Skip to main content
Alpha

This is a rebuild of Drinking Water Watch and not yet the official record. Use the agency’s current Drinking Water Watch for anything you need to rely on.

Chemical and radiological sample results

MS0490022 , Stewart Water Assc #2

22 of the 57 analytes this system has been tested for have been detected at least once, across 142 samples on record.

The other 35 were tested for and never found. An analyte is counted here if any result on record measured it, so this covers the whole history and not the samples listed below.

Across all 142 samples on record, detections range from October 8, 2003 to March 19, 2025. These figures cover the whole record.

What counts as a non-detect is defined in the help: Less than Indicator. This system’s violations.

What has been detected, ever

Every analyte measured above its reporting level at any point in this system’s record, most often detected first. This is not limited to the samples listed below.

Every analyte ever detected for Stewart Water Assc #2, with how many results found it and when it was first and last detected. Covers the whole record, not only the samples listed below.
Analyte Kind Detected in First detected Last detected
Copper, Free 1022 Inorganic Chemical 60 of 60 results Sep 14, 2004 Aug 27, 2024
Lead 1030 Inorganic Chemical 55 of 60 results Sep 14, 2004 Aug 27, 2024
Barium 1010 Inorganic Chemical 10 of 10 results Oct 8, 2003 Mar 19, 2025
Fluoride 1025 Inorganic Chemical 9 of 10 results Oct 8, 2003 Mar 19, 2025
TTHM 2950 Organic Chemical 7 of 7 results Jul 21, 2004 Feb 25, 2025
Chromium 1020 Inorganic Chemical 6 of 10 results Mar 10, 2004 May 8, 2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 Organic Chemical 5 of 7 results Jun 16, 2010 Feb 25, 2025
Sodium 1052 Inorganic Chemical 3 of 3 results Sep 24, 2019 Feb 25, 2025
Nickel 1036 Inorganic Chemical 3 of 10 results Apr 29, 2013 Sep 27, 2022
Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 Organic Chemical 3 of 4 results Aug 27, 2007 Jul 11, 2016
Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 Organic Chemical 3 of 4 results Aug 27, 2007 Jul 11, 2016
Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 Organic Chemical 3 of 4 results Aug 27, 2007 Jul 11, 2016
Chloroform 2941 Organic Chemical 3 of 4 results Aug 27, 2007 Jul 11, 2016
Bromodichloromethane 2943 Organic Chemical 3 of 4 results Aug 27, 2007 Jul 11, 2016
Dibromochloromethane 2944 Organic Chemical 3 of 4 results Aug 27, 2007 Jul 11, 2016
Arsenic 1005 Inorganic Chemical 2 of 10 results May 8, 2019 Sep 27, 2022
Radium-226 4020 Radionuclide 2 of 7 results Jun 25, 2018 Sep 10, 2019
Bromoform 2942 Organic Chemical 2 of 4 results Aug 27, 2007 Aug 12, 2013
Nitrite 1041 Inorganic Chemical 2 of 22 results Nov 21, 2005 May 13, 2009
Selenium 1045 Inorganic Chemical 2 of 10 results Mar 10, 2004 Mar 8, 2006
Combined Radium (-226 & -228) 4010 Radionuclide 1 of 7 results Sep 10, 2019 Sep 10, 2019
Radium-228 4030 Radionuclide 1 of 7 results Sep 10, 2019 Sep 10, 2019

No date range is applied: this list draws on every sample on record. Show the last two years only.

The most recent samples, result by result

The table below lists 81–90 of 142 samples, newest first — collected August 27, 2007 to June 22, 2010. The summary above covers all 142.

35 results from the 10 samples listed here: 16 detected, 19 not detected. Across the whole record it is 188 of 604. A sample is analysed for many analytes at once, so one sample appears on as many rows as it had results.

Units in this table

TTHM is recorded on this page in ug/l and mg/l. 1 mg/l = 1,000 ug/l.

Chemical and radiological sample results for Stewart Water Assc #2, every result from 81 to 90 of 142 samples shown, newest first. Not detected means the amount was below the level the laboratory can reliably report, which is given beside it.
Result Analyte Monitoring period
Collected
Jun 22, 2010
Sampling point
DS000 Distribution
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
100624-039PB
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
0.0041 mg/l , sample collected Jun 22, 2010, sampling point DS000 Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
0.0008 mg/l , sample collected Jun 22, 2010, sampling point DS000 Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Collected
Jun 22, 2010
Sampling point
DS000 Distribution
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
100624-038PB
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
0.1452 mg/l , sample collected Jun 22, 2010, sampling point DS000 Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
0.0009 mg/l , sample collected Jun 22, 2010, sampling point DS000 Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Collected
Jun 22, 2010
Sampling point
DS000 Distribution
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
100624-037PB
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
0.0089 mg/l , sample collected Jun 22, 2010, sampling point DS000 Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 22, 2010, sampling point DS000 Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Collected
Jun 16, 2010
Sampling point
MRT000 Max. Res. Time
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
100617-015TH
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 16, 2010, sampling point MRT000 Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 16, 2010, sampling point MRT000 Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 16, 2010, sampling point MRT000 Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 16, 2010, sampling point MRT000 Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Jun 16, 2010, sampling point MRT000 TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Collected
Jun 16, 2010
Sampling point
MRT000 Max. Res. Time
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
100617-015HA
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 16, 2010, sampling point MRT000 Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 16, 2010, sampling point MRT000 Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 16, 2010, sampling point MRT000 Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 16, 2010, sampling point MRT000 Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 16, 2010, sampling point MRT000 Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Jun 16, 2010, sampling point MRT000 Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Collected
Jan 19, 2010
Sampling point
TF101 Treatment Plant T101
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
100120-001CN
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
Not detected below 15 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jan 19, 2010, sampling point TF101 Cyanide 1024 EPA method QC10204001X Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
Collected
May 13, 2009
Sampling point
TF101 Treatment Plant T101
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
090514-009NI
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
Not detected below 0.25 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected May 13, 2009, sampling point TF101 Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2 Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009
Not detected below 0.2 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected May 13, 2009, sampling point TF101 Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2 Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009
0.13 mg/l , sample collected May 13, 2009, sampling point TF101 Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2 Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009
Collected
Oct 27, 2008
Sampling point
TF101 Treatment Plant T101
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
081028-021NI
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
Not detected below 0.25 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Oct 27, 2008, sampling point TF101 Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2 Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008
Not detected below 0.2 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Oct 27, 2008, sampling point TF101 Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2 Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008
Not detected below 0.05 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Oct 27, 2008, sampling point TF101 Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2 Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008
Collected
Aug 27, 2007
Sampling point
MRT000 Max. Res. Time
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
070828-014HA
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 27, 2007, sampling point MRT000 Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
0.001 mg/l , sample collected Aug 27, 2007, sampling point MRT000 Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
0.002 mg/l , sample collected Aug 27, 2007, sampling point MRT000 Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 27, 2007, sampling point MRT000 Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
0.001 mg/l , sample collected Aug 27, 2007, sampling point MRT000 Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 0.006 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 27, 2007, sampling point MRT000 Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007
Collected
Aug 27, 2007
Sampling point
MRT000 Max. Res. Time
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
070828-012TH
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
4.38 ug/l , sample collected Aug 27, 2007, sampling point MRT000 Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
5.25 ug/l , sample collected Aug 27, 2007, sampling point MRT000 Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
7.89 ug/l , sample collected Aug 27, 2007, sampling point MRT000 Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
13.9 ug/l , sample collected Aug 27, 2007, sampling point MRT000 Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
31.42 ug/l , sample collected Aug 27, 2007, sampling point MRT000 TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007

Routine (10).