This is a rebuild of Drinking Water Watch and not yet the official record. Use the agency’s current Drinking Water Watch for anything you need to rely on.
Chemical and radiological sample results
MS0470069 , South Victoria
17 of the 57 analytes this system has been tested for have been detected at least once, across 215 samples on record.
The other 40 were tested for and never found. An analyte is counted here if any result on record measured it, so this covers the whole history and not the samples listed below.
Across all 215 samples on record, detections range from October 8, 2003 to July 23, 2026. These figures cover the whole record.
What counts as a non-detect is defined in the help: Less than Indicator. This system’s violations.
What has been detected, ever
Every analyte measured above its reporting level at any point in this system’s record, most often detected first. This is not limited to the samples listed below.
| Analyte | Kind | Detected in | First detected | Last detected |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper, Free 1022 | Inorganic Chemical | 69 of 69 results | Sep 20, 2004 | Aug 13, 2024 |
| Lead 1030 | Inorganic Chemical | 60 of 69 results | Sep 20, 2004 | Jul 6, 2021 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 | Inorganic Chemical | 42 of 46 results | May 24, 2004 | Jul 7, 2026 |
| Nitrate 1040 | Inorganic Chemical | 42 of 46 results | May 24, 2004 | Jul 7, 2026 |
| Barium 1010 | Inorganic Chemical | 22 of 22 results | Oct 8, 2003 | Jul 23, 2026 |
| Chromium 1020 | Inorganic Chemical | 13 of 22 results | Oct 8, 2003 | Mar 11, 2025 |
| Gross Alpha, Incl. Radon & U 4002 | Radionuclide | 10 of 10 results | Dec 13, 2011 | Jul 18, 2012 |
| Combined Radium (-226 & -228) 4010 | Radionuclide | 10 of 10 results | Dec 13, 2011 | Jul 18, 2012 |
| Nickel 1036 | Inorganic Chemical | 9 of 20 results | Mar 8, 2004 | Mar 11, 2025 |
| Sodium 1052 | Inorganic Chemical | 6 of 6 results | Sep 23, 2019 | Feb 26, 2025 |
| Radium-226 4020 | Radionuclide | 5 of 10 results | Dec 13, 2011 | Jul 18, 2012 |
| Radium-228 4030 | Radionuclide | 5 of 10 results | Dec 13, 2011 | Jul 18, 2012 |
| Fluoride 1025 | Inorganic Chemical | 4 of 22 results | Jan 11, 2010 | Apr 9, 2019 |
| Selenium 1045 | Inorganic Chemical | 3 of 22 results | Apr 4, 2005 | Mar 8, 2006 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Organic Chemical | 2 of 7 results | Jun 14, 2010 | Oct 18, 2022 |
| TTHM 2950 | Organic Chemical | 2 of 7 results | Aug 20, 2007 | Jun 14, 2010 |
| Nitrite 1041 | Inorganic Chemical | 1 of 46 results | May 7, 2007 | May 7, 2007 |
No date range is applied: this list draws on every sample on record. Show the last two years only.
The most recent samples, result by result
The table below lists 131–140 of 215 samples, newest first — collected June 14, 2010 to October 21, 2010. The summary above covers all 215.
26 results from the 10 samples listed here: 19 detected, 7 not detected. Across the whole record it is 305 of 939. A sample is analysed for many analytes at once, so one sample appears on as many rows as it had results.
| Result | Analyte | Monitoring period |
|---|---|---|
|
||
| 0.1362 mg/l , sample collected Oct 21, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jul 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| 0.0053 mg/l , sample collected Oct 21, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jul 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| 0.1213 mg/l , sample collected Oct 21, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jul 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| 0.0034 mg/l , sample collected Oct 21, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jul 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| 0.0544 mg/l , sample collected Oct 21, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jul 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| 0.0013 mg/l , sample collected Oct 21, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jul 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| 0.0253 mg/l , sample collected Oct 21, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jul 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| 0.0024 mg/l , sample collected Oct 21, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jul 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| 0.0251 mg/l , sample collected Oct 21, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jul 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| 0.0023 mg/l , sample collected Oct 21, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jul 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| 0.0509 mg/l , sample collected Oct 21, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jul 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| 0.0048 mg/l , sample collected Oct 21, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jul 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| 0.1417 mg/l , sample collected Oct 21, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jul 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| 0.0155 mg/l , sample collected Oct 21, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jul 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| 0.78 mg/l , sample collected Aug 24, 2010, sampling point TF102 | Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| 0.78 mg/l , sample collected Aug 24, 2010, sampling point TF102 | Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| Not detected below 0.05 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 24, 2010, sampling point TF102 | Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| 0.78 mg/l , sample collected Aug 24, 2010, sampling point TF101 | Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| 0.77 mg/l , sample collected Aug 24, 2010, sampling point TF101 | Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| Not detected below 0.05 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 24, 2010, sampling point TF101 | Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 14, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 14, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 14, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 14, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 14, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Jun 14, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
-
- Collected
- Oct 21, 2010
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 101022-026PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jul 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.1362 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0053 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Oct 21, 2010
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 101022-025PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jul 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.1213 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0034 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Oct 21, 2010
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 101022-024PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jul 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0544 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0013 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Oct 21, 2010
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 101022-023PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jul 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0253 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0024 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Oct 21, 2010
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 101022-022PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jul 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0251 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0023 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Oct 21, 2010
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 101022-021PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jul 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0509 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0048 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Oct 21, 2010
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 101022-020PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jul 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.1417 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0155 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Aug 24, 2010
- Sampling point
- TF102 Treatment Plant T102
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100825-002NI
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- 0.78 mg/l
-
Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- 0.78 mg/l
-
Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.05 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Aug 24, 2010
- Sampling point
- TF101 Treatment Plant T101
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100825-001NI
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- 0.78 mg/l
-
Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- 0.77 mg/l
-
Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.05 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Jun 14, 2010
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100615-001HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
-
Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Routine (10).