This is a rebuild of Drinking Water Watch and not yet the official record. Use the agency’s current Drinking Water Watch for anything you need to rely on.
TTHM results
MS0410024 , North Lee W/A #1-Barnes Crosng
21 samples have been analysed for TTHM at North Lee W/A #1-Barnes Crosng.
This is one analyte out of the system’s whole record. For what has ever been detected here, and when, see all chemical and radiological results; for everything the system is tested for, see the analyte list.
What counts as a non-detect is defined in the help: Less than Indicator. This system’s violations.
No date range is applied: this list draws on every sample on record. Show the last two years only.
Every TTHM result
The table below lists 11–20 of 21 samples, newest first — collected September 27, 2007 to March 6, 2024.
10 TTHM results from the 10 samples listed here: 5 detected, 5 not detected. Those samples also carried 34 results for other analytes, which are on the full results page.
Units in this table
TTHM is recorded on this page in ug/l and mg/l. 1 mg/l = 1,000 ug/l.
We withheld the location of 1 sampling point below. The location on record identifies a private home, and we do not publish those. That is our decision, not the agency’s. The sampling point, its type and every result taken there are published unchanged.
| Result | Analyte | Monitoring period |
|---|---|---|
|
||
| Not detected below 0.5 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Mar 6, 2024 08:50, sampling point SM1 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Jan 1, 2024 – Mar 31, 2024 |
|
||
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 16, 2023 12:10, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Jan 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2023 |
|
||
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected May 23, 2022 09:50, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
|
||
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 20, 2021 09:10, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Jan 1, 2021 – Dec 31, 2021 |
|
||
| 4.72 ug/l , sample collected Sep 15, 2020, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 | Jan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2020 |
|
||
| 4.23 ug/l , sample collected Aug 13, 2019 12:45, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 | Jan 1, 2019 – Dec 31, 2019 |
|
||
| 2.6 ug/l , sample collected Sep 11, 2018 01:15, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 | Jan 1, 2017 – Dec 31, 2019 |
|
||
| Not detected below 4 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Nov 2, 2011 04:05, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013 |
|
||
| 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Sep 30, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Sep 27, 2007, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007 |
-
- Collected
- Mar 6, 2024 08:50
- Sampling point
- SM1 Location withheld
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 810-96383-1
- Laboratory
- Eurofins Eaton Analytical South Bend in
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2024 – Mar 31, 2024
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.5 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Aug 16, 2023 12:10
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- TH-230817-009
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2023 – Dec 31, 2023
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- May 23, 2022 09:50
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- TH-220524-030
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Sep 20, 2021 09:10
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- TH-210921-008
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2021 – Dec 31, 2021
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Sep 15, 2020
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 200916-010TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2020
-
TTHM 2950
- Result
- 4.72 ug/l
-
- Collected
- Aug 13, 2019 12:45
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 190814-012TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2019 – Dec 31, 2019
-
TTHM 2950
- Result
- 4.23 ug/l
-
- Collected
- Sep 11, 2018 01:15
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 180912-010TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2017 – Dec 31, 2019
-
TTHM 2950
- Result
- 2.6 ug/l
-
- Collected
- Nov 2, 2011 04:05
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 111103-007TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2013
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 4 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Sep 30, 2009
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 091001-003TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
-
- Collected
- Sep 27, 2007
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 070928-005TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
Routine (10).