This is a rebuild of Drinking Water Watch and not yet the official record. Use the agency’s current Drinking Water Watch for anything you need to rely on.
Chemical and radiological sample results
MS0530025 , Wake Forest Water Assn
21 of the 57 analytes this system has been tested for have been detected at least once, across 330 samples on record.
The other 36 were tested for and never found. An analyte is counted here if any result on record measured it, so this covers the whole history and not the samples listed below.
Across all 330 samples on record, detections range from October 13, 2003 to July 13, 2026. These figures cover the whole record.
What counts as a non-detect is defined in the help: Less than Indicator. This system’s violations.
What has been detected, ever
Every analyte measured above its reporting level at any point in this system’s record, most often detected first. This is not limited to the samples listed below.
| Analyte | Kind | Detected in | First detected | Last detected |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper, Free 1022 | Inorganic Chemical | 239 of 239 results | Aug 12, 2004 | Sep 12, 2023 |
| Lead 1030 | Inorganic Chemical | 200 of 239 results | Aug 12, 2004 | Sep 12, 2023 |
| TTHM 2950 | Organic Chemical | 12 of 20 results | Aug 29, 2007 | Aug 13, 2025 |
| Barium 1010 | Inorganic Chemical | 11 of 11 results | Oct 13, 2003 | Jun 29, 2026 |
| Fluoride 1025 | Inorganic Chemical | 11 of 11 results | Oct 13, 2003 | Jun 29, 2026 |
| Arsenic 1005 | Inorganic Chemical | 10 of 11 results | Oct 13, 2003 | Jun 29, 2026 |
| Selenium 1045 | Inorganic Chemical | 10 of 11 results | Oct 13, 2003 | Jun 29, 2026 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Organic Chemical | 9 of 20 results | Aug 29, 2007 | May 4, 2026 |
| Chromium 1020 | Inorganic Chemical | 8 of 11 results | Oct 13, 2003 | Mar 17, 2025 |
| Bromoform 2942 | Organic Chemical | 7 of 15 results | Aug 21, 2013 | Aug 13, 2025 |
| Dibromochloromethane 2944 | Organic Chemical | 6 of 15 results | Sep 22, 2016 | Aug 13, 2025 |
| Nickel 1036 | Inorganic Chemical | 6 of 10 results | Mar 15, 2004 | Mar 17, 2025 |
| Gross Alpha, Incl. Radon & U 4002 | Radionuclide | 5 of 5 results | Dec 12, 2011 | Jul 19, 2012 |
| Combined Radium (-226 & -228) 4010 | Radionuclide | 5 of 5 results | Dec 12, 2011 | Jul 19, 2012 |
| Radium-226 4020 | Radionuclide | 5 of 5 results | Dec 12, 2011 | Jul 19, 2012 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 | Organic Chemical | 4 of 14 results | Sep 22, 2016 | Aug 13, 2025 |
| Sodium 1052 | Inorganic Chemical | 3 of 3 results | Sep 23, 2019 | Jul 13, 2026 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 | Organic Chemical | 2 of 14 results | Aug 12, 2024 | May 4, 2026 |
| Chloroform 2941 | Organic Chemical | 2 of 15 results | Aug 12, 2024 | May 14, 2025 |
| Bromodichloromethane 2943 | Organic Chemical | 2 of 15 results | Aug 12, 2024 | May 14, 2025 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 | Organic Chemical | 1 of 14 results | Aug 21, 2013 | Aug 21, 2013 |
No date range is applied: this list draws on every sample on record. Show the last two years only.
The most recent samples, result by result
The table below lists 231–240 of 330 samples, newest first — collected April 1, 2010 to October 19, 2010. The summary above covers all 330.
28 results from the 10 samples listed here: 15 detected, 13 not detected. Across the whole record it is 558 of 1,021. A sample is analysed for many analytes at once, so one sample appears on as many rows as it had results.
| Result | Analyte | Monitoring period |
|---|---|---|
|
||
| 0.0063 mg/l , sample collected Oct 19, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jul 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Oct 19, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jul 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| 0.0075 mg/l , sample collected Oct 19, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jul 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| 0.0008 mg/l , sample collected Oct 19, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jul 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| 0.0083 mg/l , sample collected Oct 19, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jul 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| 0.001 mg/l , sample collected Oct 19, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jul 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| Not detected below 0.25 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 30, 2010, sampling point TF080 | Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| Not detected below 0.2 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 30, 2010, sampling point TF080 | Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| Not detected below 0.05 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 30, 2010, sampling point TF080 | Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 14, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 14, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 14, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 14, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 14, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Jun 14, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 14, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 14, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 14, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 14, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Jun 14, 2010, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| 0.0447 mg/l , sample collected Apr 2, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2010 – Jun 30, 2010 |
| 0.0012 mg/l , sample collected Apr 2, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2010 – Jun 30, 2010 |
|
||
| 0.0161 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Apr 1, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2010 – Jun 30, 2010 |
| 0.001 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Apr 1, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2010 – Jun 30, 2010 |
|
||
| 0.0155 mg/l , sample collected Apr 1, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2010 – Jun 30, 2010 |
| 0.0009 mg/l , sample collected Apr 1, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2010 – Jun 30, 2010 |
|
||
| 0.0184 mg/l , sample collected Apr 1, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2010 – Jun 30, 2010 |
| 0.0011 mg/l , sample collected Apr 1, 2010, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2010 – Jun 30, 2010 |
-
- Collected
- Oct 19, 2010
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 101025-010PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jul 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0063 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Oct 19, 2010
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 101025-003PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jul 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0075 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0008 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Oct 19, 2010
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 101025-002PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jul 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0083 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.001 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Aug 30, 2010
- Sampling point
- TF080 Treatment Plant T080
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100831-053NI
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.25 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.2 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.05 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Jun 14, 2010
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100615-015HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
-
Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
- Collected
- Jun 14, 2010
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100615-015TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
-
Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
- Collected
- Apr 2, 2010
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100405-004PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2010 – Jun 30, 2010
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0447 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0012 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Apr 1, 2010
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100405-019PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2010 – Jun 30, 2010
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0161 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.001 mg/l The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
-
- Collected
- Apr 1, 2010
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100405-015PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2010 – Jun 30, 2010
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0155 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0009 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Apr 1, 2010
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100405-013PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2010 – Jun 30, 2010
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0184 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0011 mg/l
Routine (10).