Chemical and radiological sample results

MS0530013 ·, Morgan Chapel Water Assn

What has been detected, ever

Every analyte measured above its reporting level at any point in this system’s record, most often detected first. This is not limited to the samples listed below.

Scroll the table sideways for the dates.

No date range is applied: this list draws on every sample on record. Show the last two years only.

The most recent samples, result by result

The table below lists 121–130 of 200 samples, newest first — collected February 1, 2010 to February 13, 2012. The summary above covers all 200.

33 results from the 10 samples listed here: 9 detected, 24 not detected. Across the whole record it is 264 of 1,034. A sample is analysed for many analytes at once, so one sample appears on as many rows as it had results.

• Collected

  Feb 13, 2012 15:20

  Sampling point

  TF101 Treatment Plant T101

  Sample type

  Routine

  Lab sample

  120214-022RU

  Laboratory

  MSDH Lab

  Monitoring period

  Jan 1, 2012 – Mar 31, 2012

  • Combined Uranium 4006 EPA method 200.8

    Result

    Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

• Collected

  Dec 12, 2011 14:20

  Sampling point

  TF102 Treatment Plant T102

  Sample type

  Routine

  Lab sample

  111213-020

  Laboratory

  Radiation Safety Engineering

  • Gross Alpha, Incl. Radon & U 4002 EPA method 00-02

    Result

    1.3 pci/l

    Monitoring period

    Not recorded

  • Combined Radium (-226 & -228) 4010

    Result

    0.3 pci/l

    Monitoring period

    Not recorded

  • Radium-226 4020 EPA method 903.1

    Result

    0.3 pci/l

    Monitoring period

    Oct 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2011

  • Radium-228 4030 EPA method 904.0

    Result

    Not detected below 0.6 pci/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Oct 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2011

• Collected

  Dec 12, 2011 15:00

  Sampling point

  TF101 Treatment Plant T101

  Sample type

  Routine

  Lab sample

  111213-021

  Laboratory

  Radiation Safety Engineering

  • Gross Alpha, Incl. Radon & U 4002 EPA method 00-02

    Result

    2.2 pci/l

    Monitoring period

    Not recorded

  • Combined Radium (-226 & -228) 4010

    Result

    0.6 pci/l

    Monitoring period

    Not recorded

  • Radium-226 4020 EPA method 903.1

    Result

    0.6 pci/l

    Monitoring period

    Oct 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2011

  • Radium-228 4030 EPA method 904.0

    Result

    Not detected below 0.56 pci/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Oct 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2011

• Collected

  Mar 9, 2011

  Sampling point

  TF102 Treatment Plant T102

  Sample type

  Routine

  Lab sample

  110310-019NI

  Laboratory

  MSDH Lab

  Monitoring period

  Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2011

  • Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.1 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

  • Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.08 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

  • Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.02 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

• Collected

  Mar 9, 2011

  Sampling point

  TF101 Treatment Plant T101

  Sample type

  Routine

  Lab sample

  110310-005NI

  Laboratory

  MSDH Lab

  Monitoring period

  Jan 1, 2011 – Dec 31, 2011

  • Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.1 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

  • Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.08 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

  • Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.02 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

• Collected

  Aug 30, 2010

  Sampling point

  TF102 Treatment Plant T102

  Sample type

  Routine

  Lab sample

  100831-076NI

  Laboratory

  MSDH Lab

  Monitoring period

  Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010

  • Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.25 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

  • Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.2 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

  • Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.05 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

• Collected

  Aug 30, 2010

  Sampling point

  TF101 Treatment Plant T101

  Sample type

  Routine

  Lab sample

  100831-068NI

  Laboratory

  MSDH Lab

  Monitoring period

  Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010

  • Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.25 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

  • Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.2 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

  • Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.05 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

• Collected

  Jun 14, 2010

  Sampling point

  MRT000 Max. Res. Time

  Sample type

  Routine

  Lab sample

  100615-022HA

  Laboratory

  MSDH Lab

  • Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Not recorded

  • Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Not recorded

  • Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Not recorded

  • Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Not recorded

  • Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2

    Result

    Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Not recorded

  • Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456

    Result

    0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.

    Monitoring period

    Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010

• Collected

  Jun 14, 2010

  Sampling point

  MRT000 Max. Res. Time

  Sample type

  Routine

  Lab sample

  100615-022TH

  Laboratory

  MSDH Lab

  • Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2

    Result

    Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Not recorded

  • Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2

    Result

    Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Not recorded

  • Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2

    Result

    Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Not recorded

  • Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2

    Result

    Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level

    Monitoring period

    Not recorded

  • TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2

    Result

    0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.

    Monitoring period

    Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010

• Collected

  Feb 1, 2010

  Sampling point

  TF102 Treatment Plant T102

  Sample type

  Routine

  Lab sample

  100202-008CN

  Laboratory

  MSDH Lab

  Monitoring period

  Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010

  • Cyanide 1024 EPA method QC10204001X

    Result

    19.05 ug/l

Routine (10).