This is a rebuild of Drinking Water Watch and not yet the official record. Use the agency’s current Drinking Water Watch for anything you need to rely on.
Chemical and radiological sample results
MS0480016 , Quincy Water Association #2
16 of the 57 analytes this system has been tested for have been detected at least once, across 153 samples on record.
The other 41 were tested for and never found. An analyte is counted here if any result on record measured it, so this covers the whole history and not the samples listed below.
Across all 153 samples on record, detections range from October 8, 2003 to February 24, 2026. These figures cover the whole record.
What counts as a non-detect is defined in the help: Less than Indicator. This system’s violations.
What has been detected, ever
Every analyte measured above its reporting level at any point in this system’s record, most often detected first. This is not limited to the samples listed below.
| Analyte | Kind | Detected in | First detected | Last detected |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper, Free 1022 | Inorganic Chemical | 60 of 60 results | Jul 31, 2007 | Sep 8, 2023 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 | Inorganic Chemical | 22 of 22 results | May 26, 2004 | Feb 24, 2026 |
| Nitrate 1040 | Inorganic Chemical | 22 of 22 results | May 26, 2004 | Feb 24, 2026 |
| Barium 1010 | Inorganic Chemical | 10 of 10 results | Oct 8, 2003 | Mar 19, 2025 |
| Nickel 1036 | Inorganic Chemical | 10 of 10 results | Oct 8, 2003 | Mar 19, 2025 |
| Lead 1030 | Inorganic Chemical | 7 of 60 results | Jul 31, 2007 | Aug 5, 2020 |
| Beryllium, Total 1075 | Inorganic Chemical | 5 of 10 results | Oct 8, 2003 | Jan 20, 2010 |
| Chromium 1020 | Inorganic Chemical | 4 of 10 results | Jul 18, 2012 | Oct 5, 2022 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Organic Chemical | 4 of 20 results | Aug 29, 2007 | Sep 30, 2020 |
| Sodium 1052 | Inorganic Chemical | 3 of 3 results | Sep 23, 2019 | Mar 3, 2025 |
| Fluoride 1025 | Inorganic Chemical | 3 of 10 results | Jul 18, 2012 | May 8, 2019 |
| TTHM 2950 | Organic Chemical | 2 of 20 results | Aug 29, 2007 | Jun 16, 2010 |
| Cadmium 1015 | Inorganic Chemical | 2 of 10 results | Mar 8, 2004 | Apr 4, 2005 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 | Organic Chemical | 1 of 14 results | Sep 30, 2020 | Sep 30, 2020 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 | Organic Chemical | 1 of 14 results | Aug 14, 2013 | Aug 14, 2013 |
| Selenium 1045 | Inorganic Chemical | 1 of 10 results | Apr 4, 2005 | Apr 4, 2005 |
No date range is applied: this list draws on every sample on record. Show the last two years only.
The most recent samples, result by result
The table below lists 111–120 of 153 samples, newest first — collected January 20, 2010 to August 24, 2011. The summary above covers all 153.
37 results from the 10 samples listed here: 14 detected, 23 not detected. Across the whole record it is 157 of 654. A sample is analysed for many analytes at once, so one sample appears on as many rows as it had results.
| Result | Analyte | Monitoring period |
|---|---|---|
|
||
| 0.0118 mg/l , sample collected Aug 24, 2011, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 24, 2011, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011 |
|
||
| 0.1362 mg/l , sample collected Aug 24, 2011, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 24, 2011, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011 |
|
||
| 0.0963 mg/l , sample collected Aug 24, 2011, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 24, 2011, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011 |
|
||
| 0.2207 mg/l , sample collected Aug 24, 2011, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011 |
| 0.0081 mg/l , sample collected Aug 24, 2011, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011 |
|
||
| 0.82 mg/l , sample collected Mar 2, 2011, sampling point TF080 | Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2011 |
| 0.82 mg/l , sample collected Mar 2, 2011, sampling point TF080 | Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2011 |
| Not detected below 0.02 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Mar 2, 2011, sampling point TF080 | Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2011 |
|
||
| 0.81 mg/l , sample collected Sep 1, 2010, sampling point TF080 | Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| 0.81 mg/l , sample collected Sep 1, 2010, sampling point TF080 | Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| Not detected below 0.05 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 1, 2010, sampling point TF080 | Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 16, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 16, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 16, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 16, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Jun 16, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 16, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 16, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 16, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 16, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 16, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Jun 16, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| Not detected below 15 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jan 20, 2010, sampling point TF080 | Cyanide 1024 EPA method QC10204001X | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jan 20, 2010, sampling point TF080 | Arsenic 1005 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| 0.0099 mg/l , sample collected Jan 20, 2010, sampling point TF080 | Barium 1010 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| Not detected below 0.0001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jan 20, 2010, sampling point TF080 | Cadmium 1015 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jan 20, 2010, sampling point TF080 | Chromium 1020 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| Not detected below 0.1 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jan 20, 2010, sampling point TF080 | Fluoride 1025 EPA method 380-75WE | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| Not detected below 0.0002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jan 20, 2010, sampling point TF080 | Mercury 1035 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| 0.0019 mg/l , sample collected Jan 20, 2010, sampling point TF080 | Nickel 1036 EPA method 200.8 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.0025 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jan 20, 2010, sampling point TF080 | Selenium 1045 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jan 20, 2010, sampling point TF080 | Antimony, Total 1074 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| 0.0002 mg/l , sample collected Jan 20, 2010, sampling point TF080 | Beryllium, Total 1075 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jan 20, 2010, sampling point TF080 | Thallium, Total 1085 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
-
- Collected
- Aug 24, 2011
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 110826-093PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0118 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Aug 24, 2011
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 110826-079PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.1362 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Aug 24, 2011
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 110826-078PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0963 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Aug 24, 2011
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 110826-077PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2011
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.2207 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0081 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Mar 2, 2011
- Sampling point
- TF080 Treatment Plant T080
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 110303-035NI
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2011
-
Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- 0.82 mg/l
-
Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- 0.82 mg/l
-
Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.02 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Sep 1, 2010
- Sampling point
- TF080 Treatment Plant T080
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100902-043NI
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- 0.81 mg/l
-
Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- 0.81 mg/l
-
Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.05 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Jun 16, 2010
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100617-004TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
-
Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
- Collected
- Jun 16, 2010
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100617-005HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
-
Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
- Collected
- Jan 20, 2010
- Sampling point
- TF080 Treatment Plant T080
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100121-001CN
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Cyanide 1024 EPA method QC10204001X
- Result
- Not detected below 15 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Jan 20, 2010
- Sampling point
- TF080 Treatment Plant T080
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100121-019IN
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
-
Arsenic 1005 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Barium 1010 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0099 mg/l
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Cadmium 1015 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Chromium 1020 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Fluoride 1025 EPA method 380-75WE
- Result
- Not detected below 0.1 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Mercury 1035 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Nickel 1036 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0019 mg/l
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Selenium 1045 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0025 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Antimony, Total 1074 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Beryllium, Total 1075 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0002 mg/l
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Thallium, Total 1085 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Routine (10).