This is a rebuild of Drinking Water Watch and not yet the official record. Use the agency’s current Drinking Water Watch for anything you need to rely on.
Chemical and radiological sample results
MS0410012 , Town of Saltillo
24 of the 57 analytes this system has been tested for have been detected at least once, across 750 samples on record.
An analyte is counted here if any result on record measured it, so this covers the whole history and not the samples listed below.
Across all 750 samples on record, detections range from October 1, 2003 to December 15, 2025. These figures cover the whole record.
What counts as a non-detect is defined in the help: Less than Indicator. This system’s violations.
What has been detected, ever
Every analyte measured above its reporting level at any point in this system’s record, most often detected first. This is not limited to the samples listed below.
| Analyte | Kind | Detected in | First detected | Last detected |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper, Free 1022 | Inorganic Chemical | 478 of 478 results | Aug 30, 2007 | Sep 9, 2025 |
| Lead 1030 | Inorganic Chemical | 164 of 478 results | Aug 30, 2007 | Sep 9, 2025 |
| TTHM 2950 | Organic Chemical | 53 of 60 results | Jun 28, 2004 | Dec 15, 2025 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Organic Chemical | 44 of 58 results | Oct 12, 2005 | Oct 27, 2025 |
| Barium 1010 | Inorganic Chemical | 26 of 26 results | Oct 1, 2003 | Jul 9, 2019 |
| Bromoform 2942 | Organic Chemical | 18 of 30 results | May 17, 2006 | May 28, 2019 |
| Chromium 1020 | Inorganic Chemical | 17 of 26 results | Oct 1, 2003 | Jul 9, 2019 |
| Nickel 1036 | Inorganic Chemical | 16 of 26 results | Oct 1, 2003 | Jul 9, 2019 |
| Fluoride 1025 | Inorganic Chemical | 14 of 26 results | Oct 1, 2003 | Jul 9, 2019 |
| Gross Alpha Particle Activity 4109 | Radionuclide | 12 of 12 results | Sep 19, 2011 | Apr 3, 2012 |
| Dibromochloromethane 2944 | Organic Chemical | 10 of 30 results | Aug 14, 2006 | Dec 15, 2025 |
| Selenium 1045 | Inorganic Chemical | 8 of 26 results | Oct 1, 2003 | Feb 28, 2006 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 | Organic Chemical | 5 of 23 results | Jun 9, 2014 | Dec 14, 2020 |
| Sodium 1052 | Inorganic Chemical | 5 of 5 results | Sep 26, 2019 | Sep 26, 2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 | Organic Chemical | 5 of 23 results | Dec 14, 2009 | Jun 27, 2018 |
| Sulfate 1055 | Inorganic Chemical | 5 of 6 results | Oct 1, 2003 | Mar 1, 2004 |
| Arsenic 1005 | Inorganic Chemical | 4 of 26 results | Mar 28, 2005 | Jul 9, 2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane 2943 | Organic Chemical | 3 of 30 results | Jun 27, 2018 | Dec 15, 2025 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 | Organic Chemical | 3 of 23 results | Jun 9, 2014 | Oct 27, 2025 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 | Organic Chemical | 3 of 23 results | Jun 9, 2014 | Oct 27, 2025 |
| Chloroform 2941 | Organic Chemical | 2 of 30 results | Dec 7, 2020 | Dec 15, 2025 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 | Organic Chemical | 2 of 23 results | Sep 14, 2009 | Jun 9, 2014 |
| Xylenes, Total 2955 | Organic Chemical | 1 of 27 results | Nov 7, 2019 | Nov 7, 2019 |
| Ethylbenzene 2992 | Organic Chemical | 1 of 27 results | Nov 7, 2019 | Nov 7, 2019 |
No date range is applied: this list draws on every sample on record. Show the last two years only.
The most recent samples, result by result
The table below lists 621–630 of 750 samples, newest first — collected March 15, 2010 to July 20, 2010. The summary above covers all 750.
24 results from the 10 samples listed here: 15 detected, 9 not detected. Across the whole record it is 899 of 2,408. A sample is analysed for many analytes at once, so one sample appears on as many rows as it had results.
| Result | Analyte | Monitoring period |
|---|---|---|
|
||
| 0.1462 mg/l , sample collected Jul 20, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 20, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| 0.0686 mg/l , sample collected Jul 20, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 20, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| 0.2001 mg/l , sample collected Jul 20, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 20, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| 0.0205 mg/l , sample collected Jul 20, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| 0.0017 mg/l , sample collected Jul 20, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| 0.0027 mg/l , sample collected Jul 20, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| 0.0008 mg/l , sample collected Jul 20, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| 0.0039 mg/l , sample collected Jul 20, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| 0.0024 mg/l , sample collected Jul 20, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| 0.0335 mg/l , sample collected Jul 20, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 20, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| 0.2218 mg/l , sample collected Jul 20, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| 0.0007 mg/l , sample collected Jul 20, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| 0.0691 mg/l , sample collected Jul 20, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| 0.0016 mg/l , sample collected Jul 20, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Mar 15, 2010, sampling point SM2 | Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Mar 15, 2010, sampling point SM2 | Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Mar 15, 2010, sampling point SM2 | Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Mar 15, 2010, sampling point SM2 | Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Mar 15, 2010, sampling point SM2 | Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Mar 15, 2010, sampling point SM2 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Not recorded |
-
- Collected
- Jul 20, 2010
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100721-094PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.1462 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Jul 20, 2010
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100721-093PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0686 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Jul 20, 2010
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100721-092PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.2001 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Jul 20, 2010
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100721-091PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0205 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0017 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Jul 20, 2010
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100721-090PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0027 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0008 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Jul 20, 2010
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100721-089PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0039 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0024 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Jul 20, 2010
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100721-088PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0335 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Jul 20, 2010
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100721-087PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.2218 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0007 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Jul 20, 2010
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100721-086PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0691 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0016 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Mar 15, 2010
- Sampling point
- SM2 SM2
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100316-028HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
Routine (10).