This is a rebuild of Drinking Water Watch and not yet the official record. Use the agency’s current Drinking Water Watch for anything you need to rely on.
Chemical and radiological sample results
MS0460005 , Foxworth Water & Sewerage Assn
28 of the 57 analytes this system has been tested for have been detected at least once, across 275 samples on record.
The other 29 were tested for and never found. An analyte is counted here if any result on record measured it, so this covers the whole history and not the samples listed below.
Across all 275 samples on record, detections range from November 24, 2003 to August 5, 2026. These figures cover the whole record.
What counts as a non-detect is defined in the help: Less than Indicator. This system’s violations.
What has been detected, ever
Every analyte measured above its reporting level at any point in this system’s record, most often detected first. This is not limited to the samples listed below.
| Analyte | Kind | Detected in | First detected | Last detected |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper, Free 1022 | Inorganic Chemical | 71 of 71 results | Aug 9, 2007 | Aug 5, 2026 |
| Lead 1030 | Inorganic Chemical | 48 of 71 results | Aug 9, 2007 | Aug 5, 2026 |
| Barium 1010 | Inorganic Chemical | 22 of 24 results | Mar 8, 2004 | Mar 12, 2025 |
| Fluoride 1025 | Inorganic Chemical | 21 of 24 results | Nov 24, 2003 | Mar 12, 2025 |
| Chromium 1020 | Inorganic Chemical | 13 of 24 results | Mar 8, 2004 | Mar 12, 2025 |
| TTHM 2950 | Organic Chemical | 11 of 19 results | Jul 12, 2004 | Aug 15, 2024 |
| Gross Alpha, Incl. Radon & U 4002 | Radionuclide | 10 of 11 results | Dec 15, 2011 | Jul 12, 2012 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Organic Chemical | 9 of 20 results | Jun 10, 2010 | Aug 15, 2024 |
| Nickel 1036 | Inorganic Chemical | 8 of 24 results | Mar 8, 2004 | Mar 12, 2025 |
| Chloroform 2941 | Organic Chemical | 8 of 14 results | Aug 23, 2007 | Aug 15, 2024 |
| Nitrate 1040 | Inorganic Chemical | 7 of 61 results | May 13, 2009 | Jul 7, 2026 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 | Inorganic Chemical | 6 of 61 results | Sep 8, 2010 | Jul 7, 2026 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 | Organic Chemical | 6 of 15 results | Aug 23, 2007 | Aug 15, 2024 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 | Organic Chemical | 6 of 15 results | Aug 23, 2007 | Aug 15, 2024 |
| Bromodichloromethane 2943 | Organic Chemical | 6 of 14 results | Aug 23, 2007 | Aug 15, 2024 |
| Dibromochloromethane 2944 | Organic Chemical | 6 of 14 results | Aug 23, 2007 | Aug 15, 2024 |
| Combined Radium (-226 & -228) 4010 | Radionuclide | 6 of 15 results | Dec 15, 2011 | Sep 17, 2019 |
| Radium-226 4020 | Radionuclide | 6 of 15 results | Dec 15, 2011 | Sep 17, 2019 |
| Sodium 1052 | Inorganic Chemical | 5 of 5 results | Mar 2, 2022 | Feb 26, 2025 |
| Gross Alpha Particle Activity 4109 | Radionuclide | 4 of 4 results | Jun 21, 2012 | Jan 23, 2013 |
| Sulfate 1055 | Inorganic Chemical | 4 of 4 results | Nov 24, 2003 | Mar 8, 2004 |
| Arsenic 1005 | Inorganic Chemical | 2 of 24 results | Nov 24, 2003 | Nov 24, 2003 |
| Selenium 1045 | Inorganic Chemical | 2 of 24 results | Nov 24, 2003 | Nov 24, 2003 |
| Xylenes, Total 2955 | Organic Chemical | 1 of 31 results | May 20, 2020 | May 20, 2020 |
| Radium-228 4030 | Radionuclide | 1 of 15 results | Sep 17, 2019 | Sep 17, 2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 | Organic Chemical | 1 of 15 results | Sep 4, 2019 | Sep 4, 2019 |
| Nitrite 1041 | Inorganic Chemical | 1 of 61 results | May 13, 2009 | May 13, 2009 |
| Cyanide 1024 | Inorganic Chemical | 1 of 25 results | Apr 13, 2005 | Apr 13, 2005 |
No date range is applied: this list draws on every sample on record. Show the last two years only.
The most recent samples, result by result
The table below lists 211–220 of 275 samples, newest first — collected June 10, 2010 to August 12, 2011. The summary above covers all 275.
31 results from the 10 samples listed here: 13 detected, 18 not detected. Across the whole record it is 292 of 1,517. A sample is analysed for many analytes at once, so one sample appears on as many rows as it had results.
| Result | Analyte | Monitoring period |
|---|---|---|
|
||
| 0.1041 mg/l , sample collected Aug 12, 2011, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011 |
| 0.0006 mg/l , sample collected Aug 12, 2011, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011 |
|
||
| 0.0442 mg/l , sample collected Aug 12, 2011, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011 |
| 0.001 mg/l , sample collected Aug 12, 2011, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011 |
|
||
| 0.1182 mg/l , sample collected Aug 12, 2011, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011 |
| 0.001 mg/l , sample collected Aug 12, 2011, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011 |
|
||
| 0.0796 mg/l , sample collected Aug 12, 2011, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 12, 2011, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011 |
|
||
| Not detected below 0.1 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Mar 7, 2011, sampling point TF102 | Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2011 |
| Not detected below 0.08 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Mar 7, 2011, sampling point TF102 | Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2011 |
| Not detected below 0.02 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Mar 7, 2011, sampling point TF102 | Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2011 |
|
||
| Not detected below 0.1 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Mar 7, 2011, sampling point TF101 | Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2011 |
| Not detected below 0.08 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Mar 7, 2011, sampling point TF101 | Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2011 |
| Not detected below 0.02 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Mar 7, 2011, sampling point TF101 | Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2011 |
|
||
| 0.47 mg/l , sample collected Sep 8, 2010, sampling point TF101 | Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| 0.45 mg/l , sample collected Sep 8, 2010, sampling point TF101 | Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| Not detected below 0.05 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 8, 2010, sampling point TF101 | Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| 0.45 mg/l , sample collected Sep 8, 2010, sampling point TF102 | Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| 0.45 mg/l , sample collected Sep 8, 2010, sampling point TF102 | Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| Not detected below 0.05 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 8, 2010, sampling point TF102 | Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 10, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 10, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 10, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 10, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Jun 10, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 10, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 10, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 10, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 10, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 10, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Jun 10, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
-
- Collected
- Aug 12, 2011
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 110812-009PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.1041 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0006 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Aug 12, 2011
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 110812-008PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0442 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.001 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Aug 12, 2011
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 110812-007PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.1182 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.001 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Aug 12, 2011
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 110812-006PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0796 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Mar 7, 2011
- Sampling point
- TF102 Treatment Plant T102
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 110308-047NI
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2011
-
Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.1 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.08 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.02 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Mar 7, 2011
- Sampling point
- TF101 Treatment Plant T101
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 110308-046NI
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2011
-
Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.1 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.08 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.02 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Sep 8, 2010
- Sampling point
- TF101 Treatment Plant T101
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100909-003NI
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- 0.47 mg/l
-
Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- 0.45 mg/l
-
Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.05 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Sep 8, 2010
- Sampling point
- TF102 Treatment Plant T102
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100909-001NI
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- 0.45 mg/l
-
Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- 0.45 mg/l
-
Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.05 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Jun 10, 2010
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100611-005TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
-
Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
- Collected
- Jun 10, 2010
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100611-005HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
-
Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Routine (10).