This is a rebuild of Drinking Water Watch and not yet the official record. Use the agency’s current Drinking Water Watch for anything you need to rely on.
Chemical and radiological sample results
MS0490021 , Poplar Creek Water Assn #2
4 of the 8 analytes this system has been tested for have been detected at least once, across 19 samples on record.
The other 4 were tested for and never found. An analyte is counted here if any result on record measured it, so this covers the whole history and not the samples listed below.
Across all 19 samples on record, detections range from July 19, 2004 to August 6, 2008. These figures cover the whole record.
What counts as a non-detect is defined in the help: Less than Indicator. This system’s violations.
What has been detected, ever
Every analyte measured above its reporting level at any point in this system’s record, most often detected first. This is not limited to the samples listed below.
| Analyte | Kind | Detected in | First detected | Last detected |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper, Free 1022 | Inorganic Chemical | 13 of 13 results | Sep 21, 2004 | Aug 6, 2008 |
| Lead 1030 | Inorganic Chemical | 11 of 13 results | Sep 21, 2004 | Aug 6, 2008 |
| TTHM 2950 | Organic Chemical | 2 of 3 results | Jul 19, 2004 | Oct 19, 2006 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Organic Chemical | 2 of 3 results | Nov 17, 2005 | Oct 11, 2006 |
No date range is applied: this list draws on every sample on record. Show the last two years only.
The most recent samples, result by result
The table below lists 1–10 of 19 samples, newest first — collected November 17, 2005 to August 6, 2008. The summary above covers all 19.
21 results from the 10 samples listed here: 17 detected, 4 not detected. Across the whole record it is 28 of 36. A sample is analysed for many analytes at once, so one sample appears on as many rows as it had results.
| Result | Analyte | Monitoring period |
|---|---|---|
|
||
| 0.0288 mg/l , sample collected Aug 6, 2008, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
| 0.0016 mg/l , sample collected Aug 6, 2008, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
|
||
| 0.031 mg/l , sample collected Aug 6, 2008, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
| 0.0016 mg/l , sample collected Aug 6, 2008, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
|
||
| 0.251 mg/l , sample collected Aug 6, 2008, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
| 0.0042 mg/l , sample collected Aug 6, 2008, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
|
||
| 0.5748 mg/l , sample collected Aug 6, 2008, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
| 0.0011 mg/l , sample collected Aug 6, 2008, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
|
||
| 0.2229 mg/l , sample collected Aug 6, 2008, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
| 0.0014 mg/l , sample collected Aug 6, 2008, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
|
||
| 0.4527 mg/l , sample collected Aug 6, 2008, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
| 0.0009 mg/l , sample collected Aug 6, 2008, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
|
||
| 0.0365 mg/l , sample collected Aug 5, 2008, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
| 0.0021 mg/l , sample collected Aug 5, 2008, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
|
||
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Oct 19, 2006, sampling point MRT000 | Chloroform 2941 EPA method 551.1 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Oct 19, 2006, sampling point MRT000 | Bromoform 2942 EPA method 551.1 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Oct 19, 2006, sampling point MRT000 | Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 551.1 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Oct 19, 2006, sampling point MRT000 | Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 551.1 | Not recorded |
| 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Oct 19, 2006, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 551.1 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
|
||
| 0.002 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Oct 11, 2006, sampling point MRT000 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 EPA method 552.2 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
|
||
| 0.003 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Nov 17, 2005, sampling point MRT000 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 EPA method 552.2 | Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2005 |
-
- Collected
- Aug 6, 2008
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 080807-051PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0288 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0016 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Aug 6, 2008
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 080807-050PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.031 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0016 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Aug 6, 2008
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 080807-049PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.251 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0042 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Aug 6, 2008
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 080807-046PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.5748 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0011 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Aug 6, 2008
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 080807-044PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.2229 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0014 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Aug 6, 2008
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 080807-043PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.4527 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0009 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Aug 5, 2008
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 080807-048PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0365 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0021 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Oct 19, 2006
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 061020-003TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
-
Chloroform 2941 EPA method 551.1
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Bromoform 2942 EPA method 551.1
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 551.1
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 551.1
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 551.1
- Result
- 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008
-
- Collected
- Oct 11, 2006
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 061012-001HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- 0.002 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
-
- Collected
- Nov 17, 2005
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 051118-009HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2005
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- 0.003 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
Routine (10).