Skip to main content
Alpha

This is a rebuild of Drinking Water Watch and not yet the official record. Use the agency’s current Drinking Water Watch for anything you need to rely on.

Chemical and radiological sample results

MS0540021 , Chickasaw Hills Subdivision

21 of the 64 analytes this system has been tested for have been detected at least once, across 99 samples on record.

The other 43 were tested for and never found. An analyte is counted here if any result on record measured it, so this covers the whole history and not the samples listed below.

Across all 99 samples on record, detections range from October 13, 2003 to March 25, 2025. These figures cover the whole record.

What counts as a non-detect is defined in the help: Less than Indicator. This system’s violations.

What has been detected, ever

Every analyte measured above its reporting level at any point in this system’s record, most often detected first. This is not limited to the samples listed below.

Every analyte ever detected for Chickasaw Hills Subdivision, with how many results found it and when it was first and last detected. Covers the whole record, not only the samples listed below.
Analyte Kind Detected in First detected Last detected
Copper, Free 1022 Inorganic Chemical 26 of 26 results Sep 17, 2008 Jul 30, 2020
Lead 1030 Inorganic Chemical 17 of 26 results Sep 17, 2008 Jul 13, 2017
Barium 1010 Inorganic Chemical 10 of 10 results Oct 13, 2003 Mar 25, 2025
Fluoride 1025 Inorganic Chemical 4 of 11 results Nov 1, 2004 Mar 25, 2025
Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 Organic Chemical 4 of 7 results Jun 24, 2010 Mar 4, 2025
Nickel 1036 Inorganic Chemical 3 of 10 results Oct 13, 2003 Oct 5, 2022
Sodium 1052 Inorganic Chemical 2 of 2 results Oct 23, 2019 Jun 3, 2021
Sulfate 1055 Inorganic Chemical 2 of 2 results Oct 13, 2003 Jun 3, 2021
TTHM 2950 Organic Chemical 2 of 7 results Sep 6, 2007 Jun 24, 2010
Calcium 1016 Inorganic Chemical 1 of 1 result Jun 3, 2021 Jun 3, 2021
Chloride 1017 Inorganic Chemical 1 of 1 result Jun 3, 2021 Jun 3, 2021
Conductivity @ 25 C Umhos/CM 1064 Water Quality 1 of 1 result Jun 3, 2021 Jun 3, 2021
Color 1905 Water Quality 1 of 1 result Jun 3, 2021 Jun 3, 2021
Alkalinity, Total 1927 Water Quality 1 of 1 result Jun 3, 2021 Jun 3, 2021
Combined Radium (-226 & -228) 4010 Radionuclide 1 of 3 results Jul 13, 2020 Jul 13, 2020
Radium-228 4030 Radionuclide 1 of 3 results Jul 13, 2020 Jul 13, 2020
Monochloroacetic Acid 2450 Organic Chemical 1 of 3 results Dec 7, 2016 Dec 7, 2016
Chromium 1020 Inorganic Chemical 1 of 10 results May 1, 2013 May 1, 2013
Gross Alpha Particle Activity 4109 Radionuclide 1 of 4 results Jun 29, 2012 Jun 29, 2012
Dichloromethane 2964 Organic Chemical 1 of 7 results Aug 23, 2004 Aug 23, 2004
Cadmium 1015 Inorganic Chemical 1 of 10 results Oct 13, 2003 Oct 13, 2003

No date range is applied: this list draws on every sample on record. Show the last two years only.

The most recent samples, result by result

The table below lists 71–80 of 99 samples, newest first — collected September 6, 2007 to October 15, 2009. The summary above covers all 99.

43 results from the 10 samples listed here: 10 detected, 33 not detected. Across the whole record it is 82 of 460. A sample is analysed for many analytes at once, so one sample appears on as many rows as it had results.

Chemical and radiological sample results for Chickasaw Hills Subdivision, every result from 71 to 80 of 99 samples shown, newest first. Not detected means the amount was below the level the laboratory can reliably report, which is given beside it.
Result Analyte Monitoring period
Collected
Oct 15, 2009
Sampling point
TF080 Treatment Plant T080
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
091016-004VO
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Oct 15, 2009, sampling point TF080 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 2378 EPA method 524.2 Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Oct 15, 2009, sampling point TF080 Cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene 2380 EPA method 524.2 Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Oct 15, 2009, sampling point TF080 Xylenes, Total 2955 EPA method 524.2 Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Oct 15, 2009, sampling point TF080 Dichloromethane 2964 EPA method 524.2 Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Oct 15, 2009, sampling point TF080 O-Dichlorobenzene 2968 EPA method 524.2 Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Oct 15, 2009, sampling point TF080 P-Dichlorobenzene 2969 EPA method 524.2 Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Oct 15, 2009, sampling point TF080 Vinyl Chloride 2976 EPA method 524.2 Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Oct 15, 2009, sampling point TF080 1,1-Dichloroethylene 2977 EPA method 524.2 Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Oct 15, 2009, sampling point TF080 Trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene 2979 EPA method 524.2 Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Oct 15, 2009, sampling point TF080 1,2-Dichloroethane 2980 EPA method 524.2 Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Oct 15, 2009, sampling point TF080 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 2981 EPA method 524.2 Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Oct 15, 2009, sampling point TF080 Carbon Tetrachloride 2982 EPA method 524.2 Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Oct 15, 2009, sampling point TF080 1,2-Dichloropropane 2983 EPA method 524.2 Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Oct 15, 2009, sampling point TF080 Trichloroethylene 2984 EPA method 524.2 Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Oct 15, 2009, sampling point TF080 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 2985 EPA method 524.2 Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Oct 15, 2009, sampling point TF080 Tetrachloroethylene 2987 EPA method 524.2 Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Oct 15, 2009, sampling point TF080 Chlorobenzene 2989 EPA method 524.2 Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Oct 15, 2009, sampling point TF080 Benzene 2990 EPA method 524.2 Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Oct 15, 2009, sampling point TF080 Toluene 2991 EPA method 524.2 Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Oct 15, 2009, sampling point TF080 Ethylbenzene 2992 EPA method 524.2 Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2010
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Method Detection Limit , sample collected Oct 15, 2009, sampling point TF080 Styrene 2996 EPA method 524.2 Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2010
Collected
Jun 1, 2009
Sampling point
TF080 Treatment Plant T080
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
090602-061NI
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
Not detected below 0.25 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 1, 2009, sampling point TF080 Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2 Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009
Not detected below 0.2 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 1, 2009, sampling point TF080 Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2 Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009
Not detected below 0.05 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Jun 1, 2009, sampling point TF080 Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2 Jan 1, 2009 – Dec 31, 2009
Collected
Oct 27, 2008
Sampling point
TF080 Treatment Plant T080
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
081028-030NI
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
Not detected below 0.25 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Oct 27, 2008, sampling point TF080 Nitrate-Nitrite 1038 EPA method 353.2 Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008
Not detected below 0.2 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Oct 27, 2008, sampling point TF080 Nitrate 1040 EPA method 353.2 Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008
Not detected below 0.05 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Oct 27, 2008, sampling point TF080 Nitrite 1041 EPA method 353.2 Jan 1, 2008 – Dec 31, 2008
Collected
Sep 17, 2008
Sampling point
DS000 Distribution
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
080918-055PB
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
0.0335 mg/l , sample collected Sep 17, 2008, sampling point DS000 Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008
0.0022 mg/l , sample collected Sep 17, 2008, sampling point DS000 Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008
Collected
Sep 17, 2008
Sampling point
DS000 Distribution
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
080918-049PB
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
0.1505 mg/l , sample collected Sep 17, 2008, sampling point DS000 Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008
0.0022 mg/l , sample collected Sep 17, 2008, sampling point DS000 Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008
Collected
Sep 17, 2008
Sampling point
DS000 Distribution
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
080918-048PB
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
0.1329 mg/l , sample collected Sep 17, 2008, sampling point DS000 Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008
0.0025 mg/l , sample collected Sep 17, 2008, sampling point DS000 Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008
Collected
Sep 17, 2008
Sampling point
DS000 Distribution
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
080918-047PB
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
0.0545 mg/l , sample collected Sep 17, 2008, sampling point DS000 Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008
0.0015 mg/l , sample collected Sep 17, 2008, sampling point DS000 Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008
Collected
Sep 17, 2008
Sampling point
DS000 Distribution
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
080918-046PB
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
0.0237 mg/l , sample collected Sep 17, 2008, sampling point DS000 Copper, Free 1022 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008
Not detected below 0.0005 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 17, 2008, sampling point DS000 Lead 1030 EPA method 200.8 Jan 1, 2006 – Dec 31, 2008
Collected
Sep 6, 2007
Sampling point
MRT000 Max. Res. Time
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
070907-007HA
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
Not detected below 0.006 mg/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 6, 2007, sampling point MRT000 Total Haloacetic Acids (Haa5) 2456 EPA method 552.2 Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007
Collected
Sep 6, 2007
Sampling point
MRT000 Max. Res. Time
Sample type
Routine
Lab sample
070907-006TH
Laboratory
MSDH Lab
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 6, 2007, sampling point MRT000 Chloroform 2941 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 6, 2007, sampling point MRT000 Bromoform 2942 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 6, 2007, sampling point MRT000 Bromodichloromethane 2943 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
Not detected below 1 ug/l Minimum Reporting Level , sample collected Sep 6, 2007, sampling point MRT000 Dibromochloromethane 2944 EPA method 524.2 Not recorded
0 This result is recorded as a detection, and the figure the agency wrote — "0.00" — is zero to the precision it was written to. Read the zero as "smaller than the written figure resolves", not as "none present". SDWIS holds a separate numeric concentration that Drinking Water Watch does not publish, so this endpoint does not carry it either; no more precise magnitude is available here. The agency recorded a value but no unit of measure for it. The unit is NOT inferable from the analyte: many analytes are reported in more than one unit — TTHM and HAA5 in both MG/L and UG/L — so there is no per-analyte default to fall back on. The number is published as it stands and must not be compared to a limit. The agency recorded which kind of limit this result was below, but stored 0.000000000 as the limit itself, which is not a level. The type is published and the value is null. What the limit was is not on record. Whether the result was a detection is a separate column: read resultType. , sample collected Sep 6, 2007, sampling point MRT000 TTHM 2950 EPA method 524.2 Jan 1, 2005 – Dec 31, 2007

Routine (10).