This is a rebuild of Drinking Water Watch and not yet the official record. Use the agency’s current Drinking Water Watch for anything you need to rely on.
Chemical and radiological sample results
MS0530044 , East Lee BLVD Water Assn.
11 of the 13 analytes this system has been tested for have been detected at least once, across 113 samples on record.
The other 2 were tested for and never found. An analyte is counted here if any result on record measured it, so this covers the whole history and not the samples listed below.
Across all 113 samples on record, detections range from June 12, 2007 to September 23, 2025. These figures cover the whole record.
What counts as a non-detect is defined in the help: Less than Indicator. This system’s violations.
What has been detected, ever
Every analyte measured above its reporting level at any point in this system’s record, most often detected first. This is not limited to the samples listed below.
| Analyte | Kind | Detected in | First detected | Last detected |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper, Free 1022 | Inorganic Chemical | 66 of 66 results | Jul 10, 2007 | Sep 23, 2025 |
| Lead 1030 | Inorganic Chemical | 36 of 66 results | Jul 10, 2007 | Sep 23, 2025 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Organic Chemical | 8 of 24 results | Jun 12, 2007 | Dec 19, 2022 |
| TTHM 2950 | Organic Chemical | 8 of 23 results | Jun 12, 2007 | Dec 19, 2022 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 | Organic Chemical | 3 of 17 results | Jun 29, 2011 | Jul 21, 2014 |
| Chloroform 2941 | Organic Chemical | 3 of 18 results | Sep 25, 2007 | Jul 21, 2014 |
| Bromodichloromethane 2943 | Organic Chemical | 3 of 18 results | Sep 25, 2007 | Jul 21, 2014 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 | Organic Chemical | 1 of 17 results | Nov 18, 2020 | Nov 18, 2020 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 | Organic Chemical | 1 of 17 results | Jul 10, 2018 | Jul 10, 2018 |
| Bromoform 2942 | Organic Chemical | 1 of 18 results | Sep 25, 2007 | Sep 25, 2007 |
| Dibromochloromethane 2944 | Organic Chemical | 1 of 18 results | Sep 25, 2007 | Sep 25, 2007 |
No date range is applied: this list draws on every sample on record. Show the last two years only.
The most recent samples, result by result
The table below lists 111–113 of 113 samples, newest first — collected July 21, 2004 to June 12, 2007. The summary above covers all 113.
7 results from the 3 samples listed here: 1 detected, 6 not detected. A sample is analysed for many analytes at once, so one sample appears on as many rows as it had results.
Units in this table
TTHM is recorded on this page in ug/l and mg/l. 1 mg/l = 1,000 ug/l.
| Result | Analyte | Monitoring period |
|---|---|---|
|
||
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 12, 2007, sampling point MRT000 | Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 12, 2007, sampling point MRT000 | Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 12, 2007, sampling point MRT000 | Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 12, 2007, sampling point MRT000 | Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Jun 12, 2007, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Jan 1, 2007 – Dec 31, 2007 |
|
||
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 21, 2004, sampling point MRT000 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
|
||
| Not detected below 0.01 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jul 21, 2004, sampling point MRT000 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
-
- Collected
- Jun 12, 2007
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 070613-016TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
-
Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2007 – Dec 31, 2007
-
- Collected
- Jul 21, 2004
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 040722-015TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Jul 21, 2004
- Sampling point
- MRT000 Max. Res. Time
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 040722-018HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.01 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
Routine (3).