This is a rebuild of Drinking Water Watch and not yet the official record. Use the agency’s current Drinking Water Watch for anything you need to rely on.
Chemical and radiological sample results
MS0530011 , Mhoon Farm Water Association
4 of the 8 analytes this system has been tested for have been detected at least once, across 14 samples on record.
The other 4 were tested for and never found. An analyte is counted here if any result on record measured it, so this covers the whole history and not the samples listed below.
Across all 14 samples on record, detections range from August 21, 2007 to August 28, 2007. These figures cover the whole record.
What counts as a non-detect is defined in the help: Less than Indicator. This system’s violations.
What has been detected, ever
Every analyte measured above its reporting level at any point in this system’s record, most often detected first. This is not limited to the samples listed below.
| Analyte | Kind | Detected in | First detected | Last detected |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper, Free 1022 | Inorganic Chemical | 10 of 10 results | Aug 21, 2007 | Aug 21, 2007 |
| Lead 1030 | Inorganic Chemical | 5 of 10 results | Aug 21, 2007 | Aug 21, 2007 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Organic Chemical | 1 of 2 results | Aug 28, 2007 | Aug 28, 2007 |
| TTHM 2950 | Organic Chemical | 1 of 2 results | Aug 28, 2007 | Aug 28, 2007 |
No date range is applied: this list draws on every sample on record. Show the last two years only.
The most recent samples, result by result
The table below lists 1–10 of 14 samples, newest first — collected August 21, 2007 to August 28, 2007. The summary above covers all 14.
22 results from the 10 samples listed here: 14 detected, 8 not detected. Across the whole record it is 17 of 28. A sample is analysed for many analytes at once, so one sample appears on as many rows as it had results.
| Result | Analyte | Monitoring period |
|---|---|---|
|
||
| 0.0011 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Aug 28, 2007, sampling point MRT000 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 EPA method 552.2 | Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007 |
|
||
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 28, 2007, sampling point MRT000 | Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 28, 2007, sampling point MRT000 | Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 28, 2007, sampling point MRT000 | Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 28, 2007, sampling point MRT000 | Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Aug 28, 2007, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007 |
|
||
| 0.0246 mg/l , sample collected Aug 21, 2007, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
| 0.0028 mg/l , sample collected Aug 21, 2007, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
|
||
| 0.0036 mg/l , sample collected Aug 21, 2007, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 21, 2007, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
|
||
| 0.2736 mg/l , sample collected Aug 21, 2007, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 21, 2007, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
|
||
| 0.8683 mg/l , sample collected Aug 21, 2007, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
| 0.0008 mg/l , sample collected Aug 21, 2007, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
|
||
| 0.0085 mg/l , sample collected Aug 21, 2007, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 21, 2007, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
|
||
| 0.0696 mg/l , sample collected Aug 21, 2007, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 21, 2007, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
|
||
| 0.4043 mg/l , sample collected Aug 21, 2007, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
| 0.0012 mg/l , sample collected Aug 21, 2007, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
|
||
| 0.3432 mg/l , sample collected Aug 21, 2007, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
| 0.0015 mg/l , sample collected Aug 21, 2007, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
-
- Collected
- Aug 28, 2007
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 070829-012HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- 0.0011 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
-
- Collected
- Aug 28, 2007
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 070829-013TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
-
Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007
-
- Collected
- Aug 21, 2007
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 070822-472PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0246 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0028 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Aug 21, 2007
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 070822-470PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0036 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Aug 21, 2007
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 070822-467PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.2736 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Aug 21, 2007
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 070822-367PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.8683 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0008 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Aug 21, 2007
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 070822-364PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0085 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Aug 21, 2007
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 070822-155PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0696 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Aug 21, 2007
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 070822-165PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.4043 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0012 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Aug 21, 2007
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 070822-156PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.3432 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0015 mg/l
Routine (10).