This is a rebuild of Drinking Water Watch and not yet the official record. Use the agency’s current Drinking Water Watch for anything you need to rely on.
Chemical and radiological sample results
MS0460009 , Lampton Water Association
17 of the 56 analytes this system has been tested for have been detected at least once, across 196 samples on record.
The other 39 were tested for and never found. An analyte is counted here if any result on record measured it, so this covers the whole history and not the samples listed below.
Across all 196 samples on record, detections range from October 8, 2003 to August 5, 2026. These figures cover the whole record.
What counts as a non-detect is defined in the help: Less than Indicator. This system’s violations.
What has been detected, ever
Every analyte measured above its reporting level at any point in this system’s record, most often detected first. This is not limited to the samples listed below.
| Analyte | Kind | Detected in | First detected | Last detected |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper, Free 1022 | Inorganic Chemical | 82 of 82 results | Aug 17, 2004 | Sep 26, 2023 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 | Inorganic Chemical | 26 of 26 results | May 24, 2004 | Jul 7, 2026 |
| Nitrate 1040 | Inorganic Chemical | 26 of 26 results | May 24, 2004 | Jul 7, 2026 |
| Lead 1030 | Inorganic Chemical | 14 of 82 results | Aug 17, 2004 | Sep 5, 2023 |
| Barium 1010 | Inorganic Chemical | 11 of 11 results | Oct 8, 2003 | Feb 6, 2024 |
| Chromium 1020 | Inorganic Chemical | 6 of 11 results | Oct 8, 2003 | Feb 6, 2024 |
| Fluoride 1025 | Inorganic Chemical | 5 of 11 results | Mar 2, 2016 | Oct 31, 2023 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Organic Chemical | 5 of 20 results | Aug 21, 2007 | May 3, 2023 |
| Gross Alpha, Incl. Radon & U 4002 | Radionuclide | 5 of 5 results | Dec 12, 2011 | Jul 17, 2012 |
| Combined Radium (-226 & -228) 4010 | Radionuclide | 5 of 5 results | Dec 12, 2011 | Jul 17, 2012 |
| Radium-226 4020 | Radionuclide | 5 of 5 results | Dec 12, 2011 | Jul 17, 2012 |
| TTHM 2950 | Organic Chemical | 4 of 20 results | Aug 21, 2007 | Nov 20, 2024 |
| Chloroform 2941 | Organic Chemical | 2 of 15 results | Aug 19, 2024 | Nov 20, 2024 |
| Bromodichloromethane 2943 | Organic Chemical | 2 of 15 results | Aug 19, 2024 | Nov 20, 2024 |
| Sodium 1052 | Inorganic Chemical | 1 of 1 result | Aug 5, 2026 | Aug 5, 2026 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 | Organic Chemical | 1 of 14 results | Aug 20, 2019 | Aug 20, 2019 |
| Nickel 1036 | Inorganic Chemical | 1 of 11 results | Jan 11, 2010 | Jan 11, 2010 |
No date range is applied: this list draws on every sample on record. Show the last two years only.
The most recent samples, result by result
The table below lists 161–170 of 196 samples, newest first — collected August 21, 2007 to August 13, 2008. The summary above covers all 196.
24 results from the 10 samples listed here: 13 detected, 11 not detected. Across the whole record it is 201 of 956. A sample is analysed for many analytes at once, so one sample appears on as many rows as it had results.
| Result | Analyte | Monitoring period |
|---|---|---|
|
||
| 0.0019 mg/l , sample collected Aug 13, 2008, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 13, 2008, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
|
||
| 0.0035 mg/l , sample collected Aug 13, 2008, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 13, 2008, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
|
||
| 0.0079 mg/l , sample collected Aug 13, 2008, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 13, 2008, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
|
||
| 0.0057 mg/l , sample collected Aug 13, 2008, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
| 0.0024 mg/l , sample collected Aug 13, 2008, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
|
||
| 0.0042 mg/l , sample collected Aug 13, 2008, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 13, 2008, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
|
||
| 0.0037 mg/l , sample collected Aug 13, 2008, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 13, 2008, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
|
||
| 0.21 mg/l , sample collected Jul 7, 2008, sampling point TF080 | Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008 |
| 0.2 mg/l , sample collected Jul 7, 2008, sampling point TF080 | Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008 |
| Not detected below 0.02 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 7, 2008, sampling point TF080 | Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008 |
|
||
| 0.31 mg/l , sample collected Nov 13, 2007, sampling point TF080 | Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2007 – Dec 31, 2007 |
| 0.31 mg/l , sample collected Nov 13, 2007, sampling point TF080 | Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2007 – Dec 31, 2007 |
| Not detected below 0.02 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Nov 13, 2007, sampling point TF080 | Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2007 – Dec 31, 2007 |
|
||
| 0.0001 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Aug 21, 2007, sampling point MRT000 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 EPA method 552.2 | Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007 |
|
||
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 21, 2007, sampling point MRT000 | Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 21, 2007, sampling point MRT000 | Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 21, 2007, sampling point MRT000 | Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 21, 2007, sampling point MRT000 | Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Aug 21, 2007, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007 |
-
- Collected
- Aug 13, 2008
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 080814-074PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0019 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Aug 13, 2008
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 080814-073PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0035 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Aug 13, 2008
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 080814-072PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0079 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Aug 13, 2008
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 080814-071PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0057 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0024 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Aug 13, 2008
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 080814-070PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0042 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Aug 13, 2008
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 080814-069PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0037 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Jul 7, 2008
- Sampling point
- TF080 Treatment Plant T080
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 080708-005NI
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008
-
Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- 0.21 mg/l
-
Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- 0.2 mg/l
-
Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.02 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Nov 13, 2007
- Sampling point
- TF080 Treatment Plant T080
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 071114-029NI
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2007 – Dec 31, 2007
-
Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- 0.31 mg/l
-
Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- 0.31 mg/l
-
Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.02 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Aug 21, 2007
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 070822-005HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- 0.0001 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
-
- Collected
- Aug 21, 2007
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 070822-004TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
-
Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007
Routine (10).