Chemical and radiological sample results

MS0410032 ·, Mooreville-Richmond W/A #2

What has been detected, ever

Every analyte measured above its reporting level at any point in this system’s record, most often detected first. This is not limited to the samples listed below.

Scroll the table sideways for the dates.

No date range is applied: this list draws on every sample on record. Show the last two years only.

The most recent samples, result by result

The table below lists 311–320 of 496 samples, newest first — collected July 1, 2009 to September 28, 2009. The summary above covers all 496.

27 results from the 10 samples listed here: 13 detected, 14 not detected. Across the whole record it is 513 of 2,672. A sample is analysed for many analytes at once, so one sample appears on as many rows as it had results.

• Collected

  Sep 28, 2009

  Sampling point

  MRT000 Max. Res. Time

  Sample type

  Routine

  Lab sample

  090929-013HA

  Laboratory

  MSDH Lab

  • Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Not recorded

  • Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Not recorded

  • Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Not recorded

  • Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Not recorded

  • Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Not recorded

  • Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456

    Result

    0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.

    Monitoring period

    Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010

• Collected

  Sep 28, 2009

  Sampling point

  MRT000 Max. Res. Time

  Sample type

  Routine

  Lab sample

  090929-013TH

  Laboratory

  MSDH Lab

  • Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2

    Result

    Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Not recorded

  • Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2

    Result

    Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Not recorded

  • Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2

    Result

    Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Not recorded

  • Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2

    Result

    Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Not recorded

  • TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2

    Result

    0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.

    Monitoring period

    Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010

• Collected

  Jul 1, 2009

  Sampling point

  DS000 Distribution

  Sample type

  Routine

  Lab sample

  090702-065PB

  Laboratory

  MSDH Lab

  Monitoring period

  Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009

  • Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    0.0636 mg/l

  • Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

• Collected

  Jul 1, 2009

  Sampling point

  DS000 Distribution

  Sample type

  Routine

  Lab sample

  090702-064PB

  Laboratory

  MSDH Lab

  Monitoring period

  Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009

  • Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    0.1083 mg/l

  • Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

• Collected

  Jul 1, 2009

  Sampling point

  DS000 Distribution

  Sample type

  Routine

  Lab sample

  090702-057PB

  Laboratory

  MSDH Lab

  Monitoring period

  Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009

  • Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    0.0855 mg/l

  • Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

• Collected

  Jul 1, 2009

  Sampling point

  DS000 Distribution

  Sample type

  Routine

  Lab sample

  090702-056PB

  Laboratory

  MSDH Lab

  Monitoring period

  Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009

  • Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    0.2069 mg/l

  • Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

• Collected

  Jul 1, 2009

  Sampling point

  DS000 Distribution

  Sample type

  Routine

  Lab sample

  090702-025PB

  Laboratory

  MSDH Lab

  Monitoring period

  Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009

  • Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    0.0756 mg/l

  • Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    0.0006 mg/l

• Collected

  Jul 1, 2009

  Sampling point

  DS000 Distribution

  Sample type

  Routine

  Lab sample

  090702-024PB

  Laboratory

  MSDH Lab

  Monitoring period

  Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009

  • Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    0.2993 mg/l

  • Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    0.001 mg/l

• Collected

  Jul 1, 2009

  Sampling point

  DS000 Distribution

  Sample type

  Routine

  Lab sample

  090702-023PB

  Laboratory

  MSDH Lab

  Monitoring period

  Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009

  • Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    0.1095 mg/l

  • Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

• Collected

  Jul 1, 2009

  Sampling point

  DS000 Distribution

  Sample type

  Routine

  Lab sample

  090702-022PB

  Laboratory

  MSDH Lab

  Monitoring period

  Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009

  • Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    0.1374 mg/l

  • Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    0.0005 mg/l

Routine (10).