This is a rebuild of Drinking Water Watch and not yet the official record. Use the agency’s current Drinking Water Watch for anything you need to rely on.
Chemical and radiological sample results
MS0430031 , Lincoln Rural W/A-Old Red Star
21 of the 57 analytes this system has been tested for have been detected at least once, across 220 samples on record.
The other 36 were tested for and never found. An analyte is counted here if any result on record measured it, so this covers the whole history and not the samples listed below.
Across all 220 samples on record, detections range from October 6, 2003 to September 24, 2025. These figures cover the whole record.
What counts as a non-detect is defined in the help: Less than Indicator. This system’s violations.
What has been detected, ever
Every analyte measured above its reporting level at any point in this system’s record, most often detected first. This is not limited to the samples listed below.
| Analyte | Kind | Detected in | First detected | Last detected |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper, Free 1022 | Inorganic Chemical | 120 of 120 results | Nov 3, 2004 | Aug 22, 2024 |
| Lead 1030 | Inorganic Chemical | 50 of 120 results | Nov 3, 2004 | Aug 22, 2024 |
| Barium 1010 | Inorganic Chemical | 10 of 10 results | Oct 6, 2003 | Mar 10, 2025 |
| Fluoride 1025 | Inorganic Chemical | 7 of 10 results | Oct 6, 2003 | Mar 10, 2025 |
| Nickel 1036 | Inorganic Chemical | 7 of 10 results | Oct 6, 2003 | Mar 10, 2025 |
| TTHM 2950 | Organic Chemical | 5 of 22 results | Aug 21, 2007 | Sep 24, 2025 |
| Gross Alpha, Incl. Radon & U 4002 | Radionuclide | 5 of 5 results | Dec 14, 2011 | Jul 18, 2012 |
| Chloroform 2941 | Organic Chemical | 3 of 17 results | Jul 23, 2013 | Sep 24, 2025 |
| Sodium 1052 | Inorganic Chemical | 3 of 3 results | Sep 18, 2019 | Feb 12, 2025 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Organic Chemical | 3 of 22 results | Aug 21, 2007 | Jul 23, 2013 |
| Bromodichloromethane 2943 | Organic Chemical | 2 of 17 results | Jul 23, 2013 | Sep 24, 2025 |
| Dibromochloromethane 2944 | Organic Chemical | 2 of 17 results | Jul 23, 2013 | Sep 24, 2025 |
| Cadmium 1015 | Inorganic Chemical | 2 of 10 results | Oct 6, 2003 | Mar 8, 2004 |
| Sulfate 1055 | Inorganic Chemical | 2 of 2 results | Oct 6, 2003 | Mar 8, 2004 |
| Chromium 1020 | Inorganic Chemical | 1 of 10 results | Feb 29, 2016 | Feb 29, 2016 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 | Organic Chemical | 1 of 16 results | Jul 23, 2013 | Jul 23, 2013 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 | Organic Chemical | 1 of 16 results | Jul 23, 2013 | Jul 23, 2013 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 | Organic Chemical | 1 of 16 results | Jul 23, 2013 | Jul 23, 2013 |
| Arsenic 1005 | Inorganic Chemical | 1 of 10 results | Feb 25, 2009 | Feb 25, 2009 |
| Selenium 1045 | Inorganic Chemical | 1 of 10 results | Feb 25, 2009 | Feb 25, 2009 |
| Dichloromethane 2964 | Organic Chemical | 1 of 11 results | Aug 10, 2004 | Aug 10, 2004 |
No date range is applied: this list draws on every sample on record. Show the last two years only.
The most recent samples, result by result
The table below lists 121–130 of 220 samples, newest first — collected September 29, 2009 to June 22, 2010. The summary above covers all 220.
26 results from the 10 samples listed here: 11 detected, 15 not detected. Across the whole record it is 228 of 881. A sample is analysed for many analytes at once, so one sample appears on as many rows as it had results.
| Result | Analyte | Monitoring period |
|---|---|---|
|
||
| 0.1078 mg/l , sample collected Jun 22, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 22, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| 0.0112 mg/l , sample collected Jun 22, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 22, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| 0.0507 mg/l , sample collected Jun 22, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| 0.0006 mg/l , sample collected Jun 22, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| 0.0075 mg/l , sample collected Jun 21, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 21, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| 0.0273 mg/l , sample collected Jun 21, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| 0.0033 mg/l , sample collected Jun 21, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| 0.0124 mg/l , sample collected Jun 21, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 21, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| 0.0077 mg/l , sample collected Jun 21, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 21, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| Not detected below 15 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Dec 28, 2009, sampling point TF080 | Cyanide 1024 EPA method QC10204001X | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 29, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 29, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 29, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 29, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 29, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Sep 29, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 29, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 29, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 29, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 29, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Sep 29, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
-
- Collected
- Jun 22, 2010
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100623-055PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.1078 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Jun 22, 2010
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100623-051PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0112 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Jun 22, 2010
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100623-046PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0507 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0006 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Jun 21, 2010
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100623-054PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0075 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Jun 21, 2010
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100623-053PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0273 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0033 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Jun 21, 2010
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100623-052PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0124 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Jun 21, 2010
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100623-047PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0077 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Dec 28, 2009
- Sampling point
- TF080 Treatment Plant T080
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 091229-021CN
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Cyanide 1024 EPA method QC10204001X
- Result
- Not detected below 15 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Sep 29, 2009
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 090930-006HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
-
Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
- Collected
- Sep 29, 2009
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 090930-006TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
-
Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Routine (10).