This is a rebuild of Drinking Water Watch and not yet the official record. Use the agency’s current Drinking Water Watch for anything you need to rely on.
Chemical and radiological sample results
MS0470105 , Marshall Co Water Assn
18 of the 61 analytes this system has been tested for have been detected at least once, across 449 samples on record.
The other 43 were tested for and never found. An analyte is counted here if any result on record measured it, so this covers the whole history and not the samples listed below.
Across all 449 samples on record, detections range from October 8, 2003 to July 9, 2026. These figures cover the whole record.
What counts as a non-detect is defined in the help: Less than Indicator. This system’s violations.
What has been detected, ever
Every analyte measured above its reporting level at any point in this system’s record, most often detected first. This is not limited to the samples listed below.
| Analyte | Kind | Detected in | First detected | Last detected |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper, Free 1022 | Inorganic Chemical | 313 of 313 results | Sep 23, 2004 | Jul 30, 2024 |
| Lead 1030 | Inorganic Chemical | 184 of 313 results | Sep 23, 2004 | Jul 30, 2024 |
| Barium 1010 | Inorganic Chemical | 14 of 14 results | Oct 8, 2003 | Mar 11, 2025 |
| Sodium 1052 | Inorganic Chemical | 8 of 8 results | Sep 17, 2019 | Feb 25, 2025 |
| Gross Alpha, Incl. Radon & U 4002 | Radionuclide | 5 of 5 results | Dec 14, 2011 | Jul 19, 2012 |
| Calcium 1016 | Inorganic Chemical | 4 of 4 results | Nov 19, 2021 | Dec 1, 2021 |
| Chloride 1017 | Inorganic Chemical | 4 of 4 results | Nov 19, 2021 | Dec 1, 2021 |
| Conductivity @ 25 C Umhos/CM 1064 | Water Quality | 4 of 4 results | Nov 19, 2021 | Dec 1, 2021 |
| Alkalinity, Total 1927 | Water Quality | 4 of 4 results | Nov 19, 2021 | Dec 1, 2021 |
| Xylenes, Total 2955 | Organic Chemical | 3 of 15 results | Aug 2, 2023 | Jul 9, 2026 |
| Nickel 1036 | Inorganic Chemical | 3 of 14 results | Mar 10, 2004 | Mar 11, 2025 |
| Chromium 1020 | Inorganic Chemical | 2 of 14 results | Mar 1, 2016 | Jul 12, 2023 |
| Sulfate 1055 | Inorganic Chemical | 2 of 6 results | Nov 19, 2021 | Nov 19, 2021 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Organic Chemical | 2 of 20 results | Aug 28, 2007 | Jun 17, 2010 |
| TTHM 2950 | Organic Chemical | 2 of 21 results | Aug 28, 2007 | Jun 17, 2010 |
| Color 1905 | Water Quality | 1 of 4 results | Dec 1, 2021 | Dec 1, 2021 |
| Dichloromethane 2964 | Organic Chemical | 1 of 15 results | Aug 26, 2004 | Aug 26, 2004 |
| Selenium 1045 | Inorganic Chemical | 1 of 14 results | Mar 10, 2004 | Mar 10, 2004 |
No date range is applied: this list draws on every sample on record. Show the last two years only.
The most recent samples, result by result
The table below lists 271–280 of 449 samples, newest first — collected March 30, 2010 to October 18, 2010. The summary above covers all 449.
37 results from the 10 samples listed here: 14 detected, 23 not detected. Across the whole record it is 557 of 1,447. A sample is analysed for many analytes at once, so one sample appears on as many rows as it had results.
| Result | Analyte | Monitoring period |
|---|---|---|
|
||
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Oct 18, 2010, sampling point TF080 | Arsenic 1005 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| 0.010905 mg/l , sample collected Oct 18, 2010, sampling point TF080 | Barium 1010 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Oct 18, 2010, sampling point TF080 | Cadmium 1015 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Oct 18, 2010, sampling point TF080 | Chromium 1020 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| Not detected below 0.1 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Oct 18, 2010, sampling point TF080 | Fluoride 1025 EPA method 380-75WE | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Oct 18, 2010, sampling point TF080 | Mercury 1035 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Oct 18, 2010, sampling point TF080 | Nickel 1036 EPA method 200.8 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.0025 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Oct 18, 2010, sampling point TF080 | Selenium 1045 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Oct 18, 2010, sampling point TF080 | Antimony, Total 1074 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Oct 18, 2010, sampling point TF080 | Beryllium, Total 1075 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Oct 18, 2010, sampling point TF080 | Thallium, Total 1085 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| Not detected below 0.25 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 25, 2010, sampling point TF080 | Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| Not detected below 0.2 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 25, 2010, sampling point TF080 | Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| Not detected below 0.05 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 25, 2010, sampling point TF080 | Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 17, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 17, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 17, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 17, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Jun 17, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 17, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 17, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 17, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 17, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 17, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Jun 17, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| 0.6238 mg/l , sample collected Mar 31, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2010 – Jun 30, 2010 |
| 0.0012 mg/l , sample collected Mar 31, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2010 – Jun 30, 2010 |
|
||
| 0.1085 mg/l , sample collected Mar 30, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2010 – Jun 30, 2010 |
| 0.001 mg/l , sample collected Mar 30, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2010 – Jun 30, 2010 |
|
||
| 0.1206 mg/l , sample collected Mar 30, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2010 – Jun 30, 2010 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Mar 30, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2010 – Jun 30, 2010 |
|
||
| 0.0285 mg/l , sample collected Mar 30, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2010 – Jun 30, 2010 |
| 0.0006 mg/l , sample collected Mar 30, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2010 – Jun 30, 2010 |
|
||
| 0.291 mg/l , sample collected Mar 30, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2010 – Jun 30, 2010 |
| 0.0008 mg/l , sample collected Mar 30, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2010 – Jun 30, 2010 |
|
||
| 0.2769 mg/l , sample collected Mar 30, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2010 – Jun 30, 2010 |
| 0.0008 mg/l , sample collected Mar 30, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2010 – Jun 30, 2010 |
-
- Collected
- Oct 18, 2010
- Sampling point
- TF080 Treatment Plant T080
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 101019-025IN
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
-
Arsenic 1005 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Barium 1010 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.010905 mg/l
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Cadmium 1015 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Chromium 1020 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Fluoride 1025 EPA method 380-75WE
- Result
- Not detected below 0.1 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Mercury 1035 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Nickel 1036 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Selenium 1045 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0025 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Antimony, Total 1074 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Beryllium, Total 1075 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Thallium, Total 1085 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
- Collected
- Aug 25, 2010
- Sampling point
- TF080 Treatment Plant T080
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100826-066NI
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.25 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.2 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.05 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Jun 17, 2010
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100618-005TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
-
Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
- Collected
- Jun 17, 2010
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100618-005HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
-
Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
- Collected
- Mar 31, 2010
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100331-082PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2010 – Jun 30, 2010
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.6238 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0012 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Mar 30, 2010
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100331-089PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2010 – Jun 30, 2010
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.1085 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.001 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Mar 30, 2010
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100331-088PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2010 – Jun 30, 2010
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.1206 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Mar 30, 2010
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100331-087PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2010 – Jun 30, 2010
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0285 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0006 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Mar 30, 2010
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100331-086PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2010 – Jun 30, 2010
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.291 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0008 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Mar 30, 2010
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100331-085PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2010 – Jun 30, 2010
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.2769 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0008 mg/l
Routine (10).