Alpha
This is a rebuild of Drinking Water Watch and not yet the official record. Use the agency’s current Drinking Water Watch for anything you need to rely on.
Chemical and radiological sample results
MS0540018 , City of Sardis
23 of the 57 analytes this system has been tested for have been detected at least once, across 241 samples on record.
The other 34 were tested for and never found. An analyte is counted here if any result on record measured it, so this covers the whole history and not the samples listed below.
Across all 241 samples on record, detections range from October 13, 2003 to February 19, 2026. These figures cover the whole record.
What counts as a non-detect is defined in the help: Less than Indicator. This system’s violations.
What has been detected, ever
Every analyte measured above its reporting level at any point in this system’s record, most often detected first. This is not limited to the samples listed below.
| Analyte | Kind | Detected in | First detected | Last detected |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper, Free 1022 | Inorganic Chemical | 60 of 60 results | Aug 7, 2007 | Sep 27, 2023 |
| Lead 1030 | Inorganic Chemical | 36 of 60 results | Aug 7, 2007 | Sep 27, 2023 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Organic Chemical | 25 of 25 results | Jul 26, 2004 | Feb 19, 2026 |
| TTHM 2950 | Organic Chemical | 24 of 24 results | Jul 26, 2004 | Sep 2, 2025 |
| Barium 1010 | Inorganic Chemical | 24 of 24 results | Oct 13, 2003 | Mar 18, 2025 |
| Fluoride 1025 | Inorganic Chemical | 21 of 24 results | Oct 13, 2003 | Mar 18, 2025 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 | Organic Chemical | 19 of 21 results | Jun 30, 2008 | Feb 19, 2026 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 | Organic Chemical | 19 of 21 results | Jun 30, 2008 | Feb 19, 2026 |
| Chloroform 2941 | Organic Chemical | 19 of 21 results | Jun 11, 2007 | Sep 2, 2025 |
| Bromodichloromethane 2943 | Organic Chemical | 19 of 21 results | Jun 11, 2007 | Sep 2, 2025 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 | Organic Chemical | 18 of 21 results | Jun 30, 2008 | Feb 19, 2026 |
| Bromoform 2942 | Organic Chemical | 18 of 21 results | Jun 11, 2007 | Sep 2, 2025 |
| Dibromochloromethane 2944 | Organic Chemical | 18 of 21 results | Jun 11, 2007 | Sep 2, 2025 |
| Chromium 1020 | Inorganic Chemical | 14 of 24 results | Oct 13, 2003 | Oct 21, 2019 |
| Selenium 1045 | Inorganic Chemical | 6 of 24 results | Mar 15, 2004 | Mar 22, 2006 |
| Arsenic 1005 | Inorganic Chemical | 5 of 24 results | Mar 15, 2004 | Mar 22, 2006 |
| Nickel 1036 | Inorganic Chemical | 4 of 24 results | Jan 25, 2010 | Oct 21, 2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 | Organic Chemical | 3 of 21 results | Nov 9, 2009 | Jul 9, 2014 |
| Dichloromethane 2964 | Organic Chemical | 3 of 19 results | Aug 24, 2004 | Aug 24, 2004 |
| Asbestos 1094 | Inorganic Chemical | 1 of 1 result | Sep 23, 2019 | Sep 23, 2019 |
| Nitrite 1041 | Inorganic Chemical | 1 of 51 results | Mar 13, 2018 | Mar 13, 2018 |
| Cadmium 1015 | Inorganic Chemical | 1 of 24 results | Jan 25, 2010 | Jan 25, 2010 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 | Organic Chemical | 1 of 21 results | Aug 10, 2009 | Aug 10, 2009 |
No date range is applied: this list draws on every sample on record. Show the last two years only.
The most recent samples, result by result
The table below lists 141–150 of 241 samples, newest first — collected February 3, 2010 to December 15, 2010. The summary above covers all 241.
42 results from the 10 samples listed here: 7 detected, 35 not detected. Across the whole record it is 359 of 1,257. A sample is analysed for many analytes at once, so one sample appears on as many rows as it had results.
| Result | Analyte | Monitoring period |
|---|---|---|
|
||
| Not detected below 0.25 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Dec 15, 2010, sampling point TF104 | Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| Not detected below 0.2 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Dec 15, 2010, sampling point TF104 | Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| Not detected below 0.05 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Dec 15, 2010, sampling point TF104 | Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Oct 20, 2010, sampling point TF104 | Arsenic 1005 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| 0.010241 mg/l , sample collected Oct 20, 2010, sampling point TF104 | Barium 1010 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Oct 20, 2010, sampling point TF104 | Cadmium 1015 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| 0.000757 mg/l , sample collected Oct 20, 2010, sampling point TF104 | Chromium 1020 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| 0.118 mg/l , sample collected Oct 20, 2010, sampling point TF104 | Fluoride 1025 EPA method 380-75WE | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Oct 20, 2010, sampling point TF104 | Mercury 1035 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Oct 20, 2010, sampling point TF104 | Nickel 1036 EPA method 200.8 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.0025 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Oct 20, 2010, sampling point TF104 | Selenium 1045 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Oct 20, 2010, sampling point TF104 | Antimony, Total 1074 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Oct 20, 2010, sampling point TF104 | Beryllium, Total 1075 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Oct 20, 2010, sampling point TF104 | Thallium, Total 1085 EPA method 200.8 | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| Not detected below 15 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Oct 20, 2010, sampling point TF104 | Cyanide 1024 EPA method QC10204001X | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| Not detected below 0.25 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 1, 2010, sampling point TF103 | Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| Not detected below 0.2 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 1, 2010, sampling point TF103 | Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010 |
| Not detected below 0.05 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 1, 2010, sampling point TF103 | Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2 | Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 10, 2010, sampling point SM2 | Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 10, 2010, sampling point SM2 | Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 10, 2010, sampling point SM2 | Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 10, 2010, sampling point SM2 | Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Feb 10, 2010, sampling point SM2 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
|
||
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 10, 2010, sampling point SM1 | Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 10, 2010, sampling point SM1 | Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 10, 2010, sampling point SM1 | Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 10, 2010, sampling point SM1 | Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
| 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Feb 10, 2010, sampling point SM1 | TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 | Not recorded |
|
||
| Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 10, 2010, sampling point SM2 | Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 10, 2010, sampling point SM2 | Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 10, 2010, sampling point SM2 | Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 10, 2010, sampling point SM2 | Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 10, 2010, sampling point SM2 | Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Feb 10, 2010, sampling point SM2 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Not recorded |
|
||
| Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 10, 2010, sampling point SM1 | Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 10, 2010, sampling point SM1 | Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 10, 2010, sampling point SM1 | Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 10, 2010, sampling point SM1 | Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 10, 2010, sampling point SM1 | Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2 | Not recorded |
| 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Feb 10, 2010, sampling point SM1 | Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 | Not recorded |
|
||
| Not detected below 15 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 3, 2010, sampling point TF103 | Cyanide 1024 EPA method QC10204001X | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
|
||
| Not detected below 15 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Feb 3, 2010, sampling point TF101 | Cyanide 1024 EPA method QC10204001X | Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010 |
-
- Collected
- Dec 15, 2010
- Sampling point
- TF104 Treatment Plant T104
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 101216-001NI
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.25 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.2 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.05 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Oct 20, 2010
- Sampling point
- TF104 Treatment Plant T104
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 101021-011IN
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
-
Arsenic 1005 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Barium 1010 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.010241 mg/l
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Cadmium 1015 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Chromium 1020 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- 0.000757 mg/l
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Fluoride 1025 EPA method 380-75WE
- Result
- 0.118 mg/l
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Mercury 1035 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Nickel 1036 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Selenium 1045 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0025 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Antimony, Total 1074 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Beryllium, Total 1075 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Thallium, Total 1085 EPA method 200.8
- Result
- Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
- Collected
- Oct 20, 2010
- Sampling point
- TF104 Treatment Plant T104
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 101021-005CN
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Cyanide 1024 EPA method QC10204001X
- Result
- Not detected below 15 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Sep 1, 2010
- Sampling point
- TF103 Treatment Plant T103
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100902-059NI
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2010 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.25 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.2 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.05 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Feb 10, 2010
- Sampling point
- SM2 SM2
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100211-009TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
-
- Collected
- Feb 10, 2010
- Sampling point
- SM1 SM1
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100211-008TH
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2
- Result
- 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
-
- Collected
- Feb 10, 2010
- Sampling point
- SM2 SM2
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100211-009HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
-
- Collected
- Feb 10, 2010
- Sampling point
- SM1 SM1
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100211-008HA
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Not recorded
-
Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.002 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Dichloroacetic Acid 2451 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Trichloroacetic Acid 2452 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Monobromoacetic Acid 2453 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Dibromoacetic Acid 2454 EPA method 552.2
- Result
- Not detected below 0.001 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456
- Result
- 0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType.
-
- Collected
- Feb 3, 2010
- Sampling point
- TF103 Treatment Plant T103
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100204-015CN
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Cyanide 1024 EPA method QC10204001X
- Result
- Not detected below 15 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
-
- Collected
- Feb 3, 2010
- Sampling point
- TF101 Treatment Plant T101
- Sample type
- Routine
- Lab sample
- 100204-003CN
- Laboratory
- MSDH Lab
- Monitoring period
- Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2010
-
Cyanide 1024 EPA method QC10204001X
- Result
- Not detected below 15 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level
Routine (10).