This is a rebuild of Drinking Water Watch and not yet the official record. Use the agency’s current Drinking Water Watch for anything you need to rely on.
Chemical and radiological sample results
MS0530041 , Morrill Road Water Association
10 of the 13 analytes this system has been tested for have been detected at least once, across 77 samples on record.
The other 3 were tested for and never found. An analyte is counted here if any result on record measured it, so this covers the whole history and not the samples listed below.
Across all 77 samples on record, detections range from June 12, 2007 to September 25, 2023. These figures cover the whole record.
What counts as a non-detect is defined in the help: Less than Indicator. This system’s violations.
What has been detected, ever
Every analyte measured above its reporting level at any point in this system’s record, most often detected first. This is not limited to the samples listed below.
| Analyte | Kind | Detected in | First detected | Last detected |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper, Free 1022 | Inorganic Chemical | 30 of 30 results | Jul 12, 2007 | Sep 25, 2023 |
| Lead 1030 | Inorganic Chemical | 21 of 30 results | Jul 12, 2007 | Sep 13, 2023 |
| TTHM 2950 | Organic Chemical | 10 of 23 results | Jun 12, 2007 | Sep 8, 2014 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Organic Chemical | 9 of 24 results | Jun 12, 2007 | Jun 27, 2023 |
| Chloroform 2941 | Organic Chemical | 7 of 19 results | Sep 26, 2007 | Sep 8, 2014 |
| Bromodichloromethane 2943 | Organic Chemical | 6 of 19 results | Sep 26, 2007 | Sep 8, 2014 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 | Organic Chemical | 3 of 19 results | Aug 25, 2009 | Sep 8, 2014 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 | Organic Chemical | 2 of 19 results | Jul 9, 2014 | Sep 8, 2014 |
| Dibromochloromethane 2944 | Organic Chemical | 2 of 19 results | Aug 25, 2009 | Jun 11, 2014 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 | Organic Chemical | 1 of 19 results | Nov 29, 2017 | Nov 29, 2017 |
No date range is applied: this list draws on every sample on record. Show the last two years only.
The most recent samples, result by result
The table below lists 61–70 of 77 samples, newest first — collected July 12, 2007 to August 25, 2009. The summary above covers all 77.
48 results from the 10 samples listed here: 15 detected, 33 not detected. Across the whole record it is 91 of 278. A sample is analysed for many analytes at once, so one sample appears on as many rows as it had results.
Units in this table
TTHM is recorded on this page in ug/l and mg/l. 1 mg/l = 1,000 ug/l.
| Result | Analyte | Monitoring period |
|---|---|---|
|
||
| Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 25, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| 0.001 mg/l , sample collected Aug 25, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 25, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 25, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 25, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| 0 mg/l This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. , sample collected Aug 25, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009 |
|
||
| 1.88 ug/l , sample collected Aug 25, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Aug 25, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| 1.72 ug/l , sample collected Aug 25, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| 1.26 ug/l , sample collected Aug 25, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| 4.86 ug/l , sample collected Aug 25, 2009, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009 |
|
||
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 30, 2008, sampling point MRT000 | Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 30, 2008, sampling point MRT000 | Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 30, 2008, sampling point MRT000 | Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 30, 2008, sampling point MRT000 | Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Jun 30, 2008, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008 |
|
||
| Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 30, 2008, sampling point MRT000 | Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 30, 2008, sampling point MRT000 | Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 30, 2008, sampling point MRT000 | Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 30, 2008, sampling point MRT000 | Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 30, 2008, sampling point MRT000 | Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.006 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 30, 2008, sampling point MRT000 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008 |
|
||
| Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 26, 2007, sampling point MRT000 | Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 26, 2007, sampling point MRT000 | Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 26, 2007, sampling point MRT000 | Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 26, 2007, sampling point MRT000 | Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 26, 2007, sampling point MRT000 | Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.006 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 26, 2007, sampling point MRT000 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Jan 1, 2007 – Dec 31, 2007 |
|
||
| Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 26, 2007, sampling point MRT000 | Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 26, 2007, sampling point MRT000 | Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 26, 2007, sampling point MRT000 | Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 26, 2007, sampling point MRT000 | Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 26, 2007, sampling point MRT000 | Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.006 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 26, 2007, sampling point MRT000 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Jan 1, 2007 – Dec 31, 2007 |
|
||
| 1.21 ug/l , sample collected Sep 26, 2007, sampling point SM2 | Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 26, 2007, sampling point SM2 | Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| 1.05 ug/l , sample collected Sep 26, 2007, sampling point SM2 | Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 26, 2007, sampling point SM2 | Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| 2.26 ug/l , sample collected Sep 26, 2007, sampling point SM2 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
|
||
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 26, 2007, sampling point SM1 | Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 26, 2007, sampling point SM1 | Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 26, 2007, sampling point SM1 | Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 26, 2007, sampling point SM1 | Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Sep 26, 2007, sampling point SM1 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
|
||
| 0.0184 mg/l , sample collected Jul 12, 2007, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
| 0.0018 mg/l , sample collected Jul 12, 2007, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
|
||
| 0.0066 mg/l , sample collected Jul 12, 2007, sampling point DS000 | Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
| 0.0047 mg/l , sample collected Jul 12, 2007, sampling point DS000 | Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008 |
-
- Collected
- Aug 25, 2009
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 090826-007HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
-
Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- 0.001 mg/l
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- 0 mg/l This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here.
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009
-
- Collected
- Aug 25, 2009
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 090826-007TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
-
Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 1.88 ug/l
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 1.72 ug/l
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 1.26 ug/l
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 4.86 ug/l
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009
-
- Collected
- Jun 30, 2008
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 080701-014TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
-
Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008
-
- Collected
- Jun 30, 2008
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 080701-014HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
-
Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- Not detected below 0.006 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008
-
- Collected
- Sep 26, 2007
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 070927-014HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
-
Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- Not detected below 0.006 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2007 – Dec 31, 2007
-
- Collected
- Sep 26, 2007
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 070927-010HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
-
Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- Not detected below 0.006 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2007 – Dec 31, 2007
-
- Collected
- Sep 26, 2007
- Sampling point
- SM2 SM2
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 070927-003TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 1.21 ug/l
-
Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 1.05 ug/l
-
Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 2.26 ug/l
-
- Collected
- Sep 26, 2007
- Sampling point
- SM1 SM1
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 070927-006TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
-
- Collected
- Jul 12, 2007
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 070713-100PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0184 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0018 mg/l
-
- Collected
- Jul 12, 2007
- Sampling point
- DS000 Distribution
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 070713-098PB
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008
-
Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0066 mg/l
-
Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.0047 mg/l
Routine (10).