun 25, 2010
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100628-015PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.1261 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0018 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Jun 25, 2010
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100628-011PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0112 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Jun 24, 2010
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100628-016PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0418 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Jun 24, 2010
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100628-014PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.2927 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Jun 24, 2010
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100628-012PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.5973 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Jun 23, 2010
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100628-013PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.1294 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0005 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Sep 28, 2009
- Sampling point
- TF080 Treatment Plant T080
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 090929-016CN
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Cyanide 1024 EPA method QC10204001X
- Result
- Not detected below 0.015 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Sep 21, 2009
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 090922-018TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
-
Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Routine (10).