Skip to main content
Alpha

This is a rebuild of Drinking Water Watch and not yet the official record. Use the agency’s current Drinking Water Watch for anything you need to rely on.

Chemical and radiological sample results

MS0410011 , Town of Plantersville

18 of the 58 analytes this system has been tested for have been detected at least once, across 283 samples on record.

The other 40 were tested for and never found. An analyte is counted here if any result on record measured it, so this covers the whole history and not the samples listed below.

Across all 283 samples on record, detections range from October 1, 2003 to April 9, 2025. These figures cover the whole record.

What counts as a non-detect is defined in the help: Less than Indicator. This system’s violations.

What has been detected, ever

Every analyte measured above its reporting level at any point in this system’s record, most often detected first. This is not limited to the samples listed below.

Every analyte ever detected for Town of Plantersville, with how many results found it and when it was first and last detected. Covers the whole record, not only the samples listed below.
Analyte Kind Detected in First detected Last detected
Copper, Free 1022 Inorganic Chemical 60 of 60 results Jul 30, 2007 Aug 28, 2023
Barium 1010 Inorganic Chemical 30 of 30 results Oct 1, 2003 Mar 11, 2025
Fluoride 1025 Inorganic Chemical 19 of 30 results Oct 1, 2003 Mar 11, 2025
Lead 1030 Inorganic Chemical 18 of 60 results Jul 30, 2007 Aug 28, 2023
Nickel 1036 Inorganic Chemical 16 of 30 results Oct 1, 2003 Mar 11, 2025
Gross Alpha, Incl. Radon & U 4002 Radionuclide 15 of 15 results Mar 12, 2012 Oct 5, 2012
Chromium 1020 Inorganic Chemical 11 of 30 results Oct 1, 2003 Apr 22, 2015
TTHM 2950 Organic Chemical 9 of 23 results Aug 20, 2007 Apr 9, 2025
Sodium 1052 Inorganic Chemical 9 of 9 results Sep 19, 2019 Feb 18, 2025
Sulfate 1055 Inorganic Chemical 6 of 6 results Oct 1, 2003 Mar 1, 2004
Dibromochloromethane 2944 Organic Chemical 5 of 17 results Sep 11, 2018 Nov 7, 2024
Selenium 1045 Inorganic Chemical 5 of 30 results Oct 1, 2003 Mar 1, 2006
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 Organic Chemical 4 of 23 results Sep 28, 2009 Sep 22, 2021
Bromoform 2942 Organic Chemical 3 of 17 results Jul 25, 2013 Aug 12, 2019
Nitrite 1041 Inorganic Chemical 1 of 66 results Mar 10, 2021 Mar 10, 2021
Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 Organic Chemical 1 of 17 results Sep 15, 2020 Sep 15, 2020
Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 Organic Chemical 1 of 17 results Aug 12, 2019 Aug 12, 2019
Dichloromethane 2964 Organic Chemical 1 of 21 results Aug 12, 2004 Aug 12, 2004

No date range is applied: this list draws on every sample on record. Show the last two years only.

The most recent samples, result by result

The table below lists 201–210 of 283 samples, newest first — collected May 4, 2009 to March 9, 2011. The summary above covers all 283.

29 results from the 10 samples listed here: 2 detected, 27 not detected. Across the whole record it is 214 of 1,409. A sample is analysed for many analytes at once, so one sample appears on as many rows as it had results.

Chemical and radiological sample results for Town of Plantersville, every result from 201 to 210 of 283 samples shown, newest first. Not detected means the amount was below the level the laboratory can reliably report, which is given beside it.
Result Analyte Monitoring period
Collected
Mar 9, 2011
Sampling point
TF101 Treatment Plant T101
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
110310-037NI
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
Not detected below 0.1 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Mar 9, 2011, sampling point TF101 Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2 Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2011
Not detected below 0.08 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Mar 9, 2011, sampling point TF101 Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2 Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2011
Not detected below 0.02 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Mar 9, 2011, sampling point TF101 Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2 Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2011
Collected
Aug 11, 2010
Sampling point
TF103 Treatment Plant T103
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
100812-074NI
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
Not detected below 0.25 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 11, 2010, sampling point TF103 Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2 Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.2 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 11, 2010, sampling point TF103 Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2 Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.05 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 11, 2010, sampling point TF103 Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2 Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010
Collected
Aug 11, 2010
Sampling point
TF102 Treatment Plant T102
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
100812-072NI
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
Not detected below 0.25 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 11, 2010, sampling point TF102 Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2 Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.2 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 11, 2010, sampling point TF102 Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2 Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.05 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 11, 2010, sampling point TF102 Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2 Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010
Collected
Aug 11, 2010
Sampling point
TF101 Treatment Plant T101
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
100812-073NI
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
Not detected below 0.25 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 11, 2010, sampling point TF101 Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2 Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.2 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 11, 2010, sampling point TF101 Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2 Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.05 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 11, 2010, sampling point TF101 Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2 Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010
Collected
Dec 14, 2009
Sampling point
TF101 Treatment Plant T101
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
091215-027CN
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
Not detected below 15 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Dec 14, 2009, sampling point TF101 Cyanide 1024 EPA method QC10204001X Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Collected
Dec 14, 2009
Sampling point
TF102 Treatment Plant T102
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
091215-022CN
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
Not detected below 15 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Dec 14, 2009, sampling point TF102 Cyanide 1024 EPA method QC10204001X Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Collected
Dec 14, 2009
Sampling point
TF103 Treatment Plant T103
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
091215-020CN
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
Not detected below 15 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Dec 14, 2009, sampling point TF103 Cyanide 1024 EPA method QC10204001X Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Collected
Sep 28, 2009
Sampling point
MRT000 Max. Res. Time
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
090929-020HA
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 28, 2009, sampling point MRT000 Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 28, 2009, sampling point MRT000 Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 28, 2009, sampling point MRT000 Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 28, 2009, sampling point MRT000 Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 28, 2009, sampling point MRT000 Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Sep 28, 2009, sampling point MRT000 Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Collected
Sep 28, 2009
Sampling point
MRT000 Max. Res. Time
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
090929-016TH
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 28, 2009, sampling point MRT000 Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 28, 2009, sampling point MRT000 Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 28, 2009, sampling point MRT000 Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 28, 2009, sampling point MRT000 Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Sep 28, 2009, sampling point MRT000 TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Collected
May 4, 2009
Sampling point
TF101 Treatment Plant T101
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
090505-028NI
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
Not detected below 0.25 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected May 4, 2009, sampling point TF101 Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2 Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009
Not detected below 0.2 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected May 4, 2009, sampling point TF101 Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2 Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009
Not detected below 0.05 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected May 4, 2009, sampling point TF101 Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2 Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009

Routine (10).